Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:

OpenAIRE is about to release its new face with lots of new content and services.
During September, you may notice downtime in services, while some functionalities (e.g. user registration, login, validation, claiming) will be temporarily disabled.
We apologize for the inconvenience, please stay tuned!
For further information please contact helpdesk[at]openaire.eu

fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Cormack, Anne (2007)
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
Subjects: HM, GV
In A Theory of Justice (1971) John Rawls attempted to solve the problem of distributive justice by combining self-interest, ignorance and risk-aversion. He argued that if self-interested persons in a situation of uncertainty imposed by a veil of ignorance were choosing principles for the basic structure of society, then they would be risk-adverse and choose two principles – The Principle of Equal Liberty and the Difference Principle. Critics have argued against this risk-adverse element of Rawls’ theory but those critics as well as Rawls made certain presuppositions about risk-aversion, risk-taking and gambling. This thesis also examines the risk-aversion in Rawls’ theory but addresses the previous shortfall by exploring the issue of risk and gambling in two interrelated ways. It applies a Foucauldian approach to the history of risk and gambling in order to contextualise the current views and then investigates the contemporary meaning by drawing on research leading up to the UK Gambling Act 2005. Drawing on these findings it argues that not only might risk-taking occur in the original position but that different types of participants could show different degrees of risk-taking behaviour. By exploring the theoretical debates between essentialism and anti-essentialism, it further argues that it is unlikely that the veil of ignorance would be able to screen out those differences. It then employs theories of identity and difference in the work of Heidegger, Deleuze and Lyotard in an attempt to overcome that weakness in Rawls’ theory but finds that this may not be possible. After highlighting a connection between impartiality and gambling, it concludes, in contrast to Rawls, that risk-taking rather than risk-aversion lies at the heart of social justice. The implication of this reversal is that it may have an impact on policy-decisions in other areas of the justice system.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 3. Notes of a meeting (12 September 2003) between Chris Bone, Graham Catt, Derek Aldridge, Andy Swyer, Chris Stendall and Richard Beston.
    • 4. Letter from Richard Beston to Andrew Mclntosh (19 January 2004) with copies to Alex Towers, Gareth Maybury, Andrew Ramsay, Elliot Grant, Chris Bone, Greg Chalmers, Graham Catt and Nick Bent.
    • 5. Email from Chris Bone to Elliot Grant, Dave Bawden, Graham Catt and Greg Chalmers (6 August 2003).
    • 6. Letter from Richard Beston (20 November 2003) to Andrew Mclntosh with copies to Alex Towers, Andrew Ramsay, Elliot Grant, Chris Bone, Derek Aldridge of the gaming board, Greg Chalmers, Graham Catt and Nick Bent.
    • 7. Letter from Tobin Prior (Kerzner International) to Andrew (Minister for the Media and Heritage).
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
More information Ok