LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: MDPI
Journal: Animals
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: cattle farmer/s, SF600-1100, biosecurity, Zoology, Article, QL1-991, Veterinary medicine, disease prevention, disease control, theory of planned behaviour, health psychology models, dairy, belief, attitude
Simple Summary Further understanding of why dairy farmers do not engage in disease prevention and control strategies (biosecurity) is required. Using semi-structured interviews informed by a health psychology approach with 25 dairy farmers, a number of barriers, such as disease testing inaccuracies, types of disease transmission, perceived lack of risk and effectiveness of measures, were identified. Motivators included being advised to undertake measures by veterinarians, and the increased threat and severity of the disease in focus. These results suggest there is an advantage to farm advisors and herd health professionals understanding and working with the beliefs of individual dairy farmers to target appropriate communication and advice strategies relating to biosecurity recommendations. Abstract Disease prevention and control practices are frequently highlighted as important to ensure the health and welfare of farmed animals, although little is known as to why not many practices are carried out. The aim of this study was to identify the motivators and barriers of dairy cattle farmers towards the use of biosecurity measures on dairy farms using a health psychology approach. Twenty-five farmers on 24 farms in Great Britain (GB) were interviewed using the Theory of Planned Behaviour framework. Results indicated that farmers perceived they had the ability to control what happened on their farms in terms of preventing and controlling disease, and described benefits from being proactive and vigilant. However, barriers were cited in relation to testing inaccuracies, effectiveness and time-efficiency of practices, and disease transmission route (e.g., airborne transmission). Farmers reported they were positively influenced by veterinarians and negatively influenced by the government (Department for Environment Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA)) and the general public. Decisions to implement practices were influenced by the perceived severity of the disease in question, if disease was diagnosed on the farm already, or was occurring on other farms. Farmers described undertaking a form of personal risk assessment when deciding if practices were worth doing, which did not always involve building in disease specific factors or opinions from veterinarians or other advisors. These results indicate that further guidance about the intricacies of control and prevention principles in relation to specific animal diseases may be required, with an obvious role for veterinarians. There appears to be an opportunity for farm advisors and herd health professionals to further understand farmer beliefs behind certain attitudes and target communication and advice accordingly to further enhance dairy cattle health and welfare.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Anderson, J. Biosecurity: A new term for an old concept: How to apply it. Bov. Pract. 1998, 32, 61-70. Gunn, G.; Stott, A.; Humphry, R. Modelling and costing BVD outbreaks in beef herds. Vet. J. 2004, 167, 143-149. [CrossRef]
    • Hennessy, D.A. Economic aspects of agricultural and food biosecurity. Biosecur. Bioterror. Biodef. Strategy Pract. Sci. 2008, 6, 66-77. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    • 4. Frössling, J.; Nöremark, M. Differing perceptions-Swedish farmers' views of infectious disease control. Vet. Med. Sci. 2016, 2, 54-68. [CrossRef]
    • 5. Cresswell, E.; Brennan, M.; Barkema, H.; Wapenaar, W. A questionnaire-based survey on the uptake and use of cattle vaccines in the UK. Vet. Rec. Open 2014, 1, e000042. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    • 6. Sayers, R.G.; Sayers, G.P.; Mee, J.F.; Good, M.; Bermingham, M.L.; Grant, J.; Dillon, P.G. Implementing biosecurity measures on dairy farms in Ireland. Vet. J. 2013, 197, 259-267. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    • 7. Sarrazin, S.; Cay, A.B.; Laureyns, J.; Dewulf, J. A survey on biosecurity and management practices in selected Belgian cattle farms. Prev. Vet. Med. 2014, 117, 129-139. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    • 8. Nöremark, M.; Frössling, J.; Lewerin, S.S. Application of routines that contribute to on-farm biosecurity as reported by Swedish livestock farmers. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2010, 57, 225-236. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    • 9. Sahlström, L.; Virtanen, T.; Kyyrö, J.; Lyytikäinen, T. Biosecurity on Finnish cattle, pig and sheep farms-Results from a questionnaire. Prev. Vet. Med. 2014, 117, 59-67. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    • 10. Sayers, R.; Good, M.; Sayers, G. A survey of biosecurity-related practices, opinions and communications across dairy farm veterinarians and advisors. Vet. J. 2014, 200, 261-269. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    • 11. Pritchard, K.; Wapenaar, W.; Brennan, M.L. Cattle veterinarians' awareness and understanding of biosecurity. Vet. Rec. 2015, 176. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    • 12. Bottoms, K.; Dewey, C.; Richardson, K.; Poljak, Z. Investigation of biosecurity risks associated with the feed delivery: A pilot study. Can. Vet. J. 2015, 56, 502-508. [PubMed]
    • 13. Heffernan, C.; Nielsen, L.; Thomson, K.; Gunn, G. An exploration of the drivers to bio-security collective action among a sample of UK cattle and sheep farmers. Prev. Vet. Med. 2008, 87, 358-372. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    • 14. Brennan, M.L.; Christley, R.M. Cattle producers' perceptions of biosecurity. BMC Vet. Res. 2013, 9, 71. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    • 15. Garforth, C.J.; Bailey, A.P.; Tranter, R.B. Farmers' attitudes to disease risk management in England: A comparative analysis of sheep and pig farmers. Prev. Vet. Med. 2013, 110, 456-466. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    • 16. Toma, L.; Stott, A.W.; Heffernan, C.; Ringrose, S.; Gunn, G.J. Determinants of biosecurity behaviour of British cattle and sheep farmers-A behavioural economics analysis. Prev. Vet. Med. 2013, 108, 321-333. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    • 17. Michie, S.; Abraham, C. Interventions to change health behaviours: Evidence-based or evidence-inspired? Psychol. Health 2004, 19, 29-49. [CrossRef]
    • 18. Ajzen, I.; Fishbein, M. Attitude-behaviour relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychol. Bull. 1977, 84, 888-918. [CrossRef]
    • 19. Willock, J.; Deary, I.J.; McGregor, M.M.; Sutherland, A.; Edwards-Jones, G.; Morgan, O.; Dent, B.; Grieve, R.; Gibson, G.; Austin, E. Farmers' attitudes, objectives, behaviours, and personality traits: The Edinburgh study of decision making on farms. J. Vocat. Behav. 1999, 54, 5-36. [CrossRef]
    • 20. Glanz, K.; Rimer, B.K. Theory at A Glance: A Guide for Health Promotion Practice, 2nd ed.; NIH: Washington, DC, USA, 2005.
    • 21. Burton, R.J. Reconceptualising the “behavioural approach” in agricultural studies: A socio-psychological perspective. J. Rural Stud. 2004, 20, 359-371. [CrossRef]
    • 22. Noar, S.M.; Zimmerman, R.S. Health behaviour theory and cumulative knowledge regarding health behaviours: Are we moving in the right direction? Health Educ. Res. 2005, 20, 275-290. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    • 23. Garforth, C.; Rehman, T.; McKemey, K.; Tranter, R.; Cooke, R.; Yates, C.; Park, J.; Dorward, P. Improving the design of knowledge transfer strategies by understanding farmer attitudes and behaviour. J. Farm Manag. 2004, 12, 17-32.
    • 24. Ellis-Iversen, J.; Cook, A.J.; Watson, E.; Nielen, M.; Larkin, L.; Wooldridge, M.; Hogeveen, H. Perceptions, circumstances and motivators that influence implementation of zoonotic control programs on cattle farms. Prev. Vet. Med. 2010, 93, 276-285. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    • 25. Valeeva, N.; van Asseldonk, M.; Backus, G. Perceived risk and strategy efficacy as motivators of risk management strategy adoption to prevent animal diseases in pig farming. Prev. Vet. Med. 2011, 102, 284-295. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    • 26. Lind, A.-K.; Thomsen, P.T.; Rintakoski, S.; Espetvedt, M.N.; Wolff, C.; Houe, H. The association between farmers' participation in herd health programmes and their behaviour concerning treatment of mild clinical mastitis. Acta Vet. Scand. 2012, 54, 62. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    • 27. Delgado, A.H.; Norby, B.; Dean, W.R.; McIntosh, W.A.; Scott, H.M. Utilizing qualitative methods in survey design: Examining Texas cattle producers' intent to participate in foot-and-mouth disease detection and control. Prev. Vet. Med. 2012, 103, 120-135. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    • 28. Bruijnis, M.; Hogeveen, H.; Garforth, C.; Stassen, E. Dairy farmers' attitudes and intentions towards improving dairy cow foot health. Livest. Sci. 2013, 155, 103-113. [CrossRef]
    • 29. Espetvedt, M.; Lind, A.-K.; Wolff, C.; Rintakoski, S.; Virtala, A.-M.; Lindberg, A. Nordic dairy farmers' threshold for contacting a veterinarian and consequences for disease recording: Mild clinical mastitis as an example. Prev. Vet. Med. 2013, 108, 114-124. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    • 30. Jääskeläinen, T.; Kauppinen, T.; Vesala, K.; Valros, A. Relationships between pig welfare, productivity and farmer disposition. Anim. Welf. 2014, 23, 435-443. [CrossRef]
    • 31. Alarcon, P.; Wieland, B.; Mateus, A.L.; Dewberry, C. Pig farmers' perceptions, attitudes, influences and management of information in the decision-making process for disease control. Prev. Vet. Med. 2014, 116, 223-242. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    • 32. Delgado, A.H.; Norby, B.; Scott, H.M.; Dean, W.; McIntosh, W.A.; Bush, E. Distribution of cow-calf producers' beliefs about reporting cattle with clinical signs of foot-and-mouth disease to a veterinarian before or during a hypothetical outbreak. Prev. Vet. Med. 2014, 117, 505-517. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    • 33. Shortall, O.; Ruston, A.; Green, M.; Brennan, M.; Wapenaar, W.; Kaler, J. Broken biosecurity? Veterinarians' framing of biosecurity on dairy farms in England. Prev. Vet. Med. 2016, 132, 20-31. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    • 34. Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behaviour. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1991, 50, 179-211. [CrossRef]
    • 35. Godin, G.; Kok, G. The theory of planned behaviour: A review of its applications to health-related behaviours. Am. J. Health Promot. 1996, 11, 87-98. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    • 36. Potente, S.; Coppa, K.; Williams, A.; Engels, R. Legally brown: Using ethnographic methods to understand sun protection attitudes and behaviours among young Australians “I didn't mean to get burnt-It just happened!”. Health Educ. Res. 2011, 26, 39-52. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    • 37. White, K.M.; Jimmieson, N.L.; Obst, P.L.; Graves, N.; Barnett, A.; Cockshaw, W.; Gee, P.; Haneman, L.; Page, K.; Campbell, M.; et al. Using a theory of planned behaviour framework to explore hand hygiene beliefs at the “5 critical moments” among Australian hospital-based nurses. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2015, 15. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    • 38. Jansen, J.; Van Schaik, G.; Renes, R.; Lam, T. The effect of a national mastitis control program on the attitudes, knowledge, and behaviour of farmers in The Netherlands. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93, 5737-5747. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    • 39. Bryman, A. Sampling in qualitative research. In Social Research Methods, 4th ed.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 415-429.
    • 40. DEFRA. Field Services Offices (Animal Health & Welfare). Available online: https://www.gov.uk/ government/organisations/animal-and-plant-health-agency/about/access-and-opening#field-servicesoffices-animal-health--welfare (accessed on 23 September 2016).
    • 41. Attride-Stirling, J. Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qual. Res. 2001, 1, 385-405. [CrossRef]
    • 42. Braun, V.; Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 2006, 3, 77-101. [CrossRef]
    • 43. Gosling, L.; Stavisky, J.; Dean, R. What is a feral cat? Variation in definitions may be associated with different management strategies. J. Feline Med. Surg. 2013, 15, 759-764. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    • 44. Scottish Government. The Scottish Bvd Eradication Scheme. Available online: http://www.gov. scot/Topics/farmingrural/Agriculture/animal-welfare/Diseases/disease/bvd/eradication (accessed on 23 September 2016).
    • 45. TB Hub. Available online: http://www.tbhub.co.uk/ (accessed on 23 September 2016).
    • 46. Brownlie, J.; Thompson, I.; Curwen, A. Bovine virus diarrhoea virus-strategic decisions for diagnosis and control. Practice 2000, 22, 176-187. [CrossRef]
    • 47. Slovic, P. Perception of risk. Science 1987, 236, 280-285. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    • 48. Hobson-West, P. “Trusting blindly can be the biggest risk of all”: Organised resistance to childhood vaccination in the UK. Sociol. Health Illn. 2007, 29, 198-215. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    • 49. Palmer, S.; Fozdar, F.; Sully, M. The effect of trust on West Australian farmers' responses to infectious livestock diseases. Sociol. Rural. 2009, 49, 360-374. [CrossRef]
    • 50. Gunn, G.; Heffernan, C.; Hall, M.; McLeod, A.; Hovi, M. Measuring and comparing constraints to improved biosecurity amongst GB farmers, veterinarians and the auxiliary industries. Prev. Vet. Med. 2008, 84, 310-323. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    • 51. Enticott, G.; Franklin, A.; Van Winden, S. Biosecurity and food security: Spatial strategies for combating bovine tuberculosis in the UK. Geogr. J. 2012, 178, 327-337. [CrossRef]
    • 52. Hernández-Jover, M.; Gilmour, J.; Schembri, N.; Sysak, T.; Holyoake, P.; Beilin, R.; Toribio, J.A. Use of stakeholder analysis to inform risk communication and extension strategies for improved biosecurity amongst small-scale pig producers. Prev. Vet. Med. 2012, 104, 258-270. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    • 53. Richens, I.F.; Hobson-West, P.; Brennan, M.L.; Lowton, R.; Kaler, J.; Wapenaar, W. Farmers' perceptions of the role of veterinary surgeons in vaccination strategies on British dairy farms. Vet. Rec. 2015, 177. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    • 54. Ruston, A.; Shortall, O.; Green, M.; Brennan, M.; Wapenaar, W.; Kaler, J. Challenges facing the farm animal veterinary profession in England: A qualitative study of veterinarians' perceptions and responses. Prev. Vet. Med. 2016, 127, 84-93. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    • 55. Slater, M.D.; Rouner, D. Value-affirmative and value-protective processing of alcohol education messages that include statistical evidence or anecdotes. Commun. Res. 1996, 23, 210-235. [CrossRef]
    • 56. Lam, T.; Jansen, J.; Van den Borne, B.; Renes, R.; Hogeveen, H. What veterinarians need to know about communication to optimise their role as advisors on udder health in dairy herds. N. Z. Vet. J. 2011, 59, 8-15. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    • 57. Nerlich, B.; Wright, N. Biosecurity and insecurity: The interaction between policy and ritual during the foot and mouth crisis. Environ. Values 2006, 15, 441-462. [CrossRef]
    • 58. Savadori, L.; Savio, S.; Nicotra, E.; Rumiati, R.; Finucane, M.; Slovic, P. Expert and public perception of risk from biotechnology. Risk Anal. 2004, 24, 1289-1299. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    • 59. Sniehotta, F.F.; Presseau, J.; Araújo-Soares, V. Time to retire the theory of planned behaviour. Health Psychol. Rev. 2014, 8, 1-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    • 60. Roth, J.A. Ritual and magic in the control of contagion. Am. Sociol. Rev. 1957, 22, 310-314. [CrossRef]
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article