LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
Subjects: QK

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: fungi, food and beverages
Floral initiation is regulated by an elaborate network of signalling pathways, including the\ud photoperiodic pathway. In Arabidopsis, flowering is promoted through this pathway by activation\ud of FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) by CONSTANS (CO) in long days. During juvenility plants are\ud incapable of flowering in response to environmental conditions that would normally be\ud favourable.\ud This project studies the molecular basis of floral incompetence during juvenility in the\ud model annual species, Antirrhinum majus and the important commercial tree species, Olea\ud europaea, which has an extended juvenile phase.\ud Photoperiod transfer experiments were used to measure the length of juvenility in plants\ud grown in controlled environment cabinets at different Daily Light Integrals. Analysis of\ud Antirrhinum FT (AmFT) expression during development showed that AmFT expression is\ud minimal during juvenility and increases in all leaves following the end of the juvenile phase. The\ud photoperiodic pathway was shown to be active during juvenility, suggesting that an additional\ud mechanism involving the repression of FT could be involved in the regulation of juvenility.\ud Full length Antirrhinum and Olive cDNAs representing homologues of the Arabidopsis FT\ud repressors TEMPRANILLO 1 (AtTEM1) and AtTEM2, which act antagonistically with CO, were\ud isolated. Molecular and phylogenetic analyses revealed high amino acid identities between\ud Antirrhinum (AmTEM) and Olive (OeTEM) TEM-like proteins and AtTEM1 & 2. AmTEM and\ud OeTEM proteins contain AP2 and B3 domains, consistent with AtTEM1 and AtTEM2, and can\ud be classified as Class I members of the RAV sub-family of B3 transcription factors.\ud AmTEM and OeTEM expression levels were shown to be higher during juvenility\ud suggesting a potential role for TEM in controlling juvenility. A reciprocal relationship between\ud expression levels of AmTEM/AtTEM1 and AmFT/AtFT was revealed in both Antirrhinum and\ud Arabidopsis. Analysis of expression across development showed that AmTEM/AtTEM1 levels\ud decline at around the time juvenility ends corresponding to when AmFT/AtFT levels start to\ud increase.\ud Arabidopsis tem1 mutants over-expressing AmTEM, OeTEM or AtTEM1 exhibited delayed\ud flowering compared to the tem1 mutant, which demonstrated their role in regulating flowering\ud time. Over-expression of AmTEM was shown to increase the length of the juvenile phase, delay\ud the induction of AtCO and AtFT expression and reduce the overall levels of AtFT expression.\ud Conversely, the juvenile phases of tem1 single and tem1/2 double mutants were shown to be\ud shorter than in wild-type plants, with the induction of AtCO and AtFT expression occurring\ud earlier.\ud These findings are consistent with a role for TEM in regulating juvenility, which occurs\ud through the down-regulation of FT and CO, and results in the inability to proceed to reproductive\ud growth.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • U. and Weigel, D. (2005). Integration of spatial and temporal information during floral induction in Arabidopsis. Science, 309, 1056-1059.
    • Wilkie, J. D., Sedgley, M. and Olesen, T. (2008). Regulation of floral initiation in horticultural trees. Journal of Experimental Botany, 59, 3215-3228.
    • Wilson, R. N., Heckman, J. W. and Somerville, C. R. (1992). Gibberellin is required for fowering in Arabidopsis thaliana under short days. Plant Physiology, 100, 403-408.
    • Woo, H. R., Kim, J. H., Kim, J., Lee, U., Song, I. J., Lee, H. Y., Nam, H. G. and Lim, P. O. (2010). The RAV1 transcription factor positively regulates leaf senescence in Arabidopsis. Journal of Experimental Botany, 61, 3947-3957.
    • (2009). The sequential action of miR156 and miR172 regulates developmental timing in Arabidopsis. Cell, 138, 750-759.
    • Yamaguchi, A., Kobayashi, Y., Goto, K., Abe, M. and Araki, T. (2005). TWIN SISTER OF FT (TSF) acts as a floral pathway integrator redundantly with FT. Plant and Cell Physiology, 46, 1175-1189.
    • Yan, Z., Liang, D., Liu, H. and Zheng, G. (2010). FLC: A key regulator of flowering time in Arabidopsis. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 57, 166-174.
    • Yang, L., Conway, S. R. and Poethig, R. S. (2011). Vegetative phase change is mediated by a leaf-derived signal that represses the transcription of miR156.
    • Development, 138, 245-249.
    • Yang, L., Liu, Z., Lu, F., Dong, A. and Huang, H. (2006). SERRATE is a novel nuclear regulator in primary microRNA processing in Arabidopsis. Plant Journal, 47, 841-850.
    • and Schmid, M. (2010). Orchestration of the floral transition and floral development in Arabidopsis by the bifunctional transcription factor APETALA2.
    • Plant Cell, 22, 2156-2170.
    • Yant, L., Mathieu, J. and Schmid, M. (2009). Just say no: floral repressors help Arabidopsis bide the time. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 12, 580-586.
    • Zhang, H., Harry, D. E., Ma, C., Yuceer, C., Hsu, C.-Y., Vikram, V., Shevchenko, O., Etherington, E. and Strauss, S. H. (2010). Precocious flowering in trees: the FLOWERING LOCUS T gene as a research and breeding tool in Populus. Journal of Experimental Botany, 61, 2549-2560.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article