Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Nepusz, Tamás; Petróczi, Andrea; Naughton, Declan P (2008)
Publisher: BioMed Central
Journal: BMC Public Health
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: agriculture, RA1-1270, Public aspects of medicine, Technical Advance, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health



Following the World Health Organization Forum in November 2007, the Beijing Declaration recognized the importance of food safety along with the rights of all individuals to a safe and adequate diet. The aim of this study is to retrospectively analyze the patterns in food alert and recall by countries to identify the principal hazard generators and gatekeepers of food safety in the eleven months leading up to the Declaration.


The food recall data set was collected by the Laboratory of the Government Chemist (LGC, UK) over the period from January to November 2007. Statistics were computed with the focus reporting patterns by the 117 countries. The complexity of the recorded interrelations was depicted as a network constructed from structural properties contained in the data. The analysed network properties included degrees, weighted degrees, modularity and k-core decomposition. Network analyses of the reports, based on 'country making report' (detector) and 'country reported on' (transgressor), revealed that the network is organized around a dominant core.


Ten countries were reported for sixty per cent of all faulty products marketed, with the top 5 countries having received between 100 to 281 reports. Further analysis of the dominant core revealed that out of the top five transgressors three made no reports (in the order China > Turkey > Iran). The top ten detectors account for three quarters of reports with three > 300 (Italy: 406, Germany: 340, United Kingdom: 322).


Of the 117 countries studied, the vast majority of food reports are made by 10 countries, with EU countries predominating. The majority of the faulty foodstuffs originate in ten countries with four major producers making no reports. This pattern is very distant from that proposed by the Beijing Declaration which urges all countries to take responsibility for the provision of safe and adequate diets for their nationals.

  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. World Health Organization [http://www.who.int/foodsafety/ fs_management/meetings/forum07/en/index.html]
    • 2. Kok EJ, Keijer J, Meter GA, Kuiper HA: Comparative safety assessment of plant-derived foods. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2008, 50(1):98-113.
    • 3. Hugas M, Tsigarida E, Robinson T, Calistri P: Risk assessment of biological hazards in the European Union. Int J Food Microbiol 2007, 120(1-2):131-135.
    • 4. Sergent T, Ribonnet L, Kolosova A, Garsou S, Schaut A, De Saeger S, Van Peteghem C, Larondelle Y, Pussemier L, Schneider Y-J: Molecular and cellular effects of food contaminants and secondary plant components and their plausible interactions at the intestinal level. Food Chem Toxicol 2008, 46(3):813-841.
    • 5. Birchard K: Europe tackles consumers fears over food safety. Lancet 2001, 357(9264):1274.
    • 6. Millstone E, Lang T, Naska A, Eames M, Barling D, van Zwanenberg P, Trichopoulou A: 'European Policy on Food Safety': Comments and suggestions on the White Paper on Food Safety. Trends Food Sci Tech 2000, 11(12):458-466.
    • 7. Bergeaud-Blackler F, Paola Ferretti M: More politics, stronger consumers? A new division of responsibility for food in the European Union. Appetite 2006, 47(2):134-142.
    • 8. Coppens P, Fernandes da Silva M, Pettman S: European regulations on nutraceuticals, dietary supplements and functional foods: A framework based on safety. Toxicology 2006, 221(1):59-74.
    • 9. Paulsen P, Luf W, Smulders FJM: Different legislations on toxicants in foodstuffs. In Food Toxicants Analysis Edited by: Pico Y. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2007:11-31.
    • 10. Halkier B, Holm L: hifting responsibilities for food safety in Europe: An introduction. Appetite 2006, 47(2):127-33.
    • 11. Marvin HJP, Kleter GA, Prandini A, Dekkers S, Bolton DJ: Early identification systems for emerging foodborne hazards. Food Chem Toxicol 2007 in press.
    • 12. Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed (RASFF) [http:// ec.europa.eu/food/food/rapidalert/index_en.htm]
    • 13. Kleter GA, Prandini A, Filippi L, Marvin HJP: Identification of potentially emerging food safety issues by analysis of reports published by the European Community's Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed (RASFF) during a four-year period. Food Chem Toxicol 2007 in press.
    • 14. R Development Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 2006 [http://www.r-project.org]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria ISBN 3-900051-07-0
    • 15. Csárdi G, Nepusz T: The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal Complex Systems 2006:1695.
    • 16. Newman MEJ: The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review 2003, 45:167-256.
    • 17. Palumbo MC, Farina L, Colosimo A, Tun K, Dhar PK, Giuliani A: Networks everywhere? Some general implications of an emergent metaphor. Current Bioinformatics 2006, 1:219-234.
    • 18. Watts DJ, Strogatz SH: Collective dynamics of "small world" networks. Nature 1998, 393:440-442.
    • 19. Ma'ayan A, Jenkins SL, Goldfarb J, Iyengar R: Network analysis of FDA approved drugs and their targets. Mt Sinai J Med 2007, 74(1):27-32.
    • 20. Nacher JC, Schwartz JM: A global view of drug-therapy interactions. BMC Pharmacol 2008, 8:5.
    • 21. Prolx SR, Promislow DEL, Phillips PC: Network thinking in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 2005, 20(6):345-353.
    • 22. Kleemann R, Verschuren L, van Erk MJ, Nikolsky Y, Cnubben NHP, Verheij ER, Smilde AK, Hendriks HFJ, Zadelaar S, Smith GJ, Kaznacheev V, Nikolskaya T, Melnikov A, Hurt-Camejo E, Greef J van der, van Ommen B, Kooistra T: Atherosclerosis and liver inflammation induced by increased dietary cholesterol intake: a combined transcriptomics and metabolomics analysis. Genome Biol 2007, 8:R200.
    • 23. Newman MEJ: Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 2004, 69(Pt 6 - 2):066133.
    • 24. Latapy M, Pons P: Computing communities in large networks using random walks. J Graph Algorithms Appl 2006, 10(2):191-218.
    • 25. Seidman SB: Network structure and minimum degree. Soc Networks 1983, 5:269-287.
    • 26. Central Intelligence Agency:2008 The World Factbook. ISSN 1553-8133 [https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/theworld-factbook/index.html]
    • 27. Newman MEJ, Girvan M: Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 2004, 69(2 Pt 2):026113.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article