OpenAIRE is about to release its new face with lots of new content and services.
During September, you may notice downtime in services, while some functionalities (e.g. user registration, login, validation, claiming) will be temporarily disabled.
We apologize for the inconvenience, please stay tuned!
For further information please contact helpdesk[at]

fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Mousikou, P; Strycharczuk, Patrycja; Turk, Alice; Rastle, K; Scobbie, James M (2015)
Publisher: University of Glasgow: Glasgow
Languages: English
Types: Article
Converging, albeit inconsistent, empirical evidence\ud suggests that the morphological structure of a word\ud influences its pronunciation. We investigated this\ud issue using Ultrasound Tongue Imaging in the\ud context of an experimental cognitive psychology\ud paradigm. Scottish speakers were trained on\ud apparently homophonous monomorphemic and\ud bimorphemic novel words (e.g. zord, zorred), and\ud tested on speech production tasks. Monomorphemic\ud items were realised acoustically with shorter\ud durations than bimorphemic items; however, this\ud difference was not statistically significant.\ud Progressive coarticulatory effects were also\ud observed in the monomorphemic condition for some\ud speakers. A dynamic analysis of the articulatory data\ud revealed that the observed differences in the\ud pronunciations of the two types of items could be\ud due to factors other than morphological structure.\ud Our results, albeit inconclusive, make a significant\ud contribution to the literature in this research domain\ud insofar as the presence or absence of morphological\ud effects on pronunciation has important implications\ud for extant theories of speech production.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
More information Ok