Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Eihab Abdelghaffar Elsharkawy, Heba
Languages: English
Types: Unknown
With increasing concern over national green house gas (GHG) emissions, combined with the widespread economic impact of global commodities such as coal, natural gas and oil and their effect on energy prices, improving household energy efficiency can be seen as a key vehicle against which both energy emissions can be reduced and domestic GHG emissions curtailed. It is argued that factors that form the basis of choices, habits and values of individuals dictate an individual's decision to either adopt environmentally sustainable behaviour or not. This research reflects on how this specific area of energy policy is being enacted through policy and regulation, notably through one of the Community Energy Saving Programme (CESP) schemes, rolled out by the UK government in 2009.\ud Although Government can play a pivotal role helping people foster more sustainable behaviour, it must do so in a manner that engages individuals and the public at large. As such, the aim is to adopt a more long term outlook towards encouraging sustainable energy use. The research reflects therefore on the results of a two-phase survey questionnaire administered to the residents of a CESP scheme in Aspley, Nottingham. The questionnaire sought to identify how tenants of energy-inefficient homes tend to behave with respect to domestic energy consumption and how their dwellings performed. This was augmented by quantitative data comprising utility bill figures gathered from the homes under investigation.\ud This study adopts a mixed method strategy where the researcher combines both quantitative and qualitative data in order to provide comprehensive analysis of the research problem. In this research, 'before-and-after design' survey design is set up to explore the associations between variables under study. The field work survey was performed in one of the pilot CESP schemes currently under delivery in the Aspley area of Nottingham. Designed and executed in two survey phases, the first phase sought to understand residents' attitudes and behaviour and explore how this related to home energy use and performance prior to extensive energy-related upgrades to their dwellings. The second survey phase sought to examine changes - if any - in users' energy consumption behaviour and dwelling performance after their homes were upgraded to higher energy efficiency standards. This second phase also explored the possible reasons for any behavioural change depicted; whether it was due to policy uptake, information provided or means of communicating energy saving advice.\ud The Aspley area in Nottingham is identified as one of the most deprived areas in Nottingham, besides the number of inefficient solid wall houses that are 'hard to heat'. Thus, assessing the effectiveness of policy interventions requires a clear understanding of consumer behaviour and motivations across all income groups so that the most appropriate approaches are developed. As such, it is possible that government aspirations to reduce energy consumption will go unheeded if they are inconsistent with the social and physical context of real life. Financial costs, past behaviour, social values and physical infrastructure are considered some of the most difficult barriers to changing energy behaviours. Policies need not only inform people about technological improvements that can be installed in their homes, but should also strongly encourage and incentivise them to use them efficiently. The users' energy consumption behaviour and the policy interventions will make the difference between promising policy, and policy which in fact delivers on its aims for energy efficiency and sustainability.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • P.ag, Y. & Darby, S., 2009. Consumer-supplier-govemment triangular relations: Rethinking the UK policy path for carbon emissions reduction from the UK residential sector. EnelflY PoIky, 37, pp.3964-92.
    • Petl, J. & GuertIer, P., 2004. User behaviour in enetgy efficient homes. Lonon: Association for the Conservation of Energy.
    • Schulz, P.W., Nolan, J.M., CiaIdini, R.B..G.N.J. & Griskevikius, V., 2007. The constructive, destructive and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Saence, 18(5), pp.429-34.
    • SOC, S.D.C., 2006. Stock Take: Delivering improvements in existing houses. London: SustailI8bIe Development Commission.
    • Seddon, C. & 8eaLmont, J., 2011. Social TI8IJds 41. Office for National Statistics (ONS).
    • Stem, P.C., 2002. Changing behavior In households and communities: what have we learned? In DietZ, T. & Stem, P.C. New Tools for Environmental Protection: Education, Infonnation, and VoIcRaIy MNsans. W88hingeon DC: National Academy Press. pp.201-11.
    • Stem, P.C., Beny, LG. & Hirst, E., 1985. Residential Conservation Incentives. EnelflY Policy, pp.133-42.
    • Stem, P.C. at aI., 1997. Consumption as a Problem for Environmental Science. In Stem, P.C. et 81. EnvitonmenIaIy SiglJilfcant Consumption. Washington: National Academy Press. pp.1-12.
    • SustailI8bIe Development Commission, 2005. Sustainable Buildings- The Challenge of the Existing Stock A Technical ~ Paper. London: SOC.
    • Utley, J.I. & Shorroc:k, L, 2008. Domestic enetgy fact file 2008. London: Crown copyrights BRE.
    • 1.Abrahamse, W., Ste.. L, Vlek, c., & Rothengatter, T.
    • (2007). The effect of tailored information, goal settin..
    • and tailored feedback on household energy use, energyrelated behaviors, and behavioral antecedents. Journal of Envlronm~ntal Psychology, 27 (4) , 26S-276.
    • 2.Beerepoot, M. (2007). EI\erIY policy instruments and technical change in the residential building sector.
    • 3.CLG. (2007). Building a G~r Future: policy stat~~nt. London: the stationery office.
    • 4.CLG. (2008). ~nltion ofZero Carbon H~s and Non Domestic Buildings: Consultation. London: Crown copyright.
    • S.ClG. (2009). Sustainablr New Homrs- The Road to Zero Carbon. lOndon: Communities and Local Government.
    • 6.CLG. (2007). The future of the CCXW for SUstainable Homes: Malelng a roting mondatory. London: DCLG.
    • 7.DCLG. (2010). Code for SUstainable H~s: June quarter. london: Crown copyright.
    • 8.DCLG. (2008). Cost onalysls of the Code for SUstainable H~s: Final report. London.
    • 9.DCLG. (2007). The Calkurt review of housebuilding drlivrry. london: HMSO.
    • 10. OEFRA. (2005). The Govem~nt's Standard Assessment Procedure for Energy Rating 01 ~lIings.
    • 11. OEFRA, o. o. (2005). ~curlng the Future: UK Govrmment sustaInable tkve~nt strat~. london: The Stationary Office.
    • 12. Department of Communities and Local Governement, D. (2010). Code lor SUstainable Homes: June quarter.
    • 13. OTt, O. o. (2007). Muting th~ EMrgy Cholle~: A White Po~r on Energy May 2007. Norwich: The Secretary Office.
    • 14. Gardner, G. T., & Stem, P. C. (1996). Environm~ntal Problems and Humon khovlour. Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon.
    • lS. Gyber& P., & Palm, J. (2009). Influenclnl households' energy behaviour-how is this done and on what premises? En~yPolicy37, 2807-2813.
    • 16. Jackson, T. (2005). Motivating Sustainable Consumption: a review 01 evidence on consumer behaviour and behavioural change. Centre for Environmental Strategy. Surrey: University of Surrey.
    • 17. Jackson, T., & Michaelis, L. (2003). Policies/or Sustainable Consumption. london: Sustainable Development Commission.
    • 18. Keirstead, J. (2007). Behavioural responses to photovoltalc systems in the UK domestic sector. Energy Policy (3S), 4128-414l.
    • 19. Unden, A.-L., Carlsson-Kanyamab, A., & Eriksson, B.
    • (2006). Efficient and inefficient aspects of residential energy behaviour:What are the policy instruments for change? Energy Policy, (34)1918-1927.
    • 20. McManus, A., Gaterell, M., & Coates, L. (2010). The potential of the Code for Sustainable Homes to deliver genuine 'sustainableenergy' in the UK social housing sector. Energy Policy .
    • 21. Nickerson, R. S. (2003). Psychology and Environmental Change. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
    • 22. Osbaldiston, R., & Sheldon, K. M. (2003). Promoting internalizedmotivation for environmentally responsible behavior: A prospective study of environmental goals.
    • Joumal 0/ Environmental Psychology, 349-357.
    • 23. Osmani, M., & O'Reilly, A. (2009). Feasibility of zero carbon homes In England by 2016: A house builder's perspective. Building and Envlronm~nt, 44,1917-1924.
    • 24. Partnerships, L. E., & Renewables, L. (2006). Towards Zero Carbon Developments: SUpportivr Information for Boroughs. london: London Energy Partnerships.
    • 2S. Pett, J., & Guertler, P. (2004). U~r behovlour in energy efficient homes. Lonon: Association for the Conservation of Energy.
    • 26. SOC, S. o. (2006). Stocle Talee: Delivrring improvements in ~xisting houses. London: Sustainable Development Commission.
    • 27. Smith, E. M. (2009, May 12). Jevons Paradox - CoolOil-Conservation. Retrieved November 7, 2010, from Musings from the Chiefio: Techno bits and mind pleasers: http://chiefio.wardpress.com/2009/0S/12/jevonsparadox-coal-oil-conservation/
    • 28. Sorreil, S. (2009). JellOn'5 Paradox revisited: The evidence for backfire from improved energy efficiency.
    • Energy Policy, 37, 1456-1469.
    • 29. Stern, P. C., Berry, L. G., & Hirst, E. (l98S). Residential Conservation Incentives. Energy Policy, 133-142.
    • 30. UNEP. (2007). Buildings and aimate Change, Status, Chollenges and Opportunities. Paris: United Nations Environment Programme.
    • 31. Utley, J. I., & Sharrock, L. (2008). Domestic en~rgy fact file 2008. BRE. London: Crown coPyrllhts.
    • 32. ZeroCarbonHub. (2009). Defining Zero Carbon Homes: Hove your soy. london: Zero Carbon Hub.
    • [1] N. Eyre, B. Flanagan and K. Double, 'Engaging People in Saving Energy on a Large Scale: Lessons from Programmes of the Energy Saving Trust in the UK " in Engaging the Public with Climate Change: Behaviour Change and Communication (London: Earthscan, 2011), pp. 141-60.
    • [2] T Jackson, 'Motivating Sustainable Consumption:a review of evidence on consumer behaviour and behavioural change', Sustainable Development Research Network (Guildford, 2005).
    • [3] H. Elsharkawy, P. Rutherford and R. Wilson, 'Tageting people's behaviour for effective policy delivery: Community Energy Saving Programme (CESP) in Aspley, Nottingham', in lAPS 22 Human Experience in the Natural and Built Environment: Implications for Research, Policy, and Practice, ed.
    • by O. Romice, E. Edgerton and K. Thwaites (Glasgow: Patron Karen Anderson, Architecture Design Scotland, 2012), p. 174.
    • [4] W. Abrahamse, L. Steg, Ch. Vlek, Rothengatter, 'A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation', JoumaJ ofEnironmental Psychology, 25 (2005), 273-91.
    • [5] DECC, 'Warm Homes, Greener Homes: Astrategy for Household Energy Management' , Department of Energy and Climate Change (London, 2010).
    • [6] (Kurtz et al., 2005)
    • [7] D. McKenzie-Mohr, Fostering Sustainable Behavior: An Introduction to Community-Based Social Marketing, 3rd edn (Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers, 2011)..
    • [8] R.B. Cialdini, 'Influencing Change: Applying behavioral science research insights to reframe environmental policy and program', in Behavior, Energy and Climate Change 2010 (Sacramento: [n.puh.],201O).
    • [9] L. Whitmarsh, 'Behavioural responses to climate change: Asymmetry of intentions and impacts', JoumaJ ofEnvironmental Psychology, 2009,13-23.
    • [10] SOC, 'Stock Take: Delivering improvements in existing houses', Sustainable Development Commission (London, 2006).
    • [11] Y. Parag and S. Darby, 'Consumer-supplier-government triangular relations: Rethinking the UK policy path for carbon emissions reduction from the UK residential sector', Energy Policy, 37 (2009), 3984-92.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article