LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: P1
The present study investigates the effects of Processing Instruction on two different age groups and the role that cognitive task demands might play in the results generated by Processing Instruction. This study includes school-age children and adult native speakers of German learning English as a foreign language – a language combination not previously investigated within the Processing Instruction and individual differences research paradigm. The present study investigates directly whether two different age groups will benefit equally from Processing Instruction in altering their reliance on lexical temporal indicators and redirecting their attention to verb forms on Processing Instruction activities with different cognitive demands. The grammatical feature chosen for this study is the English past simple tense marking tested on both interpretation and production measures. The results from this study provide further evidence that the Processing Instruction is an effective instructional treatment in helping school-age children and adult L2 learners to make accurate form-meaning connections. The results from the first sentence-level interpretation task and the production task showed that Processing Instruction has positive and equal effects on both age groups (school-age learners and adults). The positive effects of instruction were maintained over the delayed post-test for both age groups who made similar gains on the immediate post-test. The results from the second (cognitively more complex) sentence-level interpretation task indicated that the adults made greater gains than school-age learners. However, both groups retained the positive effects of instruction over time. The difference in gains between the two age groups on the second sentence-level interpretation task can be explained in terms of cognitive processing load.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Benati, Alessandro. 2005. The eefcts of processing instruction, traditional instruction and meaning-output instruction on the acquisition of the English past simple tense. Language Teaching Research 9. 67-93.
    • Benati, Alessandro. 2013. Age and the eefcts of processing instruction on the acquisition of English passive constructions among school children and adult native speakers of Turkish. In James Lee & Aleassandro Benati (ed.), Individual Diferences and Processing Instruction, 83-104. Shefield, UK: Equinox.
    • Benati, Alessandro & James Lee. 2008. Grammar Acquisition and Processing Instruction: Secondary and Cumulative Efects. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
    • Benati Alessandro, James Lee & Scott Houghton. 2008. From Processing Instruction on the acquisition of English past tense to secondary transfer-of-training eefcts on English third person singular present tense. In Alessandro Benati & James Lee (Ed.), Grammar Acquisition and Processing instruction: Secondary and Cumulative Efects, 88-120. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
    • Bialystok, Elaine. 1997. The structure of age: in search of barriers to second language acquisition. Second Language Research 13. 116-137.
    • Birdsong, David. 2006. Age and second language acquisition and processing: A selective overview. Language Learning 56. 9-49.
    • Doughty, Catherine. 2004. Eefcts of instruction on learning a second language: A critique of instructed SLA research. In: Bill VanPatten, Jessica Williams & Susanne Rott (ed.), Form-Meaning Connections in Second Language Acquisition, 189-212. Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    • Foster, Pauline & Peter Skehan. 1996. The influence of planning time on performance in task-based learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18. 299-234.
    • Kuiken, Folkert & Ineke Vedder. 2008. Cognitive task complexity and written output in Italian and French as a foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing 17. 48-60.
    • Lee, James & Alessandro Benati. 2007. Delivering Processing Instruction in Classrooms and Virtual Contexts: Research and practice. London: Equinox.
    • Lee, James & Alessandro Benati. 2009. Research and Perspectives on Processing Instruction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    • Lee, James & Alessandro Benati. 2013. Individual Diferences and Processing Instruction. London: Equinox Publishing.
    • Lee, James & Bill VanPatten. 1995. Making Communicative Language Teaching Happen. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    • MacWhinney, Brian. 1997. Second language acquisition and the Competition Model. In A. M. de Groot & Judith Kroll (ed.), Tutorials in Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives, 113-142. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
    • Mavratoni, Maria & Alessandro Benati. 2013. The eefcts of processing instruction and traditional instruction on two diefrent school-age learners: the case of English present simple tense third person singular. In James Lee & Alessandro Benati (ed.), Individual Diferences and Processing Instruction, 185-228. London: Equinox Publishing.
    • Muñoz, Carmen. 2006. The eefcts of age on foreign language learning: The BAF Project. In Carmen Muñoz (ed.), Age and the rate of foreign language learning, 1-40. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    • Nuevo, Anna Maria. 2006. Task Complexity and Interaction: L2 Learning Opportunities and Development. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Washington, DC: Georgetown University.
    • Ojima, Mika. 2006. Concept mapping as pre-task planning: A case study of three Japanese ESL writers. System 34. 566-585.
    • Ong, Justina & Jun Zhang. 2010. Eefcts of task complexity on the fluency and lexical complexity in EFL students' argumentative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 19. 218-233.
    • Révész, Andrea, Rebecca Sachs & Mika Hama. 2014. The Eefcts of Task Complexity and Input Frequency on the Acquisition of the Past Counterfactual Construction Through Recasts. Language Learning 64. 615-650.
    • Robinson, Peter. 2001. Task complexity, task dificulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22, 27-57.
    • Robinson, Peter & Roger Gilabert. 2007. Task complexity, the cognitive hypothesis and second language learning and performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 45. 161-176.
    • Robinson, Peter. 2011. Second language task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In Peter Robinson (Ed.), Second Language Task Complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of Language Learning and Performance, (Chapter 1, pp. 3-38). Amsterdam/Philadelphia PA: John Benjamins.
    • Schmid, Monika. 2012. The impact of age and exposure on forgetting and retention of the birth language in international adoptees: a perspective from Holocaust survivors. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 2. 177-208.
    • Skehan, Peter. 1998. A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University.
    • Skehan Peter. 2009. Modelling Second Language Performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30. 510-532.
    • Skehan, Peter & Pauline Foster. 2001. Cognition and tasks. In Peter Robinson (ed.), Cognition and second language instruction, 183-205. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.
    • VanPatten, Bill. 1990. Attending to form and content in the input: An experiment in consciousness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 12. 287-301.
    • VanPatten, Bill. 1996. Input Processing and Grammar Instruction in Second Language Acquisition. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Pub.
    • VanPatten, Bill. 2004. Processing Instruction: Theory, Research, and Commentary. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    • VanPatten, Bill. 2007. Input processing in adult second language acquisition. In Bill VanPatten, & Jessica Williams (ed.), Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction, 115-135. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • VanPatten Bill & Cristina Sanz. 1995. From input to output: Processing instruction and communicative tasks. In Fred Eckman, Dianne Highland, Peter Lee, Jean Mileham & RitaWeber (eds.), Second Language Acquisition: Theory and Pedagogy, 168-185. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article