LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: Biomed Central
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: education
Background: Internet-based depression communities provide a forum for individuals to\ud communicate and share information and ideas. There has been little research into the health status\ud and other characteristics of users of these communities.\ud Methods: Online cross-sectional survey of Internet depression communities to identify depressive\ud morbidity among users of Internet depression communities in six European countries; to\ud investigate whether users were in contact with health services and receiving treatment; and to\ud identify user perceived effects of the communities.\ud Results: Major depression was highly prevalent among respondents (varying by country from 40%\ud to 64%). Forty-nine percent of users meeting criteria for major depression were not receiving\ud treatment, and 35% had no consultation with health services in the previous year. Thirty-six\ud percent of repeat community users who had consulted a health professional in the previous year\ud felt that the Internet community had been an important factor in deciding to seek professional help.\ud Conclusions: There are high levels of untreated and undiagnosed depression in users of Internet\ud depression communities. This group represents a target for intervention. Internet communities can\ud provide information and support for stigmatizing conditions that inhibit more traditional modes of\ud information seeking.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Powell J, Clarke A: The WWW of the World Wide Web: Who, What, and Why? J Med Internet Res 2002, 4:e4.
    • 2. Fox S, Rainie L: Vital Decisions: How internet users decide what information to trust when they or their loved ones are sick. Washington, DC: The Pew Internet & American Life Project 2002.
    • 3. Pleace N, Burrows R, Loader B, Muncer S, Nettleton S: On-Line With the Friends of Bill W: Social Support and the Net. Sociological Research Online 2000, 5:U134-U148.
    • 4. Glasgow RE, Barrera M, Mckay HG, Boles SM: Social Support and Health Among Participants in an Internet-Based Diabetes Support Program: a Multi-Dimensional Investigation. Diabetes 1998, 47:1263.
    • 5. White H, Mcconnell E, Clipp E, Bynum L, Teague C, Navas L et al.: Surfing the Net in Later Life: a Review of the Literature and Pilot Study of Computer Use and Quality of Life. Journal of Applied Gerontology 1999, 18:358-378.
    • 6. Klemm P, Bunnell D, Cullen M, Soneji R, Gibbons P, Holecek A: Online cancer support groups: a review of the research literature. Comput Inform Nurs 2003, 21:136-142.
    • 7. White M, Dorman SM: Receiving social support online: implications for health education. Health Educ Res 2001, 16:693-707.
    • 8. Agrell H, Walinder J: Halsotjanst pa Internet kan ge deprimerade stod [Internet health-care service can provide support for depressed individuals]. L√§kartidningen 2002, 99:4152-7.
    • 9. Houston T, Cooper L, Ford D: Internet support groups for depression: a 1-year prospective cohort study. Am J Psychiatry 2002, 159:2062-2068.
    • 10. Kummervold PE, Gammon D, Bergvik S, Johnsen JA, Hasvold T, Rosenvinge JH: Social support in a wired world: use of online mental health forums in Norway. Nord J Psychiatry 2002, 56:59-65.
    • 11. Bech P, Rasmussen NA, Olsen LR, Noerholm V, Abildgaard W: The sensitivity and specificity of the Major Depression Inventory, using the Present State Examination as the index of diagnostic validity. J Affect Disord 2001, 66:159-64.
    • 12. US Preventive Services Task Force: Screening for depression: recommendations and rationale. Ann Intern Med 2002, 136:760-4.
    • 13. Magnusson A: An overview of epidemiological studies on seasonal affective disorder. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2000, 101:176-184.
    • 14. Piccinelli M, Wilkinson G: Gender differences in depression. Critical review. Brit J Psychiatry 2000, 177:486-492.
    • 15. Fox S, Rainie L: The online health care revolution: how the Web helps Americans take better care of themselves. Washington, DC, The Pew Internet & American Life Project 2000.
    • 16. Eysenbach G, Wyatt J: Using the Internet for Surveys and Health Research. J Med Internet Res 2002, 4:e13.
    • 17. Schonlau M, Fricker R, Elliott M: Conducting Research Surveys via E-mail and the Web. California, Rand Corporation 2002.
    • 18. Patten SB: International differences in major depression prevalence: what do they mean? J Clin Epidemiol 2003, 56:711-716.
    • 19. Weissman MM, Bland RC, Canino GJ, Faravelli C, Greenwald S, Hwu HG et al.: Cross-national epidemiology of major depression and bipolar disorder. JAMA 1996, 276:293-299.
    • 20. Department of Mental Health and Substance Dependence: Mental Health Resources in the World. Project ATLAS. Geneva, World Health Organization 2002.
    • 21. Christensen H, Griffiths KM, Korten A: Web-based cognitive behavior therapy: analysis of site usage and changes in depression and anxiety scores. J Med Internet Res 2002, 4:e3.
    • 22. Eysenbach G: Issues in evaluating health websites in an Internet-based randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2002, 4:e17.
    • 23. Feldman M: Munchausen by Internet: detecting factitious illness and crisis on the Internet. South Med J 2000, 93:669-672.
    • 24. Desai S, Dole E, Yeatman S, Troutman W: Evaluation of drug information in an Internet newsgroup. J Am Pharm Assoc 1997, NS37:391-394.
    • 25. Kraut R, Patterson M, Lundmark V, Kiesler S, Mukopadhyay T, Scherlis W: Internet paradox. A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? Am Psychol 1998, 53:1017-31.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article