LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: Springer Verlag
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
Modelling the temporal response of travellers to transport policy interventions has rapidly emerged as a major issue in many practical transport planning studies and is recognised to hold particular challenges. The importance of congestion and its variation over the day, together with the emergence of time-dependent road user charging as a policy tool, emphasise the need to understand whether and how travellers will change the timing of their journeys. For practical planning studies, analysts face a major issue of relating temporal changes to other behavioural changes that are likely to result from policy or exogenous changes. In particular, the relative sensitivity of time and mode switching has been difficult to resolve. This paper describes a study undertaken to determine the relative sensitivity of mode and time of day choice to changes in travel times and costs and to investigate whether evidence exists of varying magnitudes of unobservable influences in time of day switching. The study draws on data from three related stated preference studies undertaken over the past decade in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands and uses error components logit models to investigate the patterns of substitution between mode and time of day alternatives. It is concluded that the magnitude of unobserved influences on time switching depends significantly on the magnitudes of the time switches considered. With time periods of the magnitude generally represented in practical modelling, i.e. peak periods of 2-3 hours, time switching is generally more sensitive in this data than mode switching. However, the context of the modelling and the extent to which relevant variables can be measured will strongly influence these results.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Abkowitz, M.D. (1981), An analysis of the commuter departure time decision, Transportation 10, 283-297.
    • Arnott, R., de Palma, A., and Lindsey, R. (1990), Departure time and route choice for the morning commute. Transportation Research 24 (3), 209-228.
    • Ashiru, O., Polak, J.W. and Noland, R.B. (2003), The utility of schedules: A model of departure time and activity time allocation with application to individual activity scheduling, Paper presented at the 10th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Lucerne, August 2003.
    • Athanassiou, S. and Polak, J.W. (2001), Generalised extreme value models of time of travel choice, Proceedings of the European Transport Conference, AET, London.
    • Bates, J.J., Shepherd, N.R., Roberts, M., van der Hoorn, A.I.J., and Pol, H.D.P. (1990), A model of departure time choice in the presence of road pricing surcharges. Proceeding of the 18th Summer Annual Meeting, Proceedings of Seminar H, PTRC, London, pp. 215-226.
    • Bates, J.J. and Williams, I.N. (1993), APRIL - A strategic model for road pricing, Proceedings of Seminar D, PTRC Summer Annual Meeting, 1993. PTRC Education and Research Services Ltd, London.
    • Bates, J.J. (1997), Time Period Choice Modelling: a Preliminary Review, HETA Division, Department of Transport, UK.
    • Ben-Akiva, M. and Lerman, S.R. (1985), Discrete Choice Analysis; Theory and Application to Travel Demand, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
    • Bhat, C. (1998a), Analysis of travel mode and departure time choice for urban shopping trips, Transportation Research 32B(6), 361-371.
    • Bhat, C. (1998b), Accommodating flexible substitution patterns in multidimensional choice modelling: formulation and application to travel mode and departure time choice, Transportation Research 32B(7), pp. 425-440.
    • Bhat, C.R., and Steed, J.L., (2002), A continuous-time model of departure time choice for urban shopping trips, Transportation Research 36B(3), pp 207-224.
    • Bradley, M.A., Bowman, J.L., Shiftan, Y., Lawton K., and Ben-Akiva, M.E. (1998), A system of activity-based models for Portland, Oregon. Report prepared for the Federal Highway Administration Travel Model Improvement Program, Washington, DC.
    • Chin, A.T.H. (1990), Influences on commuter trip departure time decisions in Singapore, Transportation Research 24A(5), pp 321-333.
    • Cirillo, C., Daly, A.J., Lindveld, K. (2000) Eliminating bias due to the repeated measurements problem in SP data. In: Ortúzar, J.D. (ed.) Stated Preference Modelling Techniques: PTRC Perspectives 4, PTRC Education and Research Services Ltd..
    • Cosslett, S. (1977), The trip timing decision for travel to work by automobile, in Demand Model Estimation and Validation, The Urban Travel Demand Forecasting Project, McFadden,D.; Talvitie,A.; Cosslett,S.; Hasan,I.; Johnson,M.; Reid,F.; Train,K. (eds), Chapter III-3, pp. 201-221, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
    • Daly, A. and Zachary, S. (1978), Improved multiple choice models, in D. Hensher and M. Dalvi, eds., Identifying and Measuring the Determinants of Mode Choice, Teakfields, London.
    • Daly, A., Gunn, H., Hungerink, G., Kroes, E. and Mijer, P. (1990), Peak-Period Proportions in Large-Scale Modelling, paper presented at the PTRC Summer Annual Meeting.
    • de Palma, A., Khattak, A.J., and Gupta, D. (1997), Commuters' departure time decisions in Brussels. Transportation Research Record, 1607.
    • de Jong, G., Daly, A., Pieters, M., Vellay, C. and Hofman, F. (2003), A model for time of day and mode choice using error components logit, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 39(3), pp. 246-268
    • Hendrickson, C. and Plank, E. (1984), The flexibility of departure times for work trips, Transportation Research 18A(1) pp 25-36.
    • Hess, S., Polak, J.W. and Bierlaire, M. (2005), Functional approximations to alternative-specific constants in time-period choice-modelling, Transportation and Traffic Theory: Flow, Dynamics and Human Interaction, Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, H.S.Mahmassani (ed.), Elsevier, Amsterdam, chapter 28, pp. 545-564.
    • Hyman, G. (1997), The development of operational models for time period choice. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, HETA Division, London.
    • Johnston, R.H., Bates, J.J. and Roberts, M. (1989), A survey of peak spreading in London, Proceedings of the PTRC Summer Annual Meeting.
    • Mahmassani, H.S. and Chang, G.L. (1985), Dynamic aspects of departure time choice behaviour in a commuting system: Theoretical framework and experimental results, Transportation Research Record 1037 88-101.
    • Mahmassani, H.S., Hatcher, S.G., and Caplice, C.G. (1991), Daily variation of trip chaining, scheduling and path selection behaviour of commuters. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of the Association for Travel Behaviour (IATB) Conference, Vol. 2, pp. 29-45.
    • Mannering, F.L., Abu-Eisheh, S.A. and Arnadottir, A.T. (1990), Dynamic traffic equilibrium with discrete/continuous econometric models, Transportation Science 24(2) pp 105-116.
    • McCafferty, D. and Hall, F.L. (1982), `The use of multinomial logit analysis to model the choice of time of travel' Economic Geography 58(3) pp 236-246.
    • McFadden, D. (1974), Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour, in P. Zarembka, ed., Frontiers in Econometrics, Academic Press, New York, pp.105-142.
    • McFadden, D. (1978), Modelling the choice of residential location in A. Karlqvist, L. Lundqvist, F. Snickars and J. Weibull, eds, Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models, NorthHolland, Amsterdam, pp.75-96.
    • McFadden, D. and Train, K. (2000), Mixed MNL models for discrete response, Journal of Applied Econometrics 15 pp 447-4780.
    • Polak, J.W., Jones, P.M., Vythoulkas, P.C., Meland, S. and Tretvik, T. (1991), `The Trondheim Toll Ring: Results of a Stated Preference Study of Travellers' Responses', EURONETT Deliverable 17, Transport Studies Unit, University of Oxford.
    • Polak, J. and Jones, P. (1994), “Travellers' choice of time of travel under road pricing”, paper presented at the 73rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C.
    • RAND Europe (2004), PRISM West Midlands: Time of Day Choice Models. RED-02061-04.
    • Small, K. A. (1982), The scheduling of consumer activities: Work trips, American Economic Review 72(3) pp 467-479.
    • Small, K.A. (1987), A discrete choice model for ordered alternatives”, Econemetrica 55(2), pp 409-24.
    • Train, K. (2003), Discrete choice analysis with simulations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA
    • van Vuren, T., Carmichael, S., Polak, J., Hyman, G., and Cross, S., 1999. Modelling peak spreading in continuous time. Proceedings of the European Transport Conference, AET, London.
    • Vickrey, W.S., 1969. Congestion theory and transport investment. American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings) 59, pp 251-261.
    • Wang, J.J., 1996. Timing utility of daily activities and its impact on travel. Transportation Research 30A(3), pp 189-206.
    • Williams, H. (1977), On the formation of travel demand models and economic evaluation measures of user benefits, Environment and Planning A9, 285-344.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article