LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Almond, Paul James; Colover, Sarah (2010)
Publisher: Sage
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
This paper concerns an empirical investigation into public attitudes towards work-related fatality cases, where organizational offenders cause the death of workers or members of the public. This issue is particularly relevant following the introduction of the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 into UK law. Here, as elsewhere, the use of criminal law against companies reflects governmental concerns over public confidence in the law’s ability to regulate risk. The empirical findings demonstrate that high levels of public concern over these cases do not translate into punitive attitudes. Such cases are viewed rationally and constructively, and lead to instrumental rather than purely expressive enforcement preferences.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Almond, P. (2007). Regulation crisis: Evaluating the potential legitimising effects of 'corporate manslaughter' cases. Law and Policy 29, 285-310.
    • Almond, P. (2008). Public perceptions of work-related fatality cases: Reaching the outer limits of 'populist punitiveness'? British Journal of Criminology 48, 448-467.
    • Almond, P. (2009). Understanding the seriousness of corporate crime: Some lessons for the 'corporate manslaughter' reform project. Criminology and Criminal Justice 9, 145-164.
    • Bottoms, A. (1995). The philosophy and politics of punishment and sentencing. In C. Clarkson and R. Morgan (eds.) The Politics of Sentencing Reform, 17-49. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    • Braithwaite, J. (2003). What's wrong with the sociology of punishment? Theoretical Criminology 7, 5-28.
    • Clarkson, C. M. V. (2008). Corporate manslaughter: Need for a special offence? In C. Clarkson and S. Cunningham (eds.) Criminal Liability for Non-Aggressive Death, 79- 96. Aldershot: Ashgate.
    • Cullen, F. T., Link, B. G., and Polanzi, C. W. (1982). The seriousness of crime revisited: Have attitudes toward white-collar crime changed? Criminology 20, 83-102.
    • Eser, A., Heine, G., and Huber, B. (1999). Collective responsibility of legal and collective entities. Berlin: Editions Iuscrim.
    • Garland, D. (2001). The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Gobert, J. and Mugnai, E. (2002). Coping with corporate crime - some lessons from Italy. Criminal Law Review, 619-629.
    • Green, D. A. (2006). Public opinion versus public judgment about crime: Correcting the 'comedy of errors'. British Journal of Criminology 46, 131-154.
    • Hans, V. and Ermann, M. (1989). Responses to corporate versus individual wrongdoing. Law and Human Behaviour 13, 151-166.
    • Holtfreter, K., Van Slyke, S., Bratton, J., and Gertz, M. (2008). Public perceptions of whitecollar crime and punishment. Journal of Criminal Justice 36, 50-60.
    • Home Office (2005). Corporate manslaughter: The Government's draft bill for reform. London: The Stationery Office.
    • Hough, M. (1996). People talking about punishment. The Howard Journal 35, 191-214.
    • Hough, M. and Roberts, J. V. (1999). Sentencing trends in Britain: public knowledge and public opinion. Punishment & Society 1, 11-26.
    • Hutton, N. (2005). Beyond populist punitiveness? Punishment & Society 7, 243-258.
    • Judd, C. M., & Krosnick, J. A. (1989). The structural bases of consistency among political attitudes: The effects of political expertise and attitude importance. In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, & A. G. Greenwald (eds.), Attitude Structure and Function. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    • Kury, H. (2008). Fear of crime - punitivity: New developments in theory and research. Bochum: Brockmeyer.
    • Law Commission (1996). Legislating the Criminal Code: Involuntary manslaughter (Report 237). London: HMSO.
    • Livingstone, S. and Lunt, P. (2007). The politics of consumption/the consumption of politics: Representing citizens and consumers in media and communications regulation. The Annals of The American Academy of Political and Social Science 611, 51-65.
    • Matthews, R. (2005). The myth of punitiveness. Theoretical Criminology 9, 175-201.
    • Mitchell, B. (1998). Public perceptions of homicide and criminal justice. British Journal of Criminology 38, 453-472.
    • MORI (2008). Closing the Gaps: Crime and Public Perceptions. London: MORI.
    • Orland, L. and Cachera, C. (1995). Corporate crime and punishment in France: Criminal responsibility of legal entities (personnes morales) under the new French Criminal Code (Nouveau Code Penal). Connecticut Journal of International Law 11, 111-168.
    • Ormerod, D. and Taylor, R. (2008). The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007. Criminal Law Review, 589-611.
    • Pratt, J. (2002). Emotive and ostentatious punishment: Its decline and resurgence in modern society. Punishment and Society 2, 417-440.
    • Roberts, J. V. and Hough, M. (2005). Understanding public attitudes to criminal justice. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
    • Roberts, J. V., Stalans, L. J., Indemaur, D., and Hough, M. (2003). Penal populism and public opinion: Lessons from five countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Rosenmerkel, S. P. (2001). Wrongfulness and harmfulness as components of seriousness of white-collar offenses. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 17, 308-327.
    • 1 A specific offence was introduced in the Australian Capital Territory in 2004 (Sarre and Richards 2005).
    • 2 Involving Cotswold Geotechnical Holdings, a geological surveyors; The Times, 23/04/2009, at http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/law/article6155777.ece .
    • 3 Based on R v. Thames Trains Ltd . (2004), Unreported, Central Criminal Court, 05/04/2004.
    • 4 HSE (2001),The explosion of No 5 Blast Furnace, Corus UK Ltd, Port Talbot, Ref no: WEB34.
    • 5 OLL v. Secretary of State for Transport [1997] 3 All E.R. 897.
    • 6 R v. DPP and others ex parte Jones (2000), Q.B.D. 23/03/2000, Ref: CO/3008/99.
    • 7 R v. Alistair Henry Crow (2001) Court of Appeal 21/12/01.
    • 8 R v. Jackson Transport (Ossett) Ltd . (1996), Unreported, Health and Safety at Work (1996) 18/11/1996: 4.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article