Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Elliott, Nathan; Choppin, Simon; Goodwill, Simon; Allen, Tom (2014)
Publisher: Elsevier
Journal: Procedia Engineering
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Engineering(all)
This research is concerned with tracking tennis racket movements. Previously, stereo camera systems have been used to track markers attached to rackets, which allows for racket movements to be obtained in three-dimensions. Typically, markers are manually selected on the image plane but this can be time consuming and inaccurate. This paper discusses a markerless method to measure three-dimensional racket movements using a camera. The method relies on a silhouette of a racket captured with a camera whose relative pose (rotation and translation) is unknown. A candidate relative pose is used to measure the\ud inconsistency between the silhouette and a set of racket silhouettes captured with a fully calibrated camera. The measure of inconsistency can be formulated as a cost function associated with the candidate relative pose. By adjusting parameters of the pose to minimise the cost, an accurate estimation for the true pose of the racket can be made. A validation scheme was developed to compare pose estimates with data obtained using camera calibration software. Rotation about the axis of x, y, z' were accurate to within 2.5° for 88, 90 and 86 % of estimates respectively and resultant translation to within 5 mm for 72% of estimates. This research is the first step in a process to fully validate a novel method for measuring tennis racket movements in real play conditions.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Abrams, G. D., Sheets, A. L., Andriacchi, T. P., Safran, M. R., 2011. Review of tennis serve motion analysis and the biomechanics of three serve types with implications for injury. Sports Biomechanics 10(4), 378-390.
    • Ahmadi, A., Rowlands, D. D., James, D. A., 2010. Development of inertial and novel marker-based techniques and analysis for upper arm rotational velocity measurements in tennis. Sports Engineering 12, 179-188.
    • Blievernicht, J.G., 1968. Accuracy in the Tennis Forehand Drive: Cinematographic Analysis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 39(3), 776-779.
    • Brody, H. 2000. Player sensitivity to the moments of inertia of a tennis racket. Sports Engineering 3, 145-148.
    • Choppin, S., 2008. Modelling of tennis racket impacts in 3D using elite players. PhD, University of Sheffield.
    • Elliott, B. C., Marsh, A. P., Blanksby, B., 1986. A Three-Dimensional Cinematographic Analysis of the Tennis Serve. International Journal of Sport Biomechanics 2(4), 260-271.
    • Elliott, B.C., Marsh, A.P., Overheu, P.R., 1989. The Topspin Backhand Drive in Tennis: A Biomechanical Analysis. Journal of Human Movement Studies 16, 1-16.
    • Forbes, K., Voigt, A., Bodika, N., 2003. Using silhouette consistency constraints to build 3D models. In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Symposium of the Pattern Recognition Association of South Africa (PRASA).
    • Knudson, D. V., Blackwell, J. R., 2005. Variability of impact kinematics and margin for error in the tennis forehand of advanced players. Sports Engineering 8, 75-80.
    • Laurentini, A., 1994. The visual hull concept for silhouette-based image understanding. IEEE Transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 16(2), 150-162.
    • Mitchell, S. R., Jones, R., King, M., 2000. Head speed vs. racket inertia in the tennis serve. Sports Engineering 3, 99-110.
    • Price, M., Morrison, G., 2007. Validating rigid body simulation of real particle shapes using pose estimation from high speed video. In: proceedings of the 4th international conference on discrete element methods, Brisbane, Australia.
    • Sheets, A. L., Abrams, G. D., Corazza, S., Safran, M. R., Andriacchi, T. P., 2011. Kinematics differences between the flat, kick, and slice serves measured using a markerless motion capture method. Annals of biomedical engineering 39(12), 3011-3020.
    • Strobl, K., Sepp, W., Fuchs, S., Paredes, C., Arbter, K., 2007. Camera Calibration Toolbox for Matlab, http://www.vision.caltech.edu/bouguetj/calib_doc/
    • Wong, K. -Y. K., 2001. Structure and motion from silhouettes. PhD, University of Cambridge.
    • Zhang, Z., 1999. Flexible camera calibration by viewing a plane from unknown orientations. In: proceedings of the 17th international Conference on Computer VisionCorfu, Greece, pp. 666-673.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article