Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Lott, Yvonne; Chung, Heejung (2016)
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: H1
Schedule control can have both positive – e.g., increased income – but also negative outcomes – e.g., increased overtime. Here our core interest is whether there are gender discrepancies in these outcomes. Given the different ways in which schedule control can be used, and perceived to be used by men and women, their outcomes are also expected to be different. This is examined using the German Socio-Economic Panel Study (2003-2011), and panel regression models. The results show that schedule control is associated with increases in overtime and income – but only for men. Women in full-time positions also increase their overtime hours when using schedule control yet they do not receive similar financial rewards. The results of this study provide evidence to show that increases in schedule control has the potential to traditionalise gender roles by increasing mainly men’s working hours, while also adding to the gender pay gap.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations, Gender and Society, 4(2), 139 158.
    • Kelly, E. L. and Kalev, A. (2006). Managing Flexible Work Arrangements in Us Organizations: Formalized Socio-Economic Review, 4, 379 416.
    • OECD (2013a). OECD Labour http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/oecd_ifs-2013-en Van Echtelt, P., Glebbeek, A., Lewis, S. and Lindenberg, S. (2009). Post-Fordist Work: A Man's World?, Gender and Society, 23(2), 188 214.
    • Weeden, K. A. (2005) 'Is There a Flexiglass Ceiling? Flexible Work Arrangements and Wages in the United States', Social Science Research, 34, 454-482.
    • White, M., Hill, S., McGovern, P., Mils, C. and Smeaton, D. (2003). 'High-performance' Management Practices, Working Hours and Work-Life Balance, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 41, 175 195.
    • Williams, J. C., Blair-Loy, M. and Berdahl, J. L. (2013). Cultural Schemas, Social Class, and the Flexibility Stigma, Journal of Social Issues, 69(2), 209 234.
    • Woolridge, J. M. (2002). Introductory Econometrics. A modern approach. Mason, Ohio: Thomson South-Western.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article