LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Tar, Usman A. (2007)
Publisher: Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, London Metropolitan University
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: dewey320
This article offers methodological reflections of the relationships between\ud liberal democratisation and ethnic politics in Africa, based on a critique of an\ud ‘empirical’ research work carried out on the subject matter by Smith (2000: 21-\ud 39). In this work, Smith uses a sophisticated variety of quantitative techniques\ud to engage the debate on the causal association between three key variables:\ud political liberalisation, democratisation and ethnic conflict in Africa. A seeming\ud innovation of Smith is the use of a less familiar method (regression analysis)\ud amongst scholars of African politics to advance a positivistic argument for an\ud intellectual subject matter that has so far been subjected to constructivist\ud explanations. This article argues that (a) Smith’s quantitative work can and do\ud complement existing qualitative work, particularly amongst African and\ud Africanist scholars. Yet, it argues that (b) Smith’s technique and arguments are\ud so riven with sophisticated statistical formulae and abstract analysis that they\ud do not lend themselves to easy comprehension. The article therefore (c)\ud questions the exclusive utility of a positivist approach in studying African\ud politics – a terrain awash with subjective realities and (d) recommends the\ud importance of mixing methods, as a means of ensuring methodological\ud synergy.
  • No references.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article