LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
Subjects: RA0421
In recent years traditional approaches to the assessment of health hazards have struggled to connect with the concerns of local communities, resulting in disputes over the interpretation of risk. The Nant-y-Gwyddon (NyG) landfill site in the Rhondda valley, south Wales, was shut down in March 2002 on the recommendations of an independent investigation, following five years of concerted and highly publicised protest action by a group calling itself Rhondda Against Nant-y-Gwyddon Tip (RANT). This local environmental protest provides an interesting case study in the sociology of public health risks and community mobilisation. The research has aimed to explore the key processes and relationships involved in the evaluation of perceived threats to public health in the period up to the closure of the tip in 2002. Rich documentary data formed the primary evidence for the case-study, and this has been used for two main purposes: first, to construct an historical account of the protest focusing specifically on the actions and perspectives of the residents who became local activists and secondly, to explore the positioning of the main actors in relation to some of the key issues and events. This research contributes to theory in several ways. The findings are illustrative of the different kinds of knowledge and expertise brought into play by both residents and statutory bodies, and as such connects with the literature on types of expertise, local knowledge and popular epidemiology. The research also highlights the need to locate such struggles in their broader social and cultural contexts, and suggests the importance of concepts such as dependency, hegemony and counter- hegemony, for understanding lay-expert relationships and protest more broadly. Following this, various examples are also given to suggest the development of several counter-hegemonic features of the residents' campaign, across epistemological, social and political domains.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Macdonald, K. (2001). Using documents, 2nd edn. In N. Gilbert (ed) Researching Social Life. London: Sage, 194-210.
    • Maclure, M. (1993). Mundane Autobiography: some thoughts on self-talk in research contexts. British Journal o f Sociology o f Education, 14 (4), 373-384.
    • McCormick S., Brown P., Zavestoski, S (2003). The Personal Is Scientific, the Scientific Is Political: The Public Paradigm o f the Environmental Breast Cancer Movement, Sociological Forum, 18 (4), 545-576.
    • Melucci, A. (1986). Nomads o f the Present: Social Movements and Individual Needs in Contemporary Society. London: Hutchinson Radius.
    • Melucci, A. (1996.). Challenging Codes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Phillimore, P., Moffat, S., Hudson, E. and Downey, D. (2000). Pollution, Politics and Uncertainty, Environmental Epidemiology in North-East England, In Kroll Smith et al (eds) Illness and the environment: A reader in contested medicine. New York: New York University Press, pp. 384-404.
    • Phillimore, P and Bell, P. (2005). Trust and Risk in a German Chemical Town. Ethnos, 70 (3)311-334 Plummer, K. (2001). Documents o f Life 2; An invitation to a critical humanism. Sage, London.
    • Polletta, F. (1997). Culture and its discontents: recent theorizing on the cultural dimensions of protest, Sociological Inquiry 67 (4), 431-50.
    • Polletta, F. (1998). Contending Stories: Narrative in Social Movements. Qualitative Sociology, 21 (4), 419-446.
    • Popay, J and Williams, G.H. (1996). Public Health Research and Lay Knowledge. Social Science and Medicine, 42 (5) ,759-768.
    • Popay, J. and Williams G.H. (2009). 'Equalizing the people's health: a sociological perspective', in J. Gabe and M. Calnan (Eds.), The New Sociology o f the Health Service. London: Routledge, pp. 222-224 Potter, J. and Wetherell, M. (1994). Analyzing Discourse. In Bryman, A and Burgess, R (eds). Analyzing Qualitative Data. Routledge: London, pp. 47-66.
    • Potts, L. (2004a). An epidemiology o f women's lives: the environmental risk o f breast cancer. Critical Public Health, 14 (2), 133-147.
    • Potts, L. (2004b). Mapping citizen expertise about the environmental risk o f breast cancer. Critical Social Policy, 24 (4), 550-574.
    • Prior, L. (2003). Using Documents in Social Research. Sage: London. Prior, L. (2003). Belief, knowledge and expertise: the emergence of the lay expert in medical sociology. Sociology o f Health and Illness, 25, 41-57.
    • Somers, M. and. Gibson, G, D. (1994). Reclaiming the Epistemological “Other”: Narrative and the Social Constitution o f Identity. In C. Calhoun (ed) Social Theory and the Politics o f Identity. Cambridge: Blackwell, pp. 37-99.
    • Steinberg, M. (1997). 'A Way o f Struggle': Reformations and Affirmations of E.P. Thompson's Class Analysis in the light o f Postmodern Theories o f Language. British Journal o f Sociology, 48 (3), 471-492.
    • Steinberg, M. (1998). Tilting the frame: Considerations on collective action framing from a discursive turn. Theory and society, 27, 845-872.
    • Steinberg, M. (1999). The talk and back talk o f collective action: a dialogic analysis of repertoires of discourse among 19th century English Cotton Spinners. The American Journal o f Sociology, 105 (3), 736-780.
    • Sullivan, M.L. (2002). Exploring Layers: Extended Case Method as a Tool for Multilevel Analysis o f School Violence. Sociological Methods Research, 3 1 ,2 , 255- 285.
    • Thompson, E.P. (1966). The Making o f the English Vintage.
    • Wakefield, S. Elliott,S., Cole D. and Eyles, J. (2005). Taking Environmental Action: The Role of Local Composition, Context, and Collective. Environmental Management, 37 (1), 40-53.
    • Walker G, Simmons P, Irwin A, Wynne B. (1998). Public perception o f risks associated with major accident hazards. Research report series 194/98. Sudbury: HSE Books.
    • Williams, G.H, and Popay, J. (2001) 'Lay health knowledge and the concept of the lifeworld' in: Scambler, G. (ed), Habermas, Critical Theory and Health, London: Routledge Williams, G.H. and Popay, J. (2006) Lay Knowledge and the privilege of experience, 2nd edn. In: D. Kelleher, J. Gabe & G.H. Williams (eds). Challenging Medicine. London, Routledge, pp. 122-145.
    • Wynne, B. (2002). Risk and Environment as Legitimatory Discourses of Technology: Reflexivity Inside Out?, Current Sociology, 50 (3), 459-477.
    • Wynne, B. (2003). Seasick on the Third Wave? Subverting the Hegemony of Propositionalism: Response to Collins and Evans (2002). Social Studies o f Science, 33 (3), 401-417.
    • Yin, R. (1994). Case Study research: design and methods. Sage. London
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article