Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:

OpenAIRE is about to release its new face with lots of new content and services.
During September, you may notice downtime in services, while some functionalities (e.g. user registration, login, validation, claiming) will be temporarily disabled.
We apologize for the inconvenience, please stay tuned!
For further information please contact helpdesk[at]openaire.eu

fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Hanna, R
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Languages: English
Types: Part of book or chapter of book
This inquiry researches the impact of digital tools on the design process and empirically tests the association between computer aided design tools and each of cognition and creativity in architectural practice. The paper analyses the ‘design-tool’ relationship and reviews research in the field of computers as an instrument for creativity, examines their deductions and conducts a case study. Statistical analysis of the case study suggests that three measures of creativity correlated significantly with the length of time a subject spends using the computer in design: rho=0.487, P<0.05 for elaboration of design ideas; rho=0.605, P<0.05, for volume of ideas; rho=0.687, P<0.05, for ideation variety. Also, the length of designer-computer interaction seems to scaffold various forms of design reasoning and help cognition: rho=0.591, P<0.05. The study found little evidence to support the notion that computers prevent other forms of knowing.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 26. Amabile, T.: Social psychology of creativity: a consensual assessment technique, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997-1013 (1982)
    • 33. Asanowics, A.: How to find ideas? Computer-aided creativity, in Architecture in Computro, 26th eCAADe conference, Antwerp, Belgium (2008)
    • 34. Bryman, A. and Cramer, D.: Quantitative data analysis for social scientists, Routledge, London, 189 (1994)
    • 30. Candy, L.: Computer and creativity support, Knowledge Based Systems, 10, 3- 13 (1997)
    • 32. Chien, S. F. and Yeh, Y. T.: On creativity and parametric design, in Digital Physicality, 30th eCAADe conference, Czech Technical University, Prague (2012)
    • 4. Clark, A. and Chalmers, D.: The extended mind, Analysis, 58, 7-19 (1998)
    • 23. Datta, L. E.: Remote associates test as a predictor of creativity in engineers, Journal of Applied Psychology, 48, 183 (1964)
    • 7. Dewey, J.: Experience and nature, Courier Dover Publications, New York, viii123 (1958)
    • 29. Elam, J. and Mead, M.: Can software influence creativity? Information Systems Research, 1, 1-23 (1990)
    • 9. Friesen, N.: Mind and machine: ethical and epistemological implications for research, AI and Society, 25, 83-92 (2010)
    • 35. Graves, M.: Architecture and the lost art of drawing, New York Times, 2.9.(2012)
    • 31. Hanna, R. and Barber, T.: An inquiry into computers in design: attitudes before-attitudes after, Design Studies, 22, 255-281(2001)
    • Heath, T.: 1984, Method in architecture, John Wiley and Sons, London, Chapter 1.
    • 19. Heidegger, M.: The question concerning technology, in D. Krell (ed.), Martin Heidegger: Basic Writings, Harper Collins, San Francisco, 321 (1993)
    • 1. Hornecker, E.: Sketches, drawings, diagrams, physical models, prototypes, and gesture as representational forms, paper presented in Physicality 2007, The Second International Physicality Workshop, University of Lancaster, UK (2007)
    • 5. Janke, R.: Architectural models, Academy Editions, London (1978)
    • 8. Janney, R.: Computers and psychosis, in human interfaces questions of method and practice in J. Marsh, B. Gorayska and J. Mey (eds.), Cognitive technology, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 71-79 (1999)
    • 15. Johnson-Laird, P.: Mental models: Toward a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference and Consciousness, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 4 (1983)
    • 11. Jonassen, D.: The mediation of experience, Educational Technology and Communication Journal (ECTJ), 32, 153-167 (1984)
    • 12. Jonassen, D., Carr, C. and Yueh, H.: Computers as mind tools for engaging learners in critical thinking, Tech Trends, 43, 24-32 (1998)
    • 14. Jonassen, D. and Cho, Y. H.: Externalizing mental models with mindtools, in D. Ifenthaler, P. P. Dummer and M. Spector (eds.), Understanding Models for Learning and Instructions, Springer Science + Business Media LLC, New York, 145-159 (2008)
    • 10. Jonassen, D. and Strobel, J.: Modelling for meaningful learning, in D. Hung and M. Khine (eds.), Engaged learning with emerging technologies, Springer, The Netherlands, 1-27 (2006)
    • 27. MacKinnon, D.: The nature and nurture of creative talent, American Psychologist, 17, 484-495 (1962)
    • 28. Karlins, M., Schuerhoff, C. and Kaplan, M.: Some factors related to architectural creativity in graduating architecture students, Journal of General Psychology, 81, 203-215 (1969)
    • 22. Mednic, S.: The associative basis of the creative process, Psychological Review, 69, 220-232 (1962)
    • 17. Moore, D.: Technology literacy: the extension of cognition, International Journal of Technology Design Education, 21,185-193 (2011)
    • 6. Novak, M.: Next Babylon, Soft Babylon, in N. Spiller (ed.), Architects in Cyberspace II, Architectural Design, 68, 20-30 (1998)
    • 20. Posngratz, C. and Perbellini, M.: Natural Born CAADesigners, Birkhauser, Switzerland, 5-30 (2000)
    • 21. Rahim, A.: Contemporary processes in architecture, Architectural Design, 70, 6-11 (2000)
    • 18. Rosenberger, R.: The sudden experience of the computer, AI and Society, 24, 173-180 (2009)
    • 25. Runco, M. and Chand, I.: Cognition and Creativity, Educational Psychology Review, 7, 243-267 (1995)
    • 13.Salomon, G., Perkins, D. and Globerson, T.: Partners in cognition: extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies, Educational Researcher, 20, 2-9 (1991)
    • 2. Schweikardt, E. and Gross, M.: Digital clay: deriving digital models from freehand sketches, Automation in Construction, 9,107-115 (2000)
    • 16. Spector, M. and Kinshuk: Learning to solve problems in the digital age: introduction, in D. Ifenthaler, P. Isaias, M. Spector, Kinshuk and D. Sampson (eds.), Multiple perspectives on problem solving and learning in the digital age, Springer Science + Business Media LLC, New York , 1-11 (2011)
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
More information Ok