Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Parker, Gavin; Street, Emma (2015)
Publisher: University of Reading
Languages: English
Types: Book
In considering the position of community engagement within planning in a time of neo-liberalism and a context of ‘neo-communitarian localism’ (cf. Jessop, 2002; DeFilippis, 2004), this paper reviews the role and relevance of Planning Aid in terms of its performance and aspirations in guiding and transforming planning practice (Friedmann, 1973; 1987; 2011) since its inception in 1973. In doing this we reflect on the critiques of Planning Aid performance provided by Allmendinger (2004) and bring the account up-to-date following on from past considerations (e.g. Bidwell and Edgar, 1982; Thomas, 1992; Brownill and Carpenter, 2007a,b; Carpenter and Brownill, 2008) and prompted by the 35 years since the University of Reading produced the first published work reviewing Planning Aid (Curtis and Edwards, 1980). Our paper is timely given renewed attacks on planning, the implementation of a form of localism and reductions in funding for planning in a time of austerity. Our view is that the need for forms of ‘neo-advocacy’ planning and community development are perhaps even more necessary now, given the continuing under-representation of lower income groups, minority groups and to allow for the expression of alternative planning futures. Thus further consideration of how to ensure that Planning Aid functions are sustained and understood requires the attention of policymakers and the planning profession more widely.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Albrechts, L. (2013) 'Reframing strategic spatial planning by using a co-production perspective'. Planning Theory, Vol. 12(1): 46-63.
    • Allmendinger, P. (2004) 'Palliative or cure? Reflections on the practice and future of Planning Aid', Planning Theory and Practice, Vol. 5(2): 269-271.
    • Allmendinger, P. and Haughton, G. (2012) 'Post‐ political spatial planning in England: a crisis of consensus?' Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, NS Vol. 37(1): 89-103.
    • Amos, J. (1971) Presidential address, Journal of the RTPI, Vol. 57(9): 397-399.
    • Bailey, N. (2003) 'Local strategic partnerships in England: the continuing search for collaborative advantage, leadership and strategy in urban governance', Planning Theory and Practice, Vol. 4(4): 443-457.
    • Bailey, N. (2010) 'Understanding Community Empowerment in Urban Regeneration and Planning in England: Putting Policy and Practice in Context', Planning Practice & Research, Vol. 25(3): 317-332.
    • Bidwell, L. and Edgar, W. (1982) 'Promoting Participation in Planning: a case study of Planning Aid in the Dundee area' pp.137-152 in Smith, L. and Jones, E. (eds.) Deprivation, Participation and Community Action, London: Routledge.
    • Brenner, N., Peck, J. and Theodore, N. (2010) 'Variegated neo-liberalism: geographies, modalities, pathways'. Global Networks, Vol. 10(2): 1-41.
    • Brownill, S. (2009) 'The dynamics of participation: modes of governance and increasing participation in Planning', Urban Policy and Research, Vol. 27(4): 357-375.
    • Brownill, S. and Carpenter, J. (2007a) 'New improved participatory planning? The Planning Aid experience', Town and Country Planning, Vol. 76(1): 26-29.
    • Brownill, S. and Carpenter, J. (2007b) 'Increasing participation in planning: emergent experiences of the reformed planning system in England', Planning Practice and Research, Vol. 22(4): 619-634.
    • Brownill, S. and Carpenter, J. (2006) Evaluation of the National Planning Aid Service. RTPI, London.
    • Carpenter, J. and Brownill, S. (2008) 'Approaches to democratic involvement: widening community engagement in the English planning system', Planning Theory and Practice, Vol.
    • Clarke, N. and Cochrane, A. (2013) 'Geographies and politics of localism: the localism of the United Kingdom's coalition government', Political Geography, Vol. 34: 10-23.
    • Cleaver, F. (1999) 'Paradoxes of participation: questioning participatory approaches to development'. Journal of International Development, Vol. 11(4): 597-612 Cooke, B. and Kothari, U. (eds.) (2001) Participation: the new tyranny? Zed books, London.
    • Curtis, B. and Edwards, D. (1980) Planning Aid, Occasional Paper No. 1. November 1980.
    • Davidoff, P. (1965) 'Advocacy and pluralism in planning', Journal of the American Institute of Planners, Vol. 31(4): 331-338.
    • Davoudi, S. and Madanipour, A. (2013) 'Localism and neo-liberal governmentality'. Town Planning Review, Vol. 84(5): 551-562.
    • DCLG [Department for Communities and Local Government] (2011) Plain English Guide to the Localism Act. November 2011. DCLG, London.
    • DeFilippis, J. (2004) Unmaking Goliath: Community Control in the Face of Global Capital.
    • Evans, B. and Gardiner, H. (1985) 'Planning Aid: past and future'. The Planner, Vol. 71(7), July 1985: pp10-13 Fagence, M. (1977) Citizen Participation in Planning. Pergamon, Oxford.
    • Friedmann, J. (2011) Insurgencies: Essays in Planning Theory. Routledge, London.
    • Friedmann, J. (1987) Planning in the public domain: from knowledge to action, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
    • Friedmann, J. (1973) Retracking America: a theory of transactive planning. Anchor, New York.
    • Gaventa, J. (2004) 'Towards participatory governance: assessing the transformative possibilities' pp25-41 in Hickey and Mohan, G. (eds.) Participation: from tyranny to transformation. Zed books, London.
    • Ghose, R. (2005) 'The complexities of citizen participation through collaborative governance'. Space and Polity, Vol. 9(1): 61-75.
    • Gunn, S., Brooks, E., and Vigar, G. (2015) 'The Community's Capacity to Plan: the disproportionate requirements of the new English Neighbourhood Planning initiative' pp147- 167 in Davoudi, S. and Madanipour, A. (eds.) Reconsidering Localism. Routledge.
    • Hall, S. (2011) 'The neo-liberal revolution'. Cultural Studies, Vol. 25(6): 705-728.
    • Harris, M. and Boyle, D. (2009) The Challenge of Co-production. London, New Economics Foundation.
    • Haughton, G. and Allmendinger, P. (2013) 'Spatial planning and the new localism'. Planning Practice and Research, Vol. 28(1): 1-5.
    • Holman, N. and Rydin, Y. (2013) 'What can social capital tell us about planning under localism?' Local Government Studies, Vol. 39(1): 71-88.
    • Lane, M. (2005) 'Public participation in planning: an intellectual history', Australian Geographer, Vol. 36(3): 283-299.
    • Lowndes, V. and Pratchett, L. (2012) 'Local governance under the coalition government: Austerity, localism and the 'Big Society'. Local Government Studies, Vol. 38(1): 21-40.
    • Mazziotti, D. (1974) 'The underlying assumptions of advocacy planning: pluralism and reform', Journal of the American Institute of Planners, Vol. 40(1): 38-47.
    • Mazzucato, M. (2013). The entrepreneurial state: Debunking public vs. private sector myths.
    • Monno, V. and Khakee, A. (2012) 'Tokenism or political activism? Some reflections on participatory planning'. International Planning Studies, Vol. 17(1): 85-101.
    • Mordey, R. (1987) 'Development control, public participation and the need for Planning Aid' pp195-216 in Harrison, M. and Mordey, R. (eds.) Planning Control: philosophies, prospects and practice. London, Croom Helm.
    • Mouffe, C. (1999) 'Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism?', Social Research, Vol.
    • Mouffe, C. (2005) On the Political. Routledge, London.
    • Mouffe, C. (2007) Democracy as agonistic pluralism, pp36-45 in Rewriting democracy: cultural politics in postmodernity, Ermarth, E. (ed.) Ashgate, Aldershot.
    • Newman, J. (2014) 'Landscapes of antagonism: local governance, neo-liberalism and austerity', Urban Studies, Vol. 51(15): 3290-3305.
    • ODPM [Office of the Deputy Prime Minister] (2004) Community involvement in planning.
    • Padley, M. (2013) 'Delivering localism: the critical role of trust and collaboration'. Social Policy and Society, Vol. 12(3): 343-354.
    • Parker, G. (2015) The take-up of Neighbourhood Planning in England 2011-2015. Working Papers in Real Estate & Planning #15/06 pp21. University of Reading, Reading.
    • Parker, G. and Doak J. (2005) 'Networked space? The challenge of meaningful participation and the new spatial planning in England', Planning Practice and Research, Vol. 20 (1): 23- 40.
    • Parker, G., Lynn, T., and Wargent, M. (2015) 'Sticking to the script? The co-production of neighbourhood planning in England'. Town Planning Review, Vol. 86(5): 519-536.
    • Parker, G. and Street, E. (2015b) Supporting community planning in the West Midlands.
    • Report to RTPI/PAE, November 2015. University of Reading.
    • Parker, G., Street, E., Raco, M. and Freire-Trigo, S. (2014) 'In Planning we Trust? Public interest and private delivery in a co-managed planning system'. Town and Country Planning, Vol. 83(12): 537-540.
    • Peel, D. (2013) Planning Aid Northern Ireland: Scoping Study. June 2013. University of Ulster, Belfast.
    • Peters, J. (2012) 'Neoliberal convergence in North America and Western Europe: Fiscal austerity, privatization, and public sector reform'. Review of International Political Economy, Vol. 19(2): 208-235.
    • Raco, M. (2013a) 'The new contractualism, the privatization of the welfare state, and the barriers to open source planning', Planning Practice & Research, Vol. 28(1): 45-64.
    • Raco, M. (2013b) The New Contractual State: Privatisation, Welfare Reform, and the ReMaking of Citizenship. Ashgate, Aldershot.
    • Raco, M., Parker, G., and Doak, J. (2006) 'Reshaping spaces of local governance? Community strategies and the modernisation of local government in England'. Environment and Planning 'C', Vol. 24(4):475-496.
    • Rose, N. (1999) Powers of Freedom. Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
    • RTPI / Planning Aid England (2015) Planning Aid England webpage: http://www.rtpi.org.uk/planning-aid/ [last accessed July 15th 2015] Rydin, Y. (1999) 'Public participation in planning', pp184-197 in Cullingworth, J. (ed.) British Planning: 50 Years of Urban and Regional Policy. Athlone Press, London.
    • Rydin, Y. (2013) Rydin, Y. (2013). The future of planning. Policy Press, Bristol.
    • Shaw, D. and Lord, A. (2009) 'From land-use to 'spatial planning': Reflections on the reform of the English planning system', Town Planning Review, Vol. 80(4-5): 415-436.
    • Swyngedouw, E. (2010) 'Impossible sustainability and the post-political condition, pp85-205 in Making Strategies in Spatial Planning Knowledge and Values' in Cerreta, M., Concilio, G.
    • Thomas, H. (1992) 'Volunteers involvement in planning aid. Evidence from South Wales'.
    • Town Planning Review, Vol. 63(1): 47-62.
    • Watson, V. (2014) 'Co-production and collaboration in planning. The difference.' Planning Theory and Practice, Vol. 15(1): 62-76.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article