LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
Subjects: P500, W600
“Phenomenology is the place where hermeneutics originates,\ud phenomenology is also the place it has left behind.”(Ricoeur )1\ud In this thesis I shall examine possibilities for bringing into dialogue the practice of social\ud documentary photography and the conceptual resources of the post-Structural and critical\ud philosophical hermeneutics of text and action developed by Paul Ricoeur (1913-2005)\ud from the 1970’s onwards. Ricoeur called this an ‘amplifying’ hermeneutics of language,\ud defined as ‘the art of deciphering indirect meaning’ (ibid).\ud Social documentary photography is an intentional activity concerned with the visual\ud interpretation, ethics and representation of life, the otherness of others, and through them\ud something about ourselves. The narratives form social histories of encounters with others.\ud They raise challenging questions of meaning and interpretation in understanding the\ud relations of their subjective agency to an objective reality. Traditionally the meaning of\ud such work is propositional. It consists in the truth conditions of bearing witness to the\ud direct experience of the world and the verifiability of what the photography says, or\ud appears to say about it. To understand the meaning of the photography is to know what\ud would make it true or false. This theory has proven useful and durable, although it has not\ud gone unchallenged. The power it has is remarkable and new documentary narratives\ud continue to be formed in this perspective, adapting to changing technologies, and\ud reverberate with us today.\ud A more subtle way of thinking about this is given by a pragmatic theory of meaning. This\ud is what I am proposing. The focus here is upon use and what documentary photography\ud does and says. A praxis that I refer to by the act of photographing: a discourse of\ud locutionary, illocutionary and perlocutionary utterances in whose thoughtful and informed\ud making are unified theories of visual texts within the theories of action and history. The\ud key is the capacity to produce visual narratives made with intention and purpose that in\ud their performative poetics and their semantic innovations attest to the realities of\ud 1 Ricoeur, P. 1991: From Text to Action: Essays in Hermeneutics II. trans. Kathleen Blamey and\ud John B. Thompson. 2nd Edition 2007: with new Forward by Richard Kearney. Evanston.\ud NorthWestern University Press.\ud experience and sedimented historical conditions witnessed, and communicate those to\ud others within a dialectic of historical consciousness and understanding.\ud The narrative visualisations disclose a world, a context in which the drama of our own life\ud and the lives of others makes sense. In their interpretations of an empiric reality can be\ud found ethical concerns and extensions of meaning beyond the original reference that\ud survive the absence of the original subject matter and the original author of the\ud photography whose inferences our imaginations and later acquired knowledge can\ud meditate upon and re-interpret. Thus in the hermeneutic view, the documentary\ud photographic narrative is a form of text that comes to occupy an autonomy from, a) the\ud author’s original intentions, b) the reference of the original photographic context, and\ud c) their reception, assimilation and understanding by unknown readers-viewers.\ud Ricoeur argues that hermeneutic interpretation discloses the reader as ‘a second order\ud reference standing in front of the text’, whose necessary presence solicits a series of\ud multiple and often conflicting readings and interpretations. Consequently Ricoeur’s\ud critical, philosophical hermeneutics brings us from epistemology to a kind of ‘truncated’\ud ontology that is only provisional, a place where interpretation is always something begun\ud but never completed. Interpretation according to Ricoeur engages us within a hermeneutic\ud circle of explanation and understanding whose dialectic is mediated in history and time.\ud For Ricoeur this implies that to be able to interpret meaning and make sense of the world\ud beyond us is to arrive in a conversation that has already begun. His hermeneutic wager is,\ud moreover, that our self-understandings will be enriched by the encounter. In short, the\ud more we understand others and what is meaningful for them the better we will be able to\ud understand ourselves and our sense of inner meaning. The central thesis of his\ud hermeneutics is that interpretation is an ongoing process that is never completed,\ud belonging to meaning in and through distance, that can make actively present to the\ud imagination what is objectively absent and whose discourse is undertood as the act of\ud “someone saying something about something to someone” (Ricoeur 1995: Intellectual\ud Autobiography).2
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Smith, W. Eugene & Smith, Aileen. M 1975: Minamata. Chatto and Windus. London.
    • Ulin, Robert C. 1992: Beyond explanation and understanding: Anthropology and hermeneutics. Dialectical Anthropology: 17/3 p253-269. Springer. Netherlands.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article