Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
MacFarlane, A.; Al-Wabil, A.; Marshall, C. R.; Albrair, A.; Jones, S. A.; Zaphiris, P. (2010)
Publisher: Emerald
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Z665
Purpose – The purpose of the paper is to resolve a gap in our knowledge of how people with dyslexia interact with Information Retrieval (IR) systems, specifically an understanding of their information searching behaviour. Very little research has been undertaken with this particular user group, and given the size of the group (an estimated 10% of the population) this lack of knowledge needs to be addressed.\ud \ud Design/Methodology/Approach - We use elements of the dyslexia cognitive profile to design a logging system recording the difference between two sets of participants: dyslexic and control users. We use a standard Okapi interface together with two standard TREC topics in order to record the information searching behaviour of these users. We gather evidence from various sources, including quantitative information on search logs, together with qualitative information from interviews and questionnaires. We record variables on queries, documents, relevance assessments and sessions in the search logs. We use this evidence to examine the difference in searching between the two sets of users, in order to understand the effect of dyslexia on the information searching behaviour. A topic analysis is also conducted on the quantitative data to show any effect on the results from the information need.\ud \ud Research limitations/implications – As this is a pilot study, only 10 participants were recruited for the study, 5 for each user group. Due to ethical issues, the number of topics per search was restricted to one topic only. The study shows that the methodology applied is useful for distinguishing between the two user groups, taking into account differences between topic. We outline further research on the back of this pilot study in four main areas. A different approach from the proposed methodology is needed to measure the effect on query variables, which takes account of topic variation. More details on users are needed such as reading abilities, speed of language processing and working memory to distinguish the user groups. Effect of topic on search interaction must be measured in order to record the potential impact on the dyslexic user group. Work is needed on relevance assessment and effect on precision and recall for users who may not read many documents.\ud \ud Findings – Using the log data, we establish the differences in information searching behaviour of control and dyslexic users i.e. in the way the two groups interact with Okapi, and that qualitative information collected (such as experience etc) may not be able to account for these differences. Evidence from query variables was unable to distinguish between groups, but differences on topic for the same variables were recorded. Users who view more documents tended to judge more documents as being relevant, either in terms of the user group or topic. Session data indicated that there may be an important difference between the number of iterations used in a search between the user groups, as there may be little effect from the topic on this variable.\ud \ud Originality/Value – This is the first study of the effect of dyslexia on information search behaviour, and provides some evidence to take the field forward.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Alty, J.L., (2002). Dual Coding Theory and education: some media experiments to examine the effects of different media on learning. In Proceedings of Ed-MEDIA: Denver, Collorado, USA, 42-47.
    • Al-Wabil, A., Zaphiris, P., Wilson, S. (2008). Examining visual attention of dyslexics on web navigation structures with eye tracking. In proceedings of Innovations in Information Technology Conference, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates, December 2008. IEEE, 717-721.
    • Al-Wabil, A. (2009). The Effect of Dyslexia on Web Navigation. PhD Thesis, April, City University London.
    • Beaulieu, M. (1997). Experiments on interfaces to support query expansion. Journal of Documentation, 53 (1), 8-19.
    • British Dyslexia Association (2009). Adult dyslexia checklist.
    • (Available on: http://www.labda.org.uk/adults.htm - visited 29th June 2009).
    • DRC: Disability Rights Commission (2004). The Web: Access and Inclusion for Disabled people.
    • (Available on: - visited 22nd June 2009).
    • Gregor, P., Dickinson, A., Maccaffer, A. and Andreason, P. (2003). SeeWord - a personal word processing environment for dyslexic computer users. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34 (3)., 341-355.
    • Jansen, B.J. Spink, A. Bateman, J, and Saracevic, T. (1998) Real life information retrieval: a study of user queries on the web, SIGIR Forum, 32 (1), 5-17.
    • Kurniawan, S., and Conroy, G. (2006). Comparing Comprehension speed and accuracy of online information in students with and without Dyslexia. Kurniwan, S. and Zaphiris, P. (eds). Advances in Universal Web Design and Evaluation: Research, Trends and Opportunities, Idea Group publishing, 257-270.
    • Ling, J., van Schaik, P. (2006). The influence of font type and line length on visual search and information retrieval in web pages. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64, 395- 404.
    • MacFarlane, A., Petrie, H. and Jones, S. (2005). A user study on the effect of Dyslexia on Information Retrieval, to be presented at User Studies workshop, In: A. Bailey, I. Ruthven and L.
    • Azzopardi (eds), Proceedings of COLIS 2005 Workshop on Evaluating User Studies in Information Access, 31-38.
    • Morgan, E. and Klein, C. (2000). The Dyslexic Adult in a non-dyslexic world, Whurr Publishers.
    • Silverstein, C., Henzinger, M., Marais and Moricz M. (1999) Analysis of a Very large Web Search Engine Query log., SIGIR Forum, 33 (1), 6-12.
    • Sitbon, L. Bellot, P., Blache, P. (2007). Phonetic based sentence level rewriting of questions typed by dyslexic spellers in an information retrieval context. In: Proceedings of Interspeech 2007 - Eurospeech, Antwerp, Belgium.
    • Sackville, A., Blankfield, S. and Davey, J. (2002) Supporting Students with Dyslexia in the Effective Use of C&IT in Their Academic Studies SEDA National Staff Development Conference, November, Birmingham, UK.
    • Snowling, M.J. (2000). Dyslexia, 2nd Edition. Blackwell Publishing.
    • Spink, A., Ozmutlu, S, Ozmutlu, H and Jansen, B. (2002). U.S. versus European web searching trends. SIGIR Forum, 36 (2), 32-38.
    • Vakkari, P., Jones, S., MacFarlane A, and Sormunen E. (2004). Query exhaustivity and Relevance Feedback, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 60 (2), 109-127.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article