LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
Subjects: RT
The introduction of the Framework and Higher Award (ENB 1991b)\ud provides the opportunity for nurses to claim credits for the\ud knowledge they use in practice. The assumption is, that this\ud is accreditable (ENB 1991). This study aims to identify if\ud this is the case by examining the practical knowledge of 35\ud expert nurses. Expert nurses were chosen as they are the most\ud likely of all nurses to be using knowledge in their practice\ud which is accreditable at diploma and degree levels.\ud The study was carried out in two Health Authorities, using both\ud quantitative and qualitative methods. The later formed the main\ud contribution to the study. Ethnographic and phenomenological\ud approaches were used to guide the workshops, interviews,\ud observation visits and critical incident collection. Modified\ud grounded theory was used for data analysis. As a result of the\ud inductive nature of the study, emphasis changed from\ud identifying knowledge for accreditation purposes, to exploring\ud the types of knowledge and expertise that emerged from the\ud data.\ud Findings challenge much that had been written about nursing\ud knowledge. A number of issues arise. Questions are raised about\ud the definitive way that expertise is presented in the\ud literature. Also, the assumption that the importation of\ud subject matter knowledge will produce practitioners who provide\ud expert care is challenged. Whilst education is seen as\ud important, it is not sufficient. Other factors in the nurses'\ud 'world view' require consideration. The experts exhibited four\ud different 'world views'. These in turn had an evolutionary\ud effect on knowledge development and knowledge use. Four\ud distinct types of expertise were found to have developed.\ud A number of areas are explored in relation to the practical\ud knowledge experts use and include: organisational culture,\ud doctor-nurse, and management-nurse relationships, academic and\ud professional development, empowerment and reflective ability.\ud Issues relating to advocacy, the theory-practice gap,\ud accreditation, and the quality of patient care, are also\ud examined. Implications arise for curriculum builders, managers,\ud nurses and educationalists.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Carper's Patterns of knowing (Carper 1978) 3. The two educations as curricular models (Jarvis 1986)
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article