LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
An economic study was conducted alongside a clinical trial at three sites in Pakistan to establish the costs and effectiveness of different strategies for implementing directly observed treatment (DOT) for tuberculosis. Patients were randomly allocated to one of three arms: DOTS with direct observation by health workers (at health centres or by community health workers); DOTS with direct observation by family members; and DOTS without direct observation. The clinical trial found no statistically significant difference in cure rate for the different arms. \ud \ud The economic study collected data on the full range of health service costs and patient costs of the different treatment arms. Data were also disaggregated by gender, rural and urban patients, by treatment site and by economic categories, to investigate the costs of the different strategies, their cost-effectiveness and the impact that they might have on patient compliance with treatment. \ud \ud The study found that direct observation by health centre-based health workers was the least cost-effective of the strategies tested (US$310 per case cured). This is an interesting result, as this is the model recommended by the World Health Organization and International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. Attending health centres daily during the first 2 months generated high patient costs (direct and in terms of time lost), yet cure rates for this group fell below those of the non-observed group (58%, compared with 62%). One factor suggested by this study is that the high costs of attending may be deterring patients, and in particular, economically active patients who have most to lose from the time taken by direct observation. \ud \ud Without stronger evidence of benefits, it is hard to justify the costs to health services and patients that this type of direct observation imposes. The self-administered group came out as most cost-effective ($164 per case cured). The community health worker sub-group achieved the highest cure rates (67%), with a cost per case only slightly higher than the self-administered group ($172 per case cured). This approach should be investigated further, along with other approaches to improving patient compliance.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Floyd K, Wilkinson D, Gilks C. 1997. Comparison of costeffectiveness of directly observed treatment (DOT) and conventionally delivered treatment for tuberculosis: experience from rural South Africa. British Medical Journal 315: 1407-11.
    • Kamolratanakul P, Sawert H, Lertmaharit S et al. 1999. Randomized controlled trial of directly observed treatment (DOT) for patients with pulmonary tuberculosis in Thailand. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 93: 552-7.
    • Khan A, Walley J, Newell J, Imdad N. 2000. Tuberculosis in Pakistan: socio-cultural constraints and opportunities in treatment. Social Science and Medicine 50: 247-54.
    • Volminck J, Matchaba P, Garner P. 2000. Directly observed therapy and treatment adherence. The Lancet 355: 1345-50.
    • Walley J, Amir Khan M, Newell J, Hussain Khan M. 2001. Effectiveness of the direct observation component of DOTS for tuberculosis: a randomised controlled trial in Pakistan. The Lancet 357: 664-9.
    • Wilkinson D, Davies G. 1997. Coping with Africa's increasing tuberculosis burden: are community supervisors an essential component of the DOT strategy? Tropical Medicine and International Health 2: 700-4.
    • Zwarenstein M, Schoeman J, Vundule C, Lombard C, Tatley M. 2000. A randomised controlled trial of lay health workers as direct observers for treatment of tuberculosis. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 4: 550-4.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article