LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
Subjects: L1, LB1603
This small-scale study into the summative assessment practices in ICT of schools in the North West of England identifies a lack of consistency in teacher assessment at the end of KS3. \ud \ud \ud Central to the research is a consideration of what is meant by ICT capability. This phrase is important in this research because it is the term used in Government policy documents to indicate what schools are to assess in ICT at the end of KS3. Hence, if ICT assessment is to be consistent, there should be a shared understanding of this term. The research explores the lack of common understanding of the term in literature and then goes on to illustrate how this lack of understanding is mirrored in schools. This results in inconsistency of practice in assessing ICT in schools. This inconsistency of practice is explored through in-depth interviews with a number of Heads of Department from a range of Secondary Schools in the North West of England. \ud \ud \ud Alongside the main consideration of assessment of ICT, the research also explores recent trends in assessment practices in English schools. The problematic nature of summative assessment is discussed as indicated by the attempts in the English National Curriculum to link assessment to observable and measurable criteria and how this leads to more and more trivialisation of what is being assessed. Assessment ‘backwash’ is considered where the outcomes of summative assessment are used in ways for which they were not originally intended; for example where summative assessment results such as those generated at the end of KS3 are used to measure the overall ‘quality’ of a school in comparison with other schools. Brief consideration is given to the recent focus on formative assessment techniques, as typified by the 2008 UK Government publication of an Assessment for Learning Strategy, although only in order to illustrate emerging assessment practices in schools. \ud \ud \ud A range of implications for schools and their assessment practices (particularly in relation to ICT) are identified.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • ACITT. (2002). Clare Johnson - Lightly Grilled. Teaching ICT, Vol. 1, No. 3, Autumn 2002. Available at: http://acitt.digitalbrain.com/acitt/web/resources/pubs/Journal%2003/index.htm last accessed 6th April 2010
    • ACITT. (2003). Skills vs. Capability. Teaching ICT, Vol. 2, No. 4, Summer 2003. Available at: http://acitt.digitalbrain.com/acitt/web/resources/pubs/Journal%2004/skills%20vs%20capability.pdf last accessed 6th April 2010
    • Cairns, L. (2000). The Process/outcome Approach to Becoming a Capable Organisation. Australian Capability Network Conference 2000 (pp. 1-14). Sydney.
    • Graham, L., Takis Metaxas, P. (2003). Of Course It's True: I Saw It On the Internet. Critical Thinking in the Internet Era. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 46, No. 5, pp. 71-75
    • Hadjerrouit, S. (2009). Didactics of ICT in Secondary Education: Conceptual Issues and Practical Perspectives. Issues Informing Science and Information Technology, Vol. 6. Pp. 153-178
    • Hammersley, M. (1993). Social Research: Philosophy, Politics and Practice. London. Sage.
    • Hammersley, M. (1992). Ethnography: What it is and What it Offers. In: Hegarty, S. Nation, P. (1992). Research and Evaluation Methods in Special Education. Philadelphia. NFER-Nelson.
    • Hammersley, M., Atkinson, P. (1983). Ethnography: Principles in Practice. London. Routledge.
    • Hammond, M. (2004). The Peculiarities of Teaching Information and Communication Technology as a Subject: A Study of Trainee and New Teachers in Secondary Schools. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 29-42
    • Watson, D. (2001). Pedagogy before Teaching: Re-thinking the Relationship between ICT and Teaching. Education and Information Technologies, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 251-266
    • Webb, M.E. (2002). Pedagogical Reasoning: Issues and Solutions for the Teaching and Learning of ICT in Secondary Schools. Education and Information Technologies, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 237-255
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article