Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:

OpenAIRE is about to release its new face with lots of new content and services.
During September, you may notice downtime in services, while some functionalities (e.g. user registration, login, validation, claiming) will be temporarily disabled.
We apologize for the inconvenience, please stay tuned!
For further information please contact helpdesk[at]openaire.eu

fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Edmondson, Amanda J.
Publisher: PCCS Books.
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
Subjects: RT, R1
Background: Why do people harm themselves intentionally and sometimes painfully and repeatedly even when they do not wish to die? This thesis explores that question using traditional and non-traditional research approaches.\ud \ud Methods: Firstly, a systematic review was undertaken to identify and undertake a qualitative synthesis of the existing empirical evidence on functions of self-harm, and explore whether particular research approaches concentrate on and identify particular functions of self-harm. Based on those findings, a second study employed a qualitative approach using photo elicitation, a method in which photographs were used as a stimulus and guide within the interview. An adapted polytextual thematic analysis was employed to identify themes within eight participants’ narratives, which consisted of text and images. Finally, a third study also employed a qualitative visual methods approach to explore the content of images posted on blogs tagged as self-harm from two blog management sites, over a five month period. A polytextual analysis of 230 images was conducted.\ud \ud Results: In addition to empirical evidence to support existing functional models of self-harm, the systematic review also found evidence of other functions which have received less attention in the theoretical literature. Findings suggested particular research approaches might be restricting our knowledge of some of the different and nuanced functions self-harm, and might account for the apparent gap between the empirical evidence and extant theoretical models of self-harm. A visual methods approach in the second study also confirmed evidence of some functions which have received less attention in the literature. For example, how people used self-harm positively, as a way of protection and as a language. Similarly, the visual content from the third study portrayed a trajectory of self-harm which was largely experienced by females who used it as a means of escape, self-expression, and as a language to communicate with noncorporeal others. Strengths and limitations of using a visual methods approach are also presented.\ud \ud Conclusions: Employing a novel research approach based on visual methods to access the complex and sometimes ineffable experiences of self-harm proved useful in broadening our understanding of some of the reasons why people self-harm.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • BROWN, M., COMTOIS, K. & LINEHAN, M. 2002. Reasons for Suicide Attempts and Non Suicidal Self-Injury in Women with Borderline Personality Disorder Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 198-202.
    • BROWN, S. A. 2009. Personality and non-suicidal deliberate self-harm: Trait differences among a non-clinical population. Psychiatry Research, 169, 28-32.
    • BRYANT, L. & BECKITT, J. 2006. The Practicality and Acceptability of an Advocacy Service in the Emergency Department for People Attending Following SelfHarm. University of Leeds.
    • CADWALLADR, C. 2009. How Bridgend was damned by distortion. The Observer.
    • CARR, E. 1977. The Motivation to Self Injurious Behaviour: A review of some hypotheses. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 800-816.
    • CLAES, L., KLONSKY, D., MEUHLENKAMP, J., KUPPENS, P. & VANDEREYCKEN, W. 2010. The affect regulation function of NSSI in eating disordered patients : which affect states are regulated? . Comprehensive Psychiatry, 51, 386-392.
    • CLAES, L. & VANDEREYCKEN, W. 2007a. Self-injurious behaviour:differential diagnosis and functional differentiation. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 48, 137- 144.
    • CLAES, L. & VANDEREYCKEN, W. 2007b. The Self-Injury Questionnaire-Treatment Related (SIQ-TR): Construction, reliability and validity in a sample of female eating disorder patients. In: GOLDFARB, P. M. (ed.) Psychological Tests and Testing Research Trends. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
    • CLARK, A. 2006. Anonymising research data. In: METHODS, N. C. F. R. (ed.) Real life methods working paper.
    • CLARK, A., PROSSER, J. & WILES, R. 2010. Ethical issues in image based research. Arts and Health, 2, 81-93.
    • CLARKE, L. & WHITTAKER, M. 1998. Self mutilation: culture, contexts and nursing responses. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 7, 129-137.
    • COLLIER, M. 2002. Approaches to analysis in visual anthropology. In: VAN LEEUWEN, T., JEWITT, C (ed.) Handbook of visual analysis. London: Sage.
    • COLLINS, D. 1996. Attacks on the body: how can we understand self-harm. Psychodynamic practice, 2, 463-475.
    • COOPER, C. & YARBROUGH, S. 2010. Tell me, show me: Using combined Focus Group and Photovoice Methods to Gain Understanding of Health Issues in Guatemala Qualitative Health Research, 20, 644-653.
    • CORBIN, J. & MORSE, J. 2003. The Unstructured Interactive Interview: Issues of Reciprocity and Risks when Dealing with Sensitive Topics. Qualitative Inquiry, 9, 335-354.
    • COSTOSA, J. M. 2007. Motivations and psychological correlates of self injurious behaviour in non clinical populations. Temple University
    • CRESWELL, J. & PLANO CLARK, V. 2011. Designing and conducting mixed methods research, US, Sage.
    • CROMBY, J. 2011. Feeling the way: Qualitative clinical Research and the Affective Turn. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 9, 88-98.
    • DANET, B. 2002. Studies of cyberplay: ethical and methodological aspects. Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Visiting fellow of Yale University.
    • DAVIES, K. 2008. Informed consent in visual research. Real life methods. University of Manchester: ESRC National Centre for Research Methods.
    • DE LUCA, M. 2010. Incest and self-cutting: Sibling-incest and partial register. Evolution Psychiatrique, 75, 165-181.
    • DEAR, G., THOMSON, D. & HILLS, A. 2000. Self harm in prison, manipulators can also be suicide attempters. Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 27, 160-175.
    • DEMMING, V. 2008. Women's reflection on their adolescent self injury in relation to grief and los. PhD in Psychology, Faculty of Saybrook Graduate School and Research Center. PhD in Psychology.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
More information Ok