LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: H, J
Despite a peak in activism against climate change in the UK, new environmental direct action networks have not yet received much academic attention. This article takes as a case study perhaps the most prominent of such networks – the Camp for Climate Action – which held several high-profile protest events between 2006 and 2011. Using a theoretical framework which understands society as being distinctly ‘post-political’ in character, we ask questions about the knowledge claims that form the foundations of radical environmental politics. Drawing on published statements and press releases, as well as from our insights as active participants in the Camp, we analyse the strategy of environmental protest where climate change has become its focus. The Camp for Climate Action was a contested political arena. We argue that this contestation existed over the Camp’s strategy in the context of a ‘scientised’, ‘post- political’ politics which operated\ud within an ethical framework that prescribed individual responsibility as the primary basis for action.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Abbott, D., 2009. The State Climate Camp's In, Mute Magazine [online], http://www.metamute.org/en/content/the_state_climate_camps_in [Accessed 11 May 2011].
    • Adams, D., 2009. Leading climate scientist: 'democratic process isn't working'. The Guardian [online], http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2009/mar/18/nasa-climate-change-james-hansen [Accessed 11 May 2011].
    • Andrew X., 1999. Give Up Activism. In: Reclaim The Streets, eds. Reflections on J18. London: RTS, 2-6.
    • Badiou, A., 2005. Meta-Politics. London: Verso.
    • Beck, U., 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
    • Beck, U., 2009. World at Risk. Cambridge, Polity Press.
    • Blumer, H., 1969. Collective Behaviour. In: A. McClung-Lee, ed.. Principles of Sociology. New York: Barnes and Noble, 67-121.
    • Bolin, B., 2007. A history of the science and politics of climate change: the role of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Bourdieu, P., 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Bourdieu, P., 1992. The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    • Bowman A., 2010. Are we armed only with peer-reviewed science? The scientization of politics in the radical environmental movement. In: S. Skrimshire ed. Future ethics: climate change and the apocalyptic imagination. London: Continuum, 173 - 196.
    • Dobson, A., 2009. 10:10 and the Politics of Climate Change. OpenDemocra cy [online] http://www.opendemocracy.net/article/10-10-and-the-politics-of-climate-change [Accessed 11 May 2011].
    • Doherty, B., 1999. Paving the Way: the Rise of Direct Action and the Changing Character of British Environmentalism. Political Studies, (47) 2, 275-291.
    • Eyerman, R. and Jamison, A., 1991. Social Movements: A Cognitive Approach. Cambridge: Polity.
    • Latour, B., 2004. Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
    • Lockhart, A., 2009. Optimum Population Trust: a rebirth of 1970s survivalism, or something new?. In-Spire: Journal of Law, Politics and Societies, 4 (1), 19-39.
    • Lohmann, L., 2008. Carbon Trading, Climate Justice and the Production of Ignorance: Ten Examples. Development 51, 359-365.
    • Mason, P., 2004. Looking to the Hydrogen Horizon. BBC News [online], http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3675760.stm [Accessed 11 May 2011].
    • Melucci, A., 1986. Noma ds of the Present. London: Radius.
    • Melucci, A., 1996. Challenging Codes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • O'Reilly, J., Brysse, K., Oppenheimer, M., Oreskes, N., 2011. Characterising uncertainty in expert assessments: ozone depletion and the West Antarctic ice sheet. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change. 2, 728-743.
    • Oreskes N., Conway E., 2010. Merchants of doubt: how a handful of scientists obscured the truth on Issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. New York: Bloomsbury Books Parson, E.A., Karwat, D., 2011. Sequential climate change policy. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 2, 744-756..
    • Readhead, P., 2007. Climate camps and campaign democracy. Economic and Social Research Council: News Articles [online].
    • Touraine, A., 1981. The Voice and the Eye: An Analysis of Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Valentine, J., 2005. Rancière and Contemporary Political Problems, Paragraph, 28(1), 4-59.
    • Vaneigem, R., 1994. The Revolution of Everyda y Life. London: RebelPress.
    • Webster, M., et al., 2011. Analysis of climate policy targets under uncertainty. Climatic Change, 104, 515-537.
    • Weichselgartner J., Kasperson R., 2010. Barriers in the science-policy-practice interface: toward a knowledge-action-system in global environmental change research. Global Environmental Change, 20, 266-277.
    • Woodsworth, A., 2008. Growth in the UK Climate Direct Action Movement: Experience, Politics and Practice, Thesis (PhD). University of East Anglia.
    • Yearly, S., 1992. Green Ambivalence about Science: Legal-Rational Authority and the Scientific Legitimation of a Social Movement. The British Journal of Sociology, 43 (4), 511-532.
    • Yearley, S., 1996. Nature's advocates: putting science to work in environmental organisations.
    • In: Irwin, A., Wynne, B., eds. Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 172-190.
    • Yearly, S., 2008. Environmental action groups and other NGOs as communicators of science. In: Bucchi, M., Trench, B., eds. Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology.
    • London: Routledge, 159-171.
    • Zizek, S., 1999. Mapping Ideology. London: Verso.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article