LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Languages: English
Types: Other
Subjects: HRDS, LAW
Adjudication on territorial asylum claims is considered to be one of the most difficult forms of legal decision-making, a fact which is further complicated by the lack of substantive guidance in international instruments as to minimum standards regarding the nature of the adjudicator. In this context, some States in Latin America have adopted procedures that are either carried out by their Ministries of Foreign Affairs or by inter-institutional committees where they hold prominent positions, which leads to the situation where the body charged with maintaining relations with foreign nations also has to determine whether they persecute their citizens, violate their fundamental rights or are unwilling or unable to protect them from the actions of third parties. The purpose of this article is to analyse the origins and implications of this situation and respond to the lack of research in this field, through both legal analysis and preliminary original research conducted in collaboration with NGOs working with asylum-seekers in the region. The author argues that this practice, which has recently received attention due to the Snowden case, leads to unfairness in adjudication and to the use of asylum as a foreign policy tool, consequently breaching both universal and regional legal obligations.
  • No references.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article