Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: Department of Economics, City University of London
Languages: English
Types: Book
Subjects: HD28
This paper develops a detailed partial equilibrium model of the global helium market to study the effects of the recently decided rapid phase out of the U.S. Federal Helium Reserve (FHR), a vast strategic stockpile accumulated during the 1960s. The model incorporates a detailed representation of that industry and treats both helium producers and the FHR as players in a dynamic non-cooperative game. The goal of each player is assumed to be the maximization of discounted profit, subject to technical and resource constraints. We consider two alternative policies aimed at organizing the phase out of the FHR: the currently implemented one and a less stringent one whereby the FHR would be allowed to operate as a profit-maximizing agent during a 20-year extended period. Evidences gained from a series of market simulations indicate that, compared to the current policy, the less stringent policy mandate systematically increases the financial return to the U.S. federal budget, always enhances environmental outcomes as it lowers helium venting into the atmosphere, and also augments global welfare in three out of the four scenarios considered in the paper.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Cai, Z., Clarke, R.H., Glowacki, B.A., Nuttall, W. J., Ward, N. (2010). Ongoing ascent to the helium production plateau-Insights from system dynamics, Resources Policy, 35(2): 77-89.
    • Cottle, R., Pang, J.-S., Stone, R.E. (1992). The Linear Complementarity Problem. Academic Press: Boston.
    • Dasgupta, P., Heal, G. (1979). Economic theory and exhaustible resources. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
    • Dockner, E., Jørgensen, S., Long, N.V., Sorger, G. (2000). Differential games in economics and management science. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
    • Egging, R., Gabriel, S.A., Holz, F., Zhuang, J., (2008). A complementarity model for the European natural gas market. Energy Policy, 36(7): 2385-2414.
    • Epple, D., Lave, L., (1980). Helium: Investments in the Future. The Bell Journal of Economics, 11(2): 617-630.
    • Epple, D., Lave, L. (1982). The Helium Storage Controversy: Modeling Natural Resource Supply. American Scientist, 70(3): 286-293.
    • Fan, L., Hobbs, B.F., Norman, C.S. (2010). Risk aversion and CO2 regulatory uncertainty in power generation investment: Policy and modeling implications. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 60(3): 193-208.
    • Ferris, M.C., Munson, T.S. (2000). Complementarity problems in GAMS and the PATH solver. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 24(2): 165-188.
    • Gabriel, S.A, Kiet, S., Zhuang, J. (2005). A Mixed Complementarity-Based Equilibrium Model of Natural Gas Markets. Operations Research, 53(5): 799-818.
    • Gabriel, S.A., Conejo, A.J., Fuller, J.D., Hobbs, B.F, Ruiz, C. (2012a).Complementarity Modeling in Energy Markets. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science. SpringerVerlag: New York.
    • Gabriel, S.A., Rosendahl, K.E., Egging, R., Avetisyan, H.G., Siddiqui, S. (2012b). Cartelization in gas markets: Studying the potential for a “Gas OPEC.” Energy Economics, 34(1): 137-152.
    • Glowacki, B.A., Nuttall, W.J., Clarke, R.H. (2013). Beyond the helium conundrum. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, 23(3): 0500113.
    • Griffin, J.M., Teece, D.J. (1982). Opec Behaviour and World Oil Prices. Allen & Unwin: London.
    • Haftendorn, C., Holz, F. (2010). Modeling and Analysis of the International Steam Coal Trade. The Energy Journal, 31(4): 205-229.
    • Holz, F., von Hirschhausen, C., Kemfert, C. (2008). A strategic model of European gas supply (GASMOD). Energy Economics, 30(3): 766-788.
    • Hughey, A.M. (1991). Joint Natural Resources and Government Policy: Helium and Natural Gas. Eastern Economic Journal, 17(1): 80-88.
    • Huppmann, D., Holz, F. (2012). Crude oil market power - a shift in recent years? The Energy Journal, 33(4): 1-23.
    • IHS (2014). “Chemical Economics Handbook - Helium”, march 2014.
    • Koopmans, T.C. (1979). Economics among the Sciences. American Economic Review, 69(1): 1-13.
    • Lise, W., Sijm, J., Hobbs, B.F. (2010). The Impact of the EU ETS on Prices, Profits and Emissions in the Power Sector: Simulation Results with the COMPETES EU20 Model. Environmental and Resource Economics, 47(1): 23-44.
    • Liu, B. (1983). Helium conservation and supply and demand projections in the USA. Energy Economics, 5(1): 58-64.
    • Long, N.V. (2011). Dynamic Games in the Economics of Natural Resources: A Survey. Dynamic Games and Applications, 1(1): 115-148.
    • Mathiesen, L., (1985). Computation of economic equilibria by a sequence of linear complementarity problems. Mathematical Programming Study, 23: 144-162.
    • Mohr, S., Ward, J. (2014). Helium Production and Possible Projection. Minerals, 4(1): 130-144.
    • Murphy, F., Pierru, A., Smeers, Y. (2016). A Tutorial on Building Policy Models as MixedComplementarity Problems. Interfaces, Forthcoming. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.2016.0842 Salant, S.W. (1982). Imperfect Competition in the International Energy Market: A Computerized NashCournot Model. Operations Research, 30(2): 252-280.
    • Sears, B. (2012). A history of the helium industry. In Nuttall, W.J., Clarke, R.H., and B.A., Glowacki (Eds), The Future of Helium as a Natural Resource. Routledge: London, UK.
    • Uri, N., D., (1986). The helium market in the USA. Applied Energy, 22(1): 15-30.
    • Uri, N., D., (1987). Helium conservation. Energy Economics, 9(2): 93-98.
    • U.S. Geological Survey (2015). Mineral Commodity Summaries 2015.
    • U.S. Government Accountability Office (2013). Helium Program: Urgent Issues Facing BLM's Storage and Sale of Helium Reserves. Testimony Before the Committee on Natural Resources, House of Representatives, February 14, 2013.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article