LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: HD6270, HD60
This study takes a comparative approach to study the ‘outcome’ performance of a WISE and a ‘for-profit’ work-integration organisation that both provided employment enhancement programmes to NEETs. Participants at both organisations completed general self-efficacy questionnaires before and after engagement on the programmes. Additionally, semi-structured interviews and focus groups were held with the owners and staff at both organisations. Results revealed no significant difference between the ‘outcome’ performance of the WISE and for-profit organisation. However, analysis of the organisational aims, values and structures suggests that the ‘added value’ offered by the WISE came from the different induction policy that it operated
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Aiken, M., (2006), Towards Market or State? Tensions and Opportunities in the Evolutionary Path of Three UK Social Enterprises. In (Nyssens, M. ed., (2006), Social Enterprise, Routledge Publishing, Oxon, UK).
    • Ball, S.J., Macrae, S. & Maguire, M., (1999), Young Lives, Diverse Choices and Imagined Futures in an Education and Training Market, International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1999, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp.195-224, Taylor & Francis Ltd., London.
    • Borzaga, C. & Defourny, J. (eds.), (2001), The Emergence of Social Enterprise, Routledge, London.
    • Borzaga, C. & Loss, M., (2006), Profiles & Trajectories of Participants in European WISEs. In Nyssens, ed., Social Enterprise, pp. 169-194, Routledge Publishing, Oxon UK.
    • Campi, S., Defourny, J. & Grégoire, O., (2006), Work-Integration Social Enterprises: Are they Multiple Goal & Multi-Stakeholder Organisations? In (Nyssens, M. ed., 2006, Social Enterprise, pp.
    • 29-49, Routledge Publishing, Oxon, UK).
    • Chen, G., Gully, S.M. & Eden, D., (2001), Validation of a New General Self-Efficacy Scale, Organisational Research Methods, January 2001, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 62-83.
    • Coleman, J.S., (1990), Foundations of Social Theory, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
    • Dart, R., (2004), The Legitimacy of Social Enterprise, Non-Profit Management & Leadership, Vol.
    • 14, No. 4, pp. 411-424, Wiley Periodicals.
    • Denny, S., Hazenberg, R., Irwin, W. & Seddon, F., (2011), Social Enterprise: Evaluation of an enterprise skills programme, Social Enterprise Journal, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 150-172.
    • Eden, D., (2001), Means Efficacy: External Sources of General and Specific Efficacy. In (Erez, M. & Kleinback, U. (eds)., Work Motivation in the Context of a Globalising Economy, pp. 73-85, Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey).
    • Eden, D. & Aviram, A., (1993), Self-Efficacy Training to Speed Reemployment: Helping People to Help Themselves, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 78, No. 3, pp. 352-360, American Psychological Association, Tel Aviv.
    • Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992), Self-Efficacy: A Theoretical Analysis of its Determinants and Malleability, Academy of Management Review, Vol.17 (2), pp. 183-211.
    • Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967), The Discovery of Grounded Theory, Chicago. IL: Aldine.
    • Gui, B., (1991), The Economic Rationale for the Third Sector, Annals of Public & Cooperative Economics, Vol. 62, No. 4, pp. 551-572.
    • Haugh, H. & Kitson, M., (2007), The Third Way & the Third Sector: New Labour's Economic Policy & the Social Economy, Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 31, pp. 973-994, Oxford University Press, Cambridge.
    • Judge, T.A., Locke, E.A. & Durham, C.C, (1997), The Dispositional Causes of Job Satisfaction: A Core Evaluation Approach, Research in Organisational Behaviour, Vol. 19, pp. 151-188.
    • Lincoln, Y. & Guba, E. (1985), Naturalistic Inquiry, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
    • Maykut, P. S. & Morehouse, R. (1994), Beginning qualitative research: A philosophic and practical guide, Falmer Press: London and Washington DC.
    • (2009). A strategic approach to social impact measurement of social enterprises: The SIMPLE methodology, Social Enterprise Journal, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp154-178.
    • Meyers, R. & Houssemand, C. (2010) Socio-professional & Psychological Variables that Predict Job Finding, Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliqué, Vol. 60, pp. 201-219, Elsevier Masson.
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article