Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Rachel L Williams; Anne E Goodenough; Adam G Hart; Richard Stafford
Publisher: Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Journal: PLoS ONE
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Q, R, Research Article, QH301, QH, Science, Medicine, QL

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: fungi
Within ecology, there are unanswered questions about species-habitat interactions, which could potentially be resolved by a pragmatic analysis of a long-term volunteer-collected dataset. Here, we analysed 18 years of volunteer-collected data from a UK dormouse nestbox monitoring programme to determine the influence of habitat variables on nestbox choice by common dormice ( Muscardinus avellanarius ). We measured a range of habitat variables in a coppiced woodland in Gloucestershire, UK, and analysed these in relation to dormouse nestbox occupancy records (by dormice, other small mammals, and birds) collected by volunteers. While some characteristics of the woodland had changed over 18 years, simple transformation of the data and interpretation of the results indicated that the dataset was informative. Using stepwise regressions, multiple environmental and ecological factors were found to determine nestbox selection. Distance from the edge of the wood was the most influential (this did not change over 18 years), with boxes in the woodland interior being selected preferentially. There was a significant negative relationship with the presence of ferns (indicative of damp shady conditions). The presence of oak (a long-lived species), and the clumped structural complexity of the canopy were also important factors in the final model. There was no evidence of competition between dormice and birds or other mammals. The results provide greater understanding of artificial dormouse nest-site requirements and indicate that, in terms of habitat selection, long-term volunteer-collected datasets contribute usefully to understanding the requirements of species with an important conservation status.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Dos Santos AJN, Broglio SMF, Dias-Pini ND, De Souza LA, Barbosa TJD (2012) Stingless bees damage broccoli inflorescences when collecting fibres for nest building. Sci Agric 69: 281-283. doi:10.1590/ S0103-90162012000400008.
    • 2. Cosarinsky MI, Roces F (2012) The construction of turrets for nest ventilation in the grass-cutting ant Atta vollenweideri: import and assembly of building materials. J Insect Behav 25: 222-241. doi: 10.1007/s10905-011-9290-8.
    • 3. Koops K, McGrew WC, Matsuzawa T, Knapp LA (2012) Terrestrial nest-building by wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Implications for the tree-to-ground sleep transition in early hominins. Am J Pys Anthropol 148: 351-361. doi:10.1002/ajpa.22056. PubMed: 22460549.
    • 4. Kilgas P, Saag P, Magi M, Tilgar V, Mand R (2012) Plumage bacterial load increases during nest-building in a passerine bird. J Ornithol 153: 833-838. doi:10.1007/s10336-011-0801-3.
    • 5. Morris DW (1991) Fitness and patch selection by white-footed mice. Am Nat 138: 702-716. doi:10.1086/285244.
    • 6. Magana M, Alonso JC, Martin CA, Bautista LM, Martin B (2010) Nestsite selection by Great Bustards Otis tarda suggests a trade-off between concealment and visibility. Ibis 152: 77-89. doi:10.1111/j. 1474-919X.2009.00976.x.
    • 7. Cudworth NL, Koprowski JL (2011) Importance of scale in nest-site selection by Arizona gray squirrels. J Wildl Manag 75: 1668-1674. doi: 10.1002/jwmg.194.
    • 8. Goodenough AE, Hart AG, Elliot SL (2008) Variation in offspring quality with cavity orientation in the great tit. Ethol Ecol Evol 20: 375-389. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2008.9522518.
    • 9. Kaneko Y, Newman C, Buesching CD, Macdonald DW (2010) Variations in badger (Meles meles) sett microclimate: Differential cub survival between main and subsidiary setts, with implications for artificial sett construction. Int J Ecol: 2010: Article ID 859586
    • 10. Kuroe M, Ohori S, Takatsuki, Miyashita T (2007) Nest-site selection by the harvest mouse Micromys minutus in seasonally changing environments. Acta Theriol 52: 355-360. doi:10.1007/BF03194233.
    • 11. Solomon NG, Christiansen AM, Lin YK, Hayes LD (2005) Factors affecting nest location of prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster). J Mammol 86: 555-560. doi: 10.1644/1545-1542(2005)86[555:FANLOP]2.0.CO;2.
    • 12. Bright PW, Morris PA (1990) Habitat requirements of dormice Muscardinus avellanarius in relation to woodland management in Southwest England. Biol Conserv 54: 307-326. doi: 10.1016/0006-3207(90)90143-D.
    • 13. Lutermann H, Verburgt L, Rendigs A (2010) Resting and nesting in a small mammal: sleeping sites as a limiting resource for female grey mouse lemurs. Anim Behav 79: 1211-1219. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav. 2010.02.017.
    • 14. Carey AB, Wilson TM, Maguire CC, Biswell BL (1997) Dens of northern flying squirrels in the Pacific Northwest. J Wildl Manage 61: 684-699. doi:10.2307/3802176.
    • 15. Smith GC, Mathieson M, Hogan L (2007) Home range and habitat use of a low-density population of greater gliders, Petauroides volans (Pseudocheiridae: Marsupialia), in a hollow-limiting environment. Wildl Res 34: 427-483.
    • 16. Wolton R (2009) Hazel dormouse Muscardinus avellanarius (L.) nestsite selection in hedgerows. Mammalia 73: 7-12.
    • 17. Bright PW, Mitchell P, Morris PA (1994) Dormouse distribution: survey techniques, insular ecology and selection of sites for conservation. J Appl Ecol 31: 329-339. doi:10.2307/2404547.
    • 18. Harris S, Yalden DW (2004) An integrated monitoring programme for terrestrial mammals in Britain. Mamm Rev 34: 157-167. doi:10.1046/j. 0305-1838.2003.00030.x.
    • 19. Bright PW, Morris PA (1992) Ranging and nesting behaviour of the dormouse, Muscardinus avellanarius, in coppice-with-standards woodland. J Zool 226: 589-600. doi:10.1111/j. 1469-7998.1992.tb07502.x.
    • 20. Bright PW, Morris PA (1991) Ranging and nesting behaviour of the dormouse, Muscardinus avellanarius, in diverse low-growing woodland. J Zool 224: 177-190. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1991.tb04797.x.
    • 21. Juškaitis R (2000) Abundance dynamics of common dormouse (Muscardinus avellanarius), fat dormouse (Glis glis) and yellow-necked mouse (Apodemus flavicollis) derived from nestbox occupation. Folia Theriol Est 5: 42-50.
    • 22. Juškaitis R (1997) Use of nestboxes by the common dormouse (Muscardinus avellanarius) in Lithuania. Nat Croat 6: 177-188.
    • 23. Minot EO, Perrins CM (1986) Interspecific interference competition-nest sites for blue and great tits. J Anim Ecol 55: 331-350. doi: 10.2307/4712.
    • 24. Morris PA, Bright PW, Woods D (1990) Use of nestboxes by the Dormouse Muscardinus avellanarius. Biol Conserv 51: 1-13. doi: 10.1016/0006-3207(90)90027-M.
    • 25. Brewer C (2002) Outreach and partnership programs for conservation education where endangered species conservation and research occur. Conserv Biol 16: 4-6. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01613.x.
    • 26. Evans C, Abrams E, Reitsma R, Roux K, Salmonses L, Marra PP (2005) The neighbourhood nestwatch program: participant outcomes of a citizen science ecological research project. Conserv Biol 19: 589-594. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00s01.x.
    • 27. Newman C, Buesching CD, MacDonald DW (2003) Validating mammal monitoring methods and assessing the performance of volunteers in wildlife conservation Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodies?. Biol Cons 113: 189-197.
    • 28. McCaffrey RE (2005) Using citizen science in urban bird studies. Urban Habitats 3: 70-86.
    • 29. Irwin A (1995) Citizen science: a study of people, expertise, and sustainable development. London: Routledge.
    • 30. Bracewell M (2009) Nest material preferences in the common dormouse, Muscardinus avellanarius, in the Southern United Kingdom, MSc. Habitat Creation and Management. Staffordshire University.
    • 31. PTES and Natural England (2012) National Dormouse Monitoring Programme: Survey guidelines and recording forms 2012. Available: www.ptes.org/index.php?page=186.
    • 32. Sarà M, Falletta W, Milazzo A (2003) The effect of exposure and height of nest-boxes on grid colonization by the common dormouse (Muscardinus avellanarius). Acta Zool Hung 49 (Suppl. 1).
    • 33. England Natural (2008) Licensing application forms. Available: http:// www.naturalengland.org.uk/ourwork/regulation/wildlife/licences/ applicationforms.aspx#dormice. Accessed: 14th December 2012.
    • 34. Goodenough AE, Goodenough AS (2012) Development of a rapid and precise method of digital image analysis to quantify canopy density and structural complexity. ISRN Ecol Article ID:: 619842.
    • 35. Fowler J, Cohen L, Jarvis P (1998) Practical statistics for field biology (2nd ed). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
    • 36. Goodenough AE, Elliot SL, Hart AG (2009) Are nest-sites actively chosen? Testing a common assumption for three non-resource limited birds. Acta Oecol 35: 598-602. doi:10.1016/j.actao.2009.05.003.
    • 37. Thode HC Jr (2002) Testing for Normality. New York: Marcel Dekker.
    • 38. Higby LK, Stafford R, Bertulli CG (2012) An evaluation of ad-hoc presence only data in explaining patterns of distribution: cetacean sightings from whale-watching vessels. International J Zool Article ID:: 428752.
    • 39. Batáry P, Báldi A (2004) Conservation focus evidence of an edge effect on avian nest success. Conserv Biol 18: 389-400. doi:10.1111/j. 1523-1739.2004.00184.x.
    • 40. Andren H (1992) Corvid density and nest predation in relation to forest fragmentation: A landscape perspective. Ecol 73: 794-804. doi: 10.2307/1940158.
    • 41. Paton PWC (1994) The effect of edge on avian nest success - How strong is the evidence? Conserv Biol 8: 17-26. doi:10.1046/j. 1523-1739.1994.08010017.x.
    • 42. Juškaitis R (2003) Abundance dynamics and reproductive success in the hazel dormouse Muscardinus avellanarius, in Lithuania. Folia Zool 52: 239-248.
    • 43. Chanin P, Woods M (2003) Surveying dormice using nest tubes: results and experiences from the South West Dormouse Project. English Nature Research Report 524. Peterborough: English Nature.
    • 44. Juškaitis R, Remeisis R (2007) Summer nest-sites of the common dormouse Muscardinus avellanarius in young woodlands of Lithuania. Pol J Ecol 55: 795-803.
    • 45. Richards CGL, White AC, Hurrell F, Price FFF (1984) The food of the common dormouse (Muscardinus avellanarius) in South Devon. Mamm Rev 14: 19-28. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2907.1984.tb00335.x.
    • 46. Juškaitis R (2007) Feeding by the common dormouse (Muscardinus avellanarius): A review. Acta Zool Lit 17: 151-159. doi: 10.1080/13921657.2007.10512827.
    • 47. Page CN (1997) The ferns of Britain and Ireland: second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • 48. Eden S (2009) Living with dormice. Winterbourne: Papadakis.
    • 49. Marsh ACW, Morris PA (2000) The use of dormouse Muscardinus avellanarius nest boxes by two species of Apodemus in Britain. Acta Theriol 45: 443-453.
    • 50. Devictor V, Whittaker RJ, Beltrame C (2010) Beyond scarcity: citizen science programmes as useful tools for conservation biogeography. Divers Distrib 16: 354-362. doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2009.00615.x.
    • 51. PTES (2012) Dormouse monitoring. Available: http://www.ptes.org/ dormousemonitoring/?redir=dormousemonitoring. Accessed: 8th August 2012.
    • 52. Miller JR (2005) Biodiversity conservation and the extinction of experience. Trends Ecol Evol 20: 430-434. doi:10.1016/j.tree. 2005.05.013. PubMed: 16701413.
    • 53. Goswami A (2007) Chaining biodiversity and neologism livability. Resour Energ Dev 4: 89-96.
    • 54. Crick HQP, Baillie SR, Leech D (2003) The UK Nest Record Scheme: its value for science and conservation. Bird Study 50: 254-270. doi: 10.1080/00063650309461318.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.