LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: Springer
Journal: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Back pain, Clinical effectiveness, Cost effectiveness, Article, General practice, Certification, R1

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: health care economics and organizations
Purpose Back pain is a common problem and has significant societal impact. Sickness certification is commonly issued to patients consulting their general practitioner with low back pain. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of certification for low back pain with clinical outcomes and cost consequences. Methods A prospective cohort study using linked questionnaire and medical record data from 806 low back pain patients in 8 UK general practices: comparison of 116 (14.4?%) who received a sickness certificate versus 690 who did not receive certification. The primary clinical measure was the Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). Data on back pain consultation and work absenteeism were used to calculate healthcare and societal costs. Results Participants issued a sickness certificate had higher back-related disability at baseline consultation and 6-month follow-up [mean difference 3.1 (95?%?CI 1.8, 4.4) on the RMDQ], indicating worse health status. After fully adjusting for baseline differences, most changes in clinical outcomes at 6?months were not significantly different between study groups. Productivity losses were significantly higher for the certification group, with most absence occurring after the expected end of certification; mean difference in costs due to absenteeism over 6?months was ?1,956 (95?%?CI ?941, ?3040). Conclusions There was no clear evidence of a difference in clinical outcomes between individuals issued a sickness certificate and those not issued a certification for their back pain. With little overall contrast in clinical outcomes, policy makers and care providers may wish to draw on the likely difference in societal costs alongside issues in ethical and moral care in their consideration of patient care for low back pain.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Urwin M, Symmonds D, Allison T, Brammah T, Busby H, Roxby M, Simmons A, Williams G. Estimating the burden of musculoskeletal disorders in the community: the comparative prevalence of symptoms at different anatomical sites, and the relation to social deprivation. Ann Rheum Dis. 1998;11(57): 649-55.
    • 2. Jordan KP, Kadam UT, Hayward R, Porcheret M, Young C, Croft PR. Annual consultation prevalence of regional musculoskeletal problems in primary care: an observational study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:144.
    • 3. Maniadakis N, Gray A. The economic burden of back pain in the UK. Pain. 2000;1(84):95-103.
    • 4. Englund L, Svardsudd K. Sick-listing habits among general practitioners in a Swedish county. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2000;18(2):81-6.
    • 5. Shiels C, Gabbay M. The influence of GP and patient gender interaction on the duration of certified sickness absence. Fam Pract. 2006;23:246-52.
    • 6. Wynne-Jones G, Mallen CD, Mottram S, Main CJ, Dunn KM. The identification of U.K. sickness certification rates, standardised for age and sex. Brit J Gen Pract. 2009;59(564):510-6.
    • 7. Confederation of British Industry. Health returns? Absence and Workplace Health Survey; 2011. http://www.cbi.org.uk/media/ 955604/2011.05-healthy_returns_-_absence_and_workplace_ health_survey_2011.pdf.
    • 8. Valat JP, Goupille P, Vedere V. Low back pain: risk factors for chronicity. Rev Rheum Engl Ed. 1997;64(3):189-94.
    • 9. Wynne-Jones G, Mallen CD, Dunn KM. Sickness certification for musculoskeletal conditions. Clin Rheumatol. 2010;29:573-4.
    • 10. Waddell G, Burton AK. Is work good for your health and wellbeing? London: TSO; 2006.
    • 11. Borg K, Hensing G, Alexanderson K. Predictive factors for disability pension, an 11 year follow up of young persons on sick leave due to neck, shoulder or back diagnoses. Scand J Public Health. 2001;29(2):104-12.
    • 12. Aas RW, Ellingsen KL, Lindoe P, Moller A. Leadership qualities in the return to work process: a content analysis. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;12(18):335-46.
    • 13. Krokstad S, Johnsen R, Westin S. Social determinants of disability pension in long-term sickness absence: a 10-year followup of 62,000 people in a Norwegian country population. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31(6):1183-91.
    • 14. Gjesdal S, Ringdal PR, Haug K, Maeland JG. Predictors of disability pension in long-term sickness absence: results from a population-based and prospective study in Norway 1994-1999. Eur J Public Health. 2004;14(4):398-405.
    • 15. Karlsson NE, Carstensen JM, Gjesdal S, Alexanderson KA. Risk factors for disability pension in a population-based cohort of men and women on long-term sick leave in Sweden. Eur J Public Health. 2008;18(3):224-31.
    • 16. Frank AO, De Souza LH. Conservative management of low back pain. Int J Clin Pract. 2001;55:21-3.
    • 17. Health and Safety Executive. Working together to prevent sickness absence becoming job loss; 2002. http://www.hse.gov.uk/ pubns/web02.pdf. Accessed July 2014.
    • 18. Department of Health, Health and Safety Executive, Department for Work and Pensions. Health, work and well-being-caring for our future; 2005.
    • 19. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Managing long-term sickness absence and incapacity for work. NICE public health guidance 19. www.nice.org.uk/PH19. Accessed Sept 2009.
    • 20. Royal College of General Practitioners. Clinical guidelines for the management of low back pain. London: RCGP; 1996.
    • 21. Waddell G, McIntosh A, Hutchinson A, Feder G, Lewis M. Low back pain evidence review. London: Royal College of General Practitioners; 1999.
    • 22. Bishop A, Thomas E, Foster NE. Health care practitioners' attitudes and beliefs about low back pain: a systematic search and critical review of available measurement tools. Pain. 2007; 132(1-2):91-101.
    • 23. Gerner U, Alexanderson K. Issuing sickness certificates: a difficult task for physicians: a qualitative analysis of written statements in a Swedish survey. Scand J Public Health. 2009; 37(1):57-63.
    • 24. Soler JK, Okkes IM. Sick leave certification: an unwelcome administrative burden for the family doctor? The role of sickness certification in Maltese family practice. Eur J Gen Pract. 2004; 10(2):50-5.
    • 25. Foster NE, Bishop A, Thomas E, Main CJ, Horne R, Weinman J, Hay E. Illness perceptions of low back pain patients in primary care: What are they, do they change and are they associated with outcome? Pain. 2008;136(1-2):177-87.
    • 26. Foster NE, Thomas E, Bishop A, Dunn KM, Main CJ. Distinctiveness of psychological obstacles to recovery in low back pain patients in primary care. Pain. 2010;148(3):398-406.
    • 27. Bishop A, Foster NE, Thomas E, Hay EM. How does the selfreported clinical management of patients with low back pain relate to the attitudes and beliefs of health care practitioners? A survey of UK general practitioners and physiotherapists. Pain. 2008;135(1-2):187-95.
    • 28. Corbett M, Foster N, Ong BN. GP attitudes and self-reported behaviour in primary care consultations for low back pain. Fam Pract. 2009;26(5):359-64.
    • 29. Dunn KM, Croft PR. Classification of low back pain in primary care: using ''bothersomness'' to identify the most severe cases. Spine. 2005;30(16):1887-92.
    • 30. Hassey A, Gerrett D, Wilson A. A survey of validity and utility of electronic patient records in a general practice. Brit Med J. 2001;322:1401-5.
    • 31. Porcheret M, Hughes R, Evans D, Jordan K, Whitehurst T, Ogden H, Croft P, North Staffordshire General Practice Research Network. Data quality of general practice electronic health records: the impact of a program of assessments, feedback, and training. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004;11(1):78-86.
    • 32. Jordan K, Clarke AM, Symmons DP, Fleming D, Porcheret M, Kadam UT, Croft P. Measuring disease prevalence: a comparison of musculoskeletal disease using four general practice consultation databases. Brit J Gen Pract. 2007;57(534):7-14.
    • 33. Wynne-Jones G, Mallen CD, Main CJ, Dunn KM. Sickness certification in general practice: a comparison of electronic records with self-reported work absence. Prim Health Res Dev. 2008;9(2):113-8.
    • 34. Roland M, Morris R. A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine. 1983;3(8):141-4.
    • 35. Bombardier C, Hayden J, Beaton DE. Minimal clinically important difference. Low back pain: outcome measures. J Rheum. 2001;28(2):431-8.
    • 36. Von Korff M, Ormel J, Keefe FJ, Dworkin SF. Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain. 1992;8(50):45-52.
    • 37. The EuroQol Group. EuroQol: A new facility for the measurement of health related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16: 199-208.
    • 38. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67:361-70.
    • 39. Kori SH, Miller RP, Todd DD. Kinesophobia: a new view of chronic pain behaviour. Pain Manag. 1990;3(1):35-43.
    • 40. Rosenstiel AK, Keefe FJ. The use of coping strategies in chronic low back pain patients: relationship to patient characteristics and current adjustment. Pain. 1983;17(1):33-44.
    • 41. Nicholas MK. The Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire: taking pain into account. Eur J Pain. 2007;11:153-6.
    • 42. Office for National Statistics. Standard occupational classification. The coding index, vol. 2. London: The Stationary Office; 2000.
    • 43. Office for National Statistics. Annual survey of hours and earnings (ASHE). London: The Stationary Office; 2005.
    • 44. Thompson SG, Barber JA. How should cost data in pragmatic randomised trials be analysed? BMJ. 2000;320:1197-200.
    • 45. Korthals-de Bos I, van Tulder M, van Dieten H, Bouter L. Economic evaluations and randomized trials in spinal disorders: principles and methods. Spine. 2004;29(4):442-8.
    • 46. Kigozi JBL. The economics of back pain: alternative approaches to productivity cost estimation in economic evaluation of healthcare. Ph.D. thesis, University of Birmingham, Health Economics Unit; 2014.
    • 47. Bowling A. Research methods in health: investigating health and health services. Milton Keynes: Open University Press; 1997.
    • 48. Little RJA, Rubin DB. Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: Wiley; 1987.
    • 49. Whitehurst DG, Lewis M, Yao GL, Bryan S, Raftery JP, Mullis R, Hay EM. A brief pain management programme compared with physical therapy for low back pain: results from an economic analysis alongside a randomized clinical trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57(3):466-73.
    • 50. Wynne-Jones G, Mallen CD, Main CJ, Dunn KM. Sickness certification and the GP: What really happens in practice? Fam Pract. 2009;27(3):344-50.
    • 51. Andersson GB. Epidemiological features of chronic low back pain. Lancet. 1999;354:581-5.
    • 52. Tellnes G, Bjerkedal T. Epidemiology of sickness certificationa methodological approach based on a study from Buskerud county in Norway. Scand J Soc Med. 1989;17:245-51.
    • 53. Reiso H, Gulbramdsen P, Brage S. Doctors' prediction of certified sickness absence. Fam Pract. 2004;21(2):192-8.
    • 54. Bollag U, Rajeswaran A, Ruffieuz B. Sickness certification in primary care the physician's role. Swiss Med Wkly. 2007;137: 341-6.
    • 55. Morris J, Watson PJ. Investigating decisions to absent from work with low back pain: a study combining patient and GP factors. Eur J Pain. 2011;15(3):278-85.
    • 56. De Lusignan S, Chan T, Parry G, Dent-Brown K, Kendrick T. Referral to a new psychological service is associated with reduced utilisation of healthcare and sickness absence by people with common mental health problems: a before and after comparison. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 2012;66(6):e10Epub.
    • 57. Wynne-Jones G, Mallen CD, Welsh V, Dunn KM. Rates of sickness certification in European primary care: a systematic review. Eur J Gen Pract. 2008;14(3-4):99-108.
    • 58. Hiscock J, Ritchie J. The role of GPs in sickness certification. Leeds: Her Majesty's Stationary Office; 2001. p. 148.
    • 59. Royal Collage of General Practitioners. RCGP|Health and Work in General Practice. http://www.rcgp.org.uk/courses-and-events/ health-and-work-in-general-practice. Accessed 12 May 2012.
    • 60. Waddell G, Burton AK. Health and work. London: The Stationary Office; 2007.
    • 61. Waddell G, Burton AK. Advising patients about work. London: The Stationary Office; 2007.
    • 62. Vlaeyen JW, Linton SJ. Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a state of the art. Pain. 2000; 85(3):317-32.
    • 63. WMA Press Release. WMA revises the Declaration of Helsinki. 9 Oct 2000.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article