Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Schot, Johan; Kanger, Laur (2018)
Publisher: Elsevier
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: HM, H, HB
Industrial society has not only led to high levels of wealth and welfare in the Western world, but also to increasing global ecological degradation and social inequality. The socio-technical systems that underlay contemporary societies have substantially contributed to these outcomes. This paper proposes that these socio-technical systems are an expression of a limited number of meta-rules that, for the past 250 years, have driven innovation and hence system evolution in a particular direction, thereby constituting the First Deep Transition. Meeting the cumulative social and ecological consequences of the overall direction of the First Deep Transition would require a radical change, not only in socio-technical systems but also in the meta-rules driving their evolution – the Second Deep Transition. This paper develops a new theoretical framework that aims to explain the emergence, acceleration, stabilization and directionality of Deep Transitions. It does so through the synthesis of two literatures that have attempted to explain large-scale and long-term socio-technical change: the Multi-level Perspective (MLP) on socio-technical transitions, and Techno-economic Paradigm (TEP) framework.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Acemoglu, D., and Robinson, J. A. 2012. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. London: Profile Books.
    • Araujo, L., and Harrison, D. 2002. Path Dependence, Agency and Technological Evolution. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 14(1): 5-19.
    • Arthur, W. B. 1989. Competing technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events. The Economic Journal 99(394): 116-131.
    • Arthur, W. B. 2009. The Nature of Technology: What It Is and How It Evolves. New York: Free Press.
    • Autor, D. H., and Dorn, D. 2013. The Growth of Low-Skill Jobs and the Polarization of the US Labor Market. American Economic Review 103(5): 1553-1597.
    • Baker, L., Newell, P., and Phillips, J. 2014. The Political Economy of Energy Transitions: The Case of South Africa. New Political Economy 19(6): 791-818.
    • Bardi, U. 2011. The Limits to Growth Revisited. New York: Springer.
    • Beck, U. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
    • Beniger, J. R. 1986. The Control Revolution: Technological and Economic Origins of the Information Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    • Bernard, L., Gevorkyan, A. V., Palley, T. I., and Semmler, W. 2014. Time scales and mechanisms of economic cycles: a review of theories of long waves. Review of Keynesian Economics 2(1): 87-107.
    • Brousseau, E., Garrouste, P., and Raynaud, E. 2011. Institutional changes: Alternative theories and consequences for institutional design. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 79(1-2): 3-19.
    • Castells, M. 2000-2004. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, 3 volumes, Second edition. Oxford, UK, and Malden, MA: Oxford University Press.
    • Christian, D. 2004. Maps of Time: An Introduction to Big History. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
    • Coenen, L., Benneworth, P., and Truffer, B. 2012. Toward a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions. Research Policy 41(6): 968-979.
    • Constant II, E. W. 1980. The Origins of the Turbojet Revolution. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    • Hughes, T. P. 1983. Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880-1930. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2014. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Available online: http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/syr/SYR_AR5_FINAL_full_wcover.pdf.
    • Jessop, B. 1992. Fordism and Post-Fordism: a Critical Reformulation. In Pathways to Regionalism and Industrial Development, eds. A. J. Scott, M. J. Storper. London: Routledge, 43-65.
    • Kaiser, W. and Schot, J. 2014.Writing the rules for Europe. Cartels, experts and international Organizations. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
    • Kanger, L., and Schot, J. 2016. User-made Immobilities: A Transitions Perspective (forthcoming).
    • Kaplinsky, R. 2011. Schumacher meets Schumpeter: Appropriate technology below the radar. Research Policy 40(2): 193-203.
    • Kingston, C., and Caballero, G. 2009. Comparing theories of institutional change. Journal of Institutional Economics 5(2): 151-180.
    • Köhler, J. 2012. A comparison of the neo-Schumpeterian theory of Kondratiev waves and the multi-level perspective on transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 3: 1-15.
    • Konrad, K., Truffer, B., and Voß, J.-P. 2008. Multi-regime dynamics in the analysis of sectoral transformation potential: evidence from German utility sectors. Journal of Cleaner Production 16(11): 1190-1202.
    • Korotayev, A., and Tsirel, S. 2010. A Spectral Analysis of World GDP Dynamics: Kondratieff Waves, Kuznets Swings, Juglar and Kitchin Cycles in Global Economic Development, and the 2008-2009 Economic Crisis. Structure and Dynamics 4(1): 1-55.
    • Korotayev, A., Zinkina, J., and Bogevolnov, J. 2011. Kondratieff waves in global invention activity (1900-2008). Technological Forecasting and Social Change 78(7): 1280-1284.
    • Kristal, T. 2013. The Capitalist Machine: Computerization, Workers' Power, and the Decline in Labor 's Share within U.S. Industries. American Sociological Review 78(3): 361-389.
    • Lachman, D. A. 2013. A survey and review of approaches to study transitions. Energy Policy 58: 269-276.
    • Lamba, H. S. 2010. Understanding the ideological roots of our global crises: A pre-requisite for radical change. Futures 42(10): 1079-1087.
    • Lévi-Strauss, C. 1963. Structural Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.
    • Manning, P. 2013. Big Data in History. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
    • Markard, J., and Truffer, B. 2008. Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework. Research Policy 37(4): 596-615.
    • Mathews, J. A. 2011. Naturalizing capitalism: The next Great Transformation. Futures 43(8): 868-879.
    • Mathews, J. A. 2013. The renewable energies technology surge: A new techno-economic paradigm in the making? Futures 46: 10-22.
    • Mathews, J. A. 2014. Greening of Capitalism: How Asia Is Driving the Next Great Transformation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    • Mathews, J. A., and Tan, H. 2015. China's Renewable Energy Revolution. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
    • Mazzucato, M., and Perez, C. 2014. Innovation as Growth Policy: the Challenge for Europe. SPRU Working Paper Series, 2014-13. Available online: https://www.sussex.ac.uk/webteam/gateway/file.php?name=2014-13-swpsmazzucato-perez.pdf&site=25.
    • Metz, R. 2011. Do Kondratieff waves exist? How time series techniques can help to solve the problem. Cliometrica 5(3): 205-238.
    • McClellan III, J. E., and Dorn, H. 2015. Science and Technology in World History: An Introduction, 3rd edition. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    • McDowall, W. 2014. Exploring possible pathways to hydrogen energy: A hybrid approach using socio-technical scenarios and energy system modelling. Futures 63: 1-14.
    • McNeill, J. R., and McNeill, W. H. 2003. The Human Web: A Bird's-Eye View of World History. New York: W. W. Norton.
    • McShane, C. 1994. Down the Asphalt Path: The Automobile and the American City. New York: Columbia University Press.
    • Meadowcroft, J. 2005. Environmental Political Economy, Technological Transitions and the State. New Political Economy 10(4): 479-498.
    • Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., and Behrens, W. W. 1972. The Limits to Growth: A Report for Club of Rome's Project on the Predicament of Mankind. New York: Universe Books.
    • Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., and Meadows, D. L. 2004. Limits to Growth: The 30-Year Update. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.
    • Mesoudi, A. 2011. Cultural Evolution: How Darwinian Theory Can Explain Human Culture and Synthesize the Social Sciences. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
    • Mildner, S.-A., Lauster, G., and Wodni, W. 2011. Scarcity and Abundance Revisited: A Literature Review of Natural Resources and Conflict. International Journal of Conflict and Violence 5(1): 155-172.
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article