Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Journal: PLoS Medicine
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Research Article, Research Design, Elderly, Professions, Exercise, Biomechanics, Population Groupings, Sports Science, People and Places, Public and Occupational Health, Physical Fitness, Walking, Health Care Providers, Health Care, Biological Locomotion, Biology and Life Sciences, Research and Analysis Methods, Clinical Research Design, Physiology, Medicine, Adverse Events, Nurses, Age Groups, Physical Activity, Disabilities, R, Sports and Exercise Medicine, Primary Care, Medicine and Health Sciences
BACKGROUND: Pedometers can increase walking and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) levels, but their effectiveness with or without support has not been rigorously evaluated. We assessed the effectiveness of a pedometer-based walking intervention in predominantly inactive adults, delivered by post or through primary care nurse-supported physical activity (PA) consultations. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A parallel three-arm cluster randomised trial was randomised by household, with 12-mo follow-up, in seven London, United Kingdom, primary care practices. Eleven thousand fifteen randomly selected patients aged 45-75 y without PA contraindications were invited. Five hundred forty-eight self-reporting achieving PA guidelines were excluded. One thousand twenty-three people from 922 households were randomised between 2012-2013 to one of the following groups: usual care (n = 338); postal pedometer intervention (n = 339); and nurse-supported pedometer intervention (n = 346). Of these, 956 participants (93%) provided outcome data (usual care n = 323, postal n = 312, nurse-supported n = 321). Both intervention groups received pedometers, 12-wk walking programmes, and PA diaries. The nurse group was offered three PA consultations. Primary and main secondary outcomes were changes from baseline to 12 mo in average daily step-counts and time in MVPA (in ≥10-min bouts), respectively, measured objectively by accelerometry. Only statisticians were masked to group. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. Average baseline daily step-count was 7,479 (standard deviation [s.d.] 2,671), and average time in MVPA bouts was 94 (s.d. 102) min/wk. At 12 mo, mean steps/d, with s.d. in parentheses, were as follows: control 7,246 (2,671); postal 8,010 (2,922); and nurse support 8,131 (3,228). PA increased in both intervention groups compared with the control group; additional steps/d were 642 for postal (95% CI 329-955) and 677 for nurse support (95% CI 365-989); additional MVPA in bouts (min/wk) were 33 for postal (95% CI 17-49) and 35 for nurse support (95% CI 19-51). There were no significant differences between the two interventions at 12 mo. The 10% (1,023/10,467) recruitment rate was a study limitation. CONCLUSIONS: A primary care pedometer-based walking intervention in predominantly inactive 45- to 75-y-olds increased step-counts by about one-tenth and time in MVPA in bouts by about one-third. Nurse and postal delivery achieved similar 12-mo PA outcomes. A primary care pedometer intervention delivered by post or with minimal support could help address the public health physical inactivity challenge. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: isrctn.com ISRCTN98538934.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Department of Health. Start Active, Stay Active: A report on physical activity for health from the four home countries' Chief Medical Officers. 2011.
    • 2. Lee IM, Shiroma EJ, Lobelo F, Puska P, Blair SN, Katzmarzyk PT. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet. 2012; 380(9838):219±29. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61031-9 PMID: 22818936
    • 3. Carlson SA, Fulton JE, Pratt M, Yang Z, Adams EK. Inadequate physical activity and health care expenditures in the United States. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2015; 57(4):315±23. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2014.08. 002 PMID: 25559060
    • 4. World Health Organisation. Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. 2010 2010.
    • 5. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services 2008 physical activity guidelines for Americans. Washington D.C. United States.
    • 6. Sparling PB, Howard BJ, Dunstan DW, Owen N. Recommendations for physical activity in older adults. BMJ. 2015; 350:h100. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h100 PMID: 25608694
    • 7. Morris JN, Hardman AE. Walking to health. Sports Med. 1997; 23(5):306±32. PMID: 9181668
    • 8. Marshall SJ, Levy SS, Tudor-Locke CE, Kolkhorst FW, Wooten KM, Ji M, et al. Translating physical activity recommendations into a pedometer-based step goal: 3000 steps in 30 minutes. Am J Prev Med. 2009; 36(5):410±415. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.01.021 PMID: 19362695
    • 9. Yates T, Davies M, Gorely T, Bull F, Khunti K. Effectiveness of a pragmatic education program designed to promote walking activity in individuals with impaired glucose tolerance: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2009; 32(8):1404±10. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0130 PMID: 19602539
    • 10. Hobbs N, Godfrey A, Lara J, Errington L, Meyer TD, Rochester L, et al. Are behavioral interventions effective in increasing physical activity at 12 to 36 months in adults aged 55 to 70 years? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med. 2013; 11:75. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-75 PMID: 23506544
    • 11. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Behaviour change: individual approaches. 2014.
    • 12. Heath GW, Parra DC, Sarmiento OL, Andersen LB, Owen N, Goenka S, et al. Evidence-based intervention in physical activity: lessons from around the world. Lancet. 2012; 380(9838):272±81. doi: 10.1016/ S0140-6736(12)60816-2 PMID: 22818939
    • 13. Richards J, Hillsdon M, Thorogood M, Foster C. Face-to-face interventions for promoting physical activity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 9:CD010392.
    • 14. Richards J, Thorogood M, Hillsdon M, Foster C. Face-to-face versus remote and web 2.0 interventions for promoting physical activity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 9:CD010393.
    • 15. Ogilvie D, Foster CE, Rothnie H, Cavill N, Hamilton V, Fitzsimons CF, et al. Interventions to promote walking: systematic review. BMJ. 2007; 334(7605):1204. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39198.722720.BE PMID: 17540909
    • 16. Bravata DM, Smith-Spangler C, Sundaram V, Gienger AL, Lin N, Lewis R, et al. Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review. JAMA. 2007; 298(19):2296±304. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.19.2296 PMID: 18029834
    • 17. Kang M, Marshall SJ, Barreira TV, Lee JO. Effect of pedometer-based physical activity interventions: a meta-analysis. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2009; 80(3):648±55. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2009.10599604 PMID: 19791652
    • 18. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Public Health Intervention Guidance Physical Activity: brief advice for adults in primary care: component 2 economic analysis. Economic modelling of brief advice on physical activity for adults in primary care. London: 2012
    • 19. McMurdo ME, Sugden J, Argo I, Boyle P, Johnston DW, Sniehotta FF, et al. Do pedometers increase physical activity in sedentary older women? A randomized controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010; 58 (11):2099±106. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03127.x PMID: 21054290
    • 20. Mutrie N, Doolin O, Fitzsimons CF, Grant PM, Granat M, Grealy M, et al. Increasing older adults' walking through primary care: results of a pilot randomized controlled trial. Fam Pract. 2012.
    • 21. Harris T, Kerry SM, Victor CR, Ekelund U, Woodcock A, Iliffe S, et al. A primary care nurse-delivered walking intervention in older adults: PACE (pedometer accelerometer consultation evaluation)-Lift cluster randomised controlled trial. PLoS Med. 2015; 12(2):e1001783. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001783 PMID: 25689364
    • 22. Pavey TG, Taylor AH, Fox KR, Hillsdon M, Anokye N, Campbell JL, et al. Effect of exercise referral schemes in primary care on physical activity and improving health outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2011; 343:d6462. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d6462 PMID: 22058134
    • 23. Harris T, Kerry SM, Victor CR, Shah SM, Iliffe S, Ussher M, et al. PACE-UP (Pedometer and consultation evaluationÐUP)Ða pedometer-based walking intervention with and without practice nurse support in primary care patients aged 45±75 years: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2013; 14:418. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-418 PMID: 24304838
    • 24. Lawton BA, Rose SB, Elley CR, Dowell AC, Fenton A, Moyes SA. Exercise on prescription for women aged 40±74 recruited through primary care: two year randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2008; 337: a2509. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a2509 PMID: 19074218
    • 25. Normansell R, Holmes R, Victor C, Cook DG, Kerry S, Iliffe S, et al. Exploring non-participation in primary care physical activity interventions: PACE-UP trial interview findings. Trials. 2016; 17(1):178.
    • 26. Normansell R, Smith J, Victor C, Cook DG, Kerry S, Iliffe S, et al. Numbers are not the whole story: a qualitative exploration of barriers and facilitators to increased physical activity in a primary care based walking intervention. BMC Public Health. 2014; 14.
    • 27. Beighton C, Victor C, Normansell R, Cook D, Kerry S, Iliffe S, et al. "It's not just about walking.....it's the practice nurse that makes it work": a qualitative exploration of the views of practice nurses delivering complex physical activity interventions in primary care. BMC Public Health. 2015; 15(1):1236.
    • 28. Freedson PS, Melanson E, Sirard J. Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998; 30(5):777±81. PMID: 9588623
    • 29. Matthews CE, Chen KY, Freedson PS, Buchowski MS, Beech BM, Pate RR, et al. Amount of time spent in sedentary behaviors in the United States, 2003±2004. Am J Epidemiol. 2008; 167(7):875±81. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm390 PMID: 18303006
    • 30. Fitzsimons CF, Baker G, Gray SR, Nimmo MA, Mutrie N. Does physical activity counselling enhance the effects of a pedometer-based intervention over the long-term: 12-month findings from the Walking for Wellbeing in the west study. BMC Public Health. 2012; 12:206. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-206 PMID: 22429600
    • 31. Leung W, Ashton T, Kolt GS, Schofield GM, Garrett N, Kerse N, et al. Cost-effectiveness of pedometerbased versus time-based Green Prescriptions: the Healthy Steps Study. Aust J Prim Health. 2012; 18 (3):204±11. doi: 10.1071/PY11028 PMID: 23069363
    • 32. Marcus BH, Lewis BA, Hogan J, King TK, Albrecht AE, Bock B, et al. The efficacy of moderate-intensity exercise as an aid for smoking cessation in women: a randomized controlled trial. Nicotine Tob Res. 2005; 7(6):871±80. doi: 10.1080/14622200500266056 PMID: 16298722
    • 33. Ashford S, Edmunds J, French DP. What is the best way to change self-efficacy to promote lifestyle and recreational physical activity? A systematic review with meta-analysis. Br J Health Psychol. 2010; 15(Pt 2):265±88. doi: 10.1348/135910709X461752 PMID: 19586583
    • 34. Cox KL, Flicker L, Almeida OP, Xiao J, Greenop KR, Hendriks J, et al. The FABS trial: a randomised control trial of the effects of a 6-month physical activity intervention on adherence and long-term physical activity and self-efficacy in older adults with memory complaints. Prev Med. 2013; 57(6):824±30. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.09.010 PMID: 24076011
    • 35. National Institute for Health and Clinical E. Walking and cycling. Local measures to promote walking and cycling as forms of travel or recreation. 2012.
    • 36. Tully MA, Cupples ME, Chan WS, McGlade K, Young IS. Brisk walking, fitness, and cardiovascular risk: a randomized controlled trial in primary care. Prev Med. 2005; 41(2):622±8. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004. 11.030 PMID: 15917061
    • 37. Health Checks Programme NHS: Putting prevention first: NHS Health Checks: Vascular Risk Assessment and management best Practice Guidelines. London: 2009.
    • 38. NHS England Preventing Type 2 Diabetes in England. Healthier You: NHS Diabetes Prevention programme (NHS DPP) 2015. https://www.england.nhs.uk/ourwork/qual-clin-lead/action-for-diabetes/ diabetes-prevention
    • 39. Zheng H, Orsini N, Amin J, Wolk A, Nguyen VT, Ehrlich F. Quantifying the dose-response of walking in reducing coronary heart disease risk: meta-analysis. Eur J Epidemiol. 2009; 24(4):181±92. doi: 10. 1007/s10654-009-9328-9 PMID: 19306107
    • 40. Dwyer T, Pezic A, Sun C, Cochrane J, Venn A, Srikanth V, et al. Objectively Measured Daily Steps and Subsequent Long Term All-Cause Mortality: The Tasped Prospective Cohort Study. PLoS ONE. 2015; 10(11):e0141274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141274 PMID: 26536618
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article