LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
Subjects:
Since Bowlby devised his theory of attachment, originally for clinical purposes,\ud refinements and extensions have developed its clinical utility. The research\ud question asked how experienced contemporary clinicians now perceive the role of\ud attachment in the formulation and treatment of distress by reference to their clinical\ud work.\ud Using grounded theory methodology, underpinned by a relativist, moderate social\ud constructionist epistemology, initial sampling consisted of 16 in-depth interviews\ud with experienced clinicians. The tentative theoretical categories that emerged were\ud then developed in theoretical sampling in further interviews with 5 of the initial\ud interviewees. The final theoretical categories to emerge concerned the prevalence\ud of caregiver-related problems, the provision of safety together with the prioritisation\ud of the relationship with self as attachment-related treatment strategies, and\ud attachment theory’s provision of understanding in problem formulation. Whilst this\ud suggests that attachment-related ideas are integrated in contemporary practice, it\ud also suggests that the clinical utility now offered by attachment theory, as\ud established in the literature, has not found broad appeal amongst clinicians despite\ud the commonness of attachment-related presenting problems.\ud The implications of this are manifold. To begin with, attachment theorists have\ud largely failed to bring the potential now offered by attachment-related therapeutic\ud interventions to the market. This situation makes it incumbent on the next\ud generation of attachment researchers to more clearly articulate techniques with\ud which clinicians, of whatever theoretical orientation, can better leverage\ud attachment-related knowledge in their clinical work. In this enterprise, perhaps the\ud knowledge and experience of expert clinicians could be harvested, as this research\ud has done. Moreover, researchers must expand the evidence base that such\ud interventions actually work. Beyond the implications for clinical utility and\ud efficacy, the findings strengthen counselling psychology’s influence on society’s\ud perception and treatment of attachment-related problems.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article