LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: SAGE
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
The spaces that surveillance produces can be thought of as ambiguous, entailing elements that are ethereal yet material, geographical yet trans-geographical. Contemporary surveillance systems form numerous connections that involve multiple times, spaces, and bodies. Owing to their ubiquity, normalization, and yet clandestine characteristics, they seem to produce an almost unnoticed aspect of everyday life. The impacts, then, of contemporary surveillance systems appear to be particularly experienced on the margins of consciousness. Thus we find that an empirical analysis of this realm of experience is possible but requires one to look for such things as disruption, disfluency, and hesitation in the text of speech acts rather than clear representation. Through empirical analysis of narratives concerning everyday experiences of living with contemporary surveillance systems, this paper focuses on their possible affective impacts. In turn, we find it more fitting to think about the so-called “surveillance society” in terms of producing “atmospheres” rather than “cultures or assemblages,” and “affects” rather than “emotions.”
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Minton, A. (2009). Ground control: Fear and happiness in the twenty-first-century city. London, UK: Penguin Books.
    • Rose, G. (1993). A politics of paradoxical space. Feminism and geography: The limits of geographical knowledge, 137(60), 184-202.
    • Solove, D. J. (2007). I've got nothing to hide and other misunderstandings of privacy. San Diego Law Review, 44, 745.
    • Stenner, P. (2008). A. N. Whitehead and subjectivity. Subjectivity, 22, 90-109.
    • Webster, W. R., & Murakami Wood, D. (2009). Living in surveillance societies: The normalisation of surveillance in Europe and the threat of Britain's bad example. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 5(2), 259-273.
    • Wetherell, M. (2012). Affect and emotion: A new social science understanding. London, UK: Sage.
    • Wood, D. (Ed.), Ball, K., Lyon, D., Norris, C., & Raab, C. (2006). A report on the surveillance society. Wilmslow, UK: Office of the Information Commissioner/Surveillance Studies Network. Retrieved from: http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/data_protection/practical_application/surveilla nce_society_full_report_2006.pdf
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article