Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Languages: English
Types: Unknown
NIME research realizes a vision of performance by means of computational expression, linking body and space to sound and imagery through eclectic forms of sensing and interaction. This vision could dramatically impact computer science education, simultaneously modernizing the field and drawing in diverse new participants. We describe our work creating a NIME-inspired computer music toolkit for kids called BlockyTalky; the toolkit enables users to create networks of sensing devices and synthesizers. We offer findings from our research on student learning through programming and performance. We conclude by suggesting a number of future directions for NIME researchers interested in education.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1] ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Task Force on Computing Curricula. 2013. Computer Science Curricula 2013. ACM Press and IEEE Computer Society Press. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2534860
    • [2] John D. Bransford, Ann L. Brown, and Rodney R. Cocking. 1999. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press.
    • [3] Lori Carter. 2006. Why students with an apparent aptitude for computer science don't choose to major in computer science. In Proceedings of the 37th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 27-31. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1121341.1121352
    • [4] Juliet M. Corbin and Anselm Strauss. 1990. Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative sociology 13.1, 3-21.
    • [5] Elise Deitrick, R. Benjamin Shapiro, Matthew P. Ahrens, Rebecca Fiebrink, Paul D. Lehrman, and Saad Farooq. 2015. Using Distributed Cognition Theory to Analyze Collaborative Computer Science Learning. In Proceedings of the eleventh annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 51-60. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2787622.2787715
    • [6] Rebecca Fiebrink. 2011. Real-time human interaction with supervised learning algorithms for music composition and performance. PhD dissertation. Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
    • [7] Jason Freeman, Brian Magerko, Tom McKlin, Mike Reilly, Justin Permar, Cameron Summers, and Eric Fruchter. 2014. Engaging underrepresented groups in high school introductory computing through computational remixing with EarSketch. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 85-90. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2538862.2538906
    • [8] Herbert P. Ginsburg. 1997. Entering the Child's Mind. Cambridge University Press.
    • [9] Google Developers. 2016. Blockly. Retrieved January 29, 2016 from https://developers.google.com/blockly/?hl=en
    • [10] Shuchi Grover, Roy Pea, and Stephen Cooper. 2014. Remedying misperceptions of computer science among middle school students. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 343-348. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2538862.2538934
    • [11] Caitlin Kelleher, Randy Pausch, and Sara Kiesler. 2007. Storytelling alice motivates middle school girls to learn computer programming. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1455-1464. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240844
    • [12] Susan Carol Losh. 2010. Stereotypes about scientists over time among US adults: 1983 and 2001. Public Understanding of Science, 19(3), 372-382.
    • [13] C. Dianne Martin. 2004. Draw a computer scientist. In Working group reports from ITiCSE on Innovation and technology in computer science education (ITiCSE-WGR '04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 11-12. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1044550.1041628
    • [14] Cheryl L. Mason, Jane Butler Kahle, and April L. Gardner. 1991. Draw-a-scientist test: Future implications. School Science and Mathematics 91, no. 5, 193-198.
    • [15] David A. Patterson. 2006. Computer science education in the 21st century. Commun. ACM 49, 3 (March 2006), 27-30. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118212
    • [16] Scratch Statistics. 2016. Retrieved January 29, 2016 from https://scratch.mit.edu/statistics/
    • [17] Ian Simon, Dan Morris, and Sumit Basu. 2008. MySong: automatic accompaniment generation for vocal melodies. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 725-734. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357169
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects

  • NSF | EAGER: BP: WeJam: A Feasibi...

Cite this article