LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
Background Rigorous reviews of available information, from a range of resources, is required to support medical and health educators in their decision making related to their educational practice. Aim The aim of the paper is to highlight the importance of a review of theoretical frameworks specifically to supplement reviews that focus on a synthesis of the empirical evidence alone. Establishing a shared understanding of theory as a concept is highlighted as a challenge to these types of review and some practical strategies to achieving this are presented. The paper also introduces the concept of theoretical quality to the methodology of literature reviews, arguing that a critique of how theory is applied should complement the methodological appraisal of the literature in a review. Method We illustrate the challenge of establishing a shared meaning of theory through reference to experiences of an on-going review of this kind conducted in the field of interprofessional education (IPE) and use a high scoring paper selected in this review to illustrate how theoretical quality can be assessed. We focus on theories that apply to IPE curriculum design but the findings are transferable to all reviews of theoretical frameworks. Findings In reaching a shared understanding of theory as a concept, practical strategies that promote experiential and practical ways of knowing (e.g. small group work and piloting of all phases of the review protocol) are required in addition to more propositional ways of sharing knowledge. Concepts of parsimony, testability, operational adequacy and empirical adequacy are explored as concepts that establish theoretical quality. Conclusions Reviews of theoretical frameworks used in medical education are required to inform educational practice. Review teams should make time and effort to reach a shared understanding of the term theory. Theory reviews, and reviews more widely, should add an assessment of theory application to the protocol of their review method. .
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Barr, H 2013, Toward a theoretical framework for interprofessional education., Journal of interprofessional care, 27(1). 4-9.
    • BEME Collaboration. 2012. BEME Coding Sheet - BEME Collaboration. Retrieved 01 July 2015; Available at: www.bemecollaboration.org/downloads/749/beme4_appx1.pdf
    • Bordage, G 2009, Conceptual frameworks to illuminate and magnify., Medical education, 43, (4), 312-9,
    • Carlile, PR 2004, Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries , Organization Science, 15, 5: 555-568.
    • Coles, C & Grant GJ 1985, Curriculum evaluation in medical and health-care education. Medical Education, 19: 405-422.
    • Eraut, M. 2003. The many meanings of theory and practice. Learning in Health and Social Care. 2 (2): 61-65.
    • Fawcett, J. 2005. Criteria for evaluation of theory. Nursing Science Quarterly, 18(2), 131-5.
    • Fawcett, J., & Downs, F. S. 1992. The relationship of Theory and Research (Second Edition). Philadelphia: F.A. Davis.
    • Green, C. 2013 Relative distancing: A grounded theory of how learners negotiate the interprofessional. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 27 (1), 34-42
    • Hean, S., Anderson, E., Bainbridge, L., Clark, P. G., Craddock, D., Doucet, S., Oandasan, I. 2013. IN-2-THEORY--Interprofessional theory, scholarship and collaboration: a community of practice. Journal Of Interprofessional Care, 27(1), 88-90.
    • Hean, S., Craddock, D., Hammick, M., 2012. Theoretical insights into interprofessional education: AMEE Guide No. 62. Medical Teacher, 34(2), e78-101.
    • Hean, S., O'Halloran, C., Craddock, D., Pitt, R., Anderson, L., & Morris, D. 2012. A systematic review of the contribution of theory to the development of effective interprofessional curricula in medical education: Initial Review Protocol. Dundee, Scotland: Proposal to Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) Collaboration. Retrieved 1 July 2015; Available at: www.bemecollaboration.org
    • Hean, S., Hammick, M., Miers, M., Barr, H., Hind, M., Craddock, D., Borthwick, A. and O'Halloran, C. 2009. Evolving theory in interprofessional education. Bournemouth, UK: Bournemouth University.
    • Helme, M., Jones, I., & Colyer, H. 2005. The Theory-Practice Relationship in Interprofessional Education , November. London: HSAP Subject Centre.
    • Heron P and Reason, J. 2008 Extending epistemology within a cooperative inquiry in The SAGE Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, P. Reason, H. Bradbury (Eds) Sage: London
    • Jary D, J., & Jary, J. 1995. Collins dictionary of sociology. Glasgow: Collins.
    • Merton, R.K. 1968 Social theory and Social Structure, New York, Simon and Schuster
    • Pawson, R. and Tilley, N., 1997, Realistic Evaluation, London: Sage.
    • Popper, K 2002, The logic of scientific discovery, New York: Routledge Classics.
    • Reeves, S & Hean, S. 2013, Why we need theory to help us better understand the nature of interprofessional education, practice and care., Journal Of Interprofessional Care, 27(1) 1- 3,
    • Thistlethwaite, J 2012, Interprofessional education: a review of context, learning and the research agenda., Medical Education, 46(1):58-70
    • Walker, L. ., & Avant, K. C. 2005. Strategies for Theory Construction in Nursing (fourth edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
    • Weaver, L, Mcmurtry, A, Conklin, J & Brajtman, S 2011, Harnessing Complexity Science for Interprofessional Education Development : A Case Study, Journal of Research in Interprofessional Practice and education, 2(1) 100-121
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article