LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: University of Kent at Canterbury
Languages: English
Types: Book
Subjects: L
The Share project ran from 2008-2012 and aimed to gain insight into how educators in Higher Education share teaching practice; how they represent it; how they use representations in turn, and how, when and with what evidence they change their teaching practice. The project comprised several separate, although inter-related, investigations and used narrative both as a medium with regard to representing practice and as a methodology in research studies. As Olson observes:\ud … narratives are key components in the authentic study of teaching, for until we understand the context and appreciate the perspectives of those involved, any understanding of what it means to teach and learn will remain fragmented and disconnected from the real world of teaching (Olson, 1997)\ud In investigating teachers’ practice, we undertook four narrative enquiries. In the body of this handbook we consider each, in both theoretical and pragmatic reflection, in the hope that it may be of use to other researchers embarking on this sort of enquiry. We preface this with a short examination of the use of narrative as a medium and follow with the presentation of an analytic framework that emerged from the combination of narrative methodologies we employed.\ud
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Amabile,T., & Kramer, S. (2011). The Progress Principle. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business Review Press.
    • Archibald, J.-A. (2008). Indigenous storywork : educating the heart, mind, body, and spirit.Vancouver: UBC Press.
    • Arminen, I. (2004). Second stories: the salience of interpersonal communication for mutual help in Alcoholics Anonymous. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 319-347.
    • Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature : a necessary unity. London:Wildwood House [etc.].
    • Bruner, J. S. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, Mass. ; London: Harvard University Press.
    • Bytheway, B. (2011). Unmasking age : the significance of age for social research. Bristol: Policy Press.
    • Callahan, S., Rixon, A., & Schenk, M. (2006).The Ultimate Guide to Anecdote Circles [Electronic Version]. Retrieved 13th March 2012, from http://www.anecdote.com.au/files/Ultimate_Guide_to_ACs_v1.0.pdf
    • Falconer, I., Finlay, J., & Fincher, S. (2011). Representing Practice: Practice Models, Patterns, Bundles. Learning Media and Technology, 36(2), 182- 196.
    • Fensham, P. J. (2004). Defining an identity : the evolution of science education as a field of research. Dordrecht ; London: Kluwer Academic.
    • Feynman, R. P., & Robbins, J. (1999). The pleasure of finding things out : the best short works of Richard P. Feynman. Reading, Mass.: Perseus Books.
    • Fincher, S. (2012).The Diarists' Audience. In L. Stanley (Ed.), Documents of Life 2: Revisited: Ashgate Publishing.
    • Fincher, S., Finlay, J., Sharp, H., Falconer, I., & Richards, B. (2012). Change Stories.
    • Fincher, S., Richards, B., Finlay, J., Sharp, H., & Falconer, I. (2012). Stories of Change: How educators change their practice. Paper presented at the Frontiers in Education, Seattle,WA.
    • Fincher, S., & Tenenberg, J. (2007). Warren's Question. Paper presented at the International Computing Education Research.
    • Finlay, J. (2012). Representing Teaching Practice: A Book of Bundles. Canterbury: University of Kent Press.
    • Goodman, A. (2008). Storytelling as Best Practice.
    • Goodson, I., & Walker, R. (1995).Telling Tales. In H. McEwan & K. Egan (Eds.), Narrative in Teaching, Learning and Research. New York:Teachers College Press.
    • Klapproth, D. M. (2004). Narrative as social practice : Anglo-Western and Australian aboriginal oral traditions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    • Klein, G., & Baxter, H. C. (2006). Cognitive Transformation Theory: Contrasting Cognitive and Behavioral Learning. Paper presented at the Cognitive Transformation Theory: Contrasting Cognitive and Behavioral Learning.
    • Kurtz, C. (2010). Working with Stories. Retrieved 17th April 2012, from http://www.workingwithstories.org/
    • Kurtz, C. (2012). Personal communication.
    • Little, J.W. (2007).Teachers' Accounts of Classroom Experience as a Resource for Professional Learning and Instructional Decision Making. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 106(1), 217-240.
    • Macfarlane, A. (2009). Reflections on Cambridge. Delhi: Social Science Press.
    • Mass-Observation, & Harrisson,T. H. (1943). The Pub and the People. A worktown study. [With a preface by T. H. Harrisson.]. London:Victor Gollancz.
    • Mattingly, C. (1991). Narrative reflections on practical actions:Two learning experiments in reflective storytelling. In D. A. Schön (Ed.), The Reflective turn : case studies in and on educational practice. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
    • McDrury, J., & Alterio, M. (2003). Learning through storytelling in higher education : using reflection & experience to improve learning. London: Kogan Page.
    • Mitchell, M. C., & Egudo, M. (2003). A Review of Narrative Methodology. Retrieved. from http://www.dsto.defence.gov.au/corporate/reports/DSTO-GD0385.pdf.
    • Olson, M. (1997). Narrative Epistemology in Practice. Curriculum Inquiry, 27(4).
    • Pahl, K., & Rowsell, J. (2010). Artifactual Literacies: Every object tells a story: Teachers' College Press.
    • Plummer, K. (1994). Telling sexual stories : power, change, and social worlds. London ; New York: Routledge.
    • Plummer, K. (2011). Invited keynote presentation. Paper presented at the Third British Sociological Association Presidential Event: Ken Plummer- Tales of a Critical Humanist.
    • Randall,W. L. (1995). The stories we are : an essay on self-creation.Toronto ; London: University of Toronto Press.
    • Rose, M. (1995). Possible lives : the promise of public education in America. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
    • Roxå,T., & Mårtensson, K. (2009). Significant conversations and significant networks - exploring the backstage of the teaching arena. Studies in Higher Education, 34(5), 547-559.
    • Schön, D. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. London:Temple Smith.
    • Schubert,W. H., & Ayers,W. C. (Eds.). (1992). Teacher Lore: Learning from our own Experience. New York: Longman.
    • Shea, D. C. (2000). The South African Truth Commission : the politics of reconciliation.Washington, DC: Institute of Peace Press.
    • Snowden, D. (2010). Narrative Research.
    • Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology,'translations' and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387-420.
    • Wakeford, J. (2010). Personal communication.
    • White, H. (Ed.). (2012). What do I do Now? Laboratory Tales From Teaching Assistants 2003 - 2011: University of Delaware.
    • White, J. J. (1991).War Stories: Invitations to Reflect on Practice. In B. R. Tabachnick & K. M. Zeichner (Eds.), Issues and practices in inquiryoriented teacher education. London: Falmer.
    • iii For our purposes, we take this early formulation of Bruner's to be the most useful. He later developed and extended his ideas concerning narrative to include considerations of literary theory and structure in his 1991 Critical Inquiry article “The Narrative Construction of Reality” and his 2004 Social Research article “Life as Narrative”.
    • vi Although there was considerable overlap with established academics, see: Liz Stanley, The Archaeology of a 1930s Mass-Observation Project, University of Manchester, Department of Sociology Occasional Paper 27, 1990. Also, it should be noted that many of the MO contributors were drawn from the professional classes. Journalists, politicians and academics are well-represented in MO contributors.
    • vii We would have liked to have chosen the 12th as an historical tip-ofthe-hat to MO, but too few days of the week were represented.With the 15th, every day (Saturday and Sunday as well as the days of the “working” week) was included over the course of the year.
    • xi This protocol was influenced by the approach described in Working Minds: A Practitioner's Guide to Cognitive Task Analysis by Beth Crandall, Gary Klein and Robert R Hoffman, 2006 MIT Press
    • xii The map is itself an example of a long-gestated idea. It was first doodled in 2007 with Jennifer Turns,Yi-Min Huang, Jessica Yellin (all of the University of Washington, Seattle) and Susan Ambrose (of
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article