LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: SAGE Publications (UK and US)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: HD
Radical change can be conceived in terms of the reconceiving of ontological distinctions, such as those separating humans from animals. In building on insights from French pragmatism, we suggest that, while no doubt very difficult, radical change can potentially be achieved by creating “alignment” between multiple “economies of worth” or “common worlds” (e.g., the market world of money, the industrial world of efficiency). Using recent campaigns by animal rights organizations as our case, we show how the design of “tests” (e.g., tests of profitability, tests of efficiency) can help align multiple common worlds in support for radical change. Our analysis contributes to the broader management and organization studies literatures by conceiving radical change in terms of changing ontological categorizations (e.g., human/animals vs. sentient/ non-sentient), and by proposing that radical social change agents can be helpfully conceived as opportunistically using events to cumulatively justify the change they desire overtime.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Adams, C. J. 1990. The sexual politics of meat: A feminist-vegetarian critical theory. New York: Continuum.
    • ALF (Animal Liberation Front). (2014). Manifesto. Retrieved from: http://www.animalliberationfront.com/ALFront/Manifesto-TotalLib.htm
    • Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. (2007). Constructing mystery: Empirical matters in theory development. Academy Management Review, 32(4), 1265-1281.
    • Ansari, S. & Reinecke, J. (2015). Taming wicked problems: The role of framing in the construction of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management Studies. doi: 10.1111/joms.12137.
    • Banerjee, S. B. (2003). Who sustains whose development? Sustainable development and the reinvention of nature. Organization Studies, 24(1): 143-180.
    • Basil, M. D. (1996) Identification as a mediator of celebrity effects. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 40(4), 478-495.
    • Benford, R. D. & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26: 611-639.
    • Benson, J. K. (1977). Organizations: A dialectical view. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22: 1-21.
    • Bindel, J. (2010). Let's make PETA history. The Guardian (28 October). Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2010/oct/28/peta-women-meat
    • Blokker, P. (2011). Pragmatic sociology: Theoretical evolvement and empirical application. European Journal of Social Theory, 14(3), 251-261.
    • Blowfield, M. (2005). Corporate social responsibility - The failing discipline and why it matters for international relations. International Relations, 19(2), 173-191.
    • Boltanski, L. (2011[2009]). On critique: A sociology of emancipation. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
    • Boltanski, L. (2012[1990]). Love and justice as competences. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
    • Boltanski, L. (2013[2004]). The foetal condition: A sociology of engendering and abortion. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
    • Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (2005[1999]). The new spirit of capitalism. London, UK: Verso.
    • Boltanski, L., Darré, Y., & Schiltz M.-A. (1984). La dénonciation. Actes de la Recherche and Sciences Sociales, 51(1), 1-40.
    • Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (1999). The sociology of critical capacity. European Journal of Social Theory, 2(3), 359-377.
    • Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (2006[1991]). On justification: Economies of Worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    • Bourdieu, P. (1984[1979]). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    • Bourdieu, P. (1998). On television. New York, NY: The New Press.
    • Boxenbaum, E. (2014). Toward a situated stance in organizational institutionalism: Contributions from French pragmatist sociology theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, 23(3): 319-323.
    • Brandle, J., Daudigeos, T., Edwards, T., & Pernkopf-Konhäuser, K. (2014). Why French Pragmatism matters to organizational institutionalism. Journal of Management Inquiry, 23(3), 314-318.
    • Bullinger, B. (2014). Family affairs: Drawing on family logic and familiar regime of engagement to contrast “close-up” views of individuals in conventionalist and institutitonalist reasoning. Journal of Management Inquiry, 23(3), 328-332.
    • Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.). Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196-223). London, UK: Routledge.
    • Callon, M., & Latour, B. (1981). Unscrewing the big leviathan: How actors macro-structure reality and how sociologists help them to do so. In K. Knorr & A. Cicourel (Eds.). Advances in social theory and methodology (pp.277-303). Boston, MA: Routledge.
    • Churchill, W. (1931). Fifty years hence. Strand Magazine, 82, 549-558. Retrieved from: http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/fifty-years-hence/
    • Cloutier, C., & Langley, A. (2013). The logic of institutional logics: Insights from French pragmatist sociology. Journal of Management Inquiry, 22(4), 360-380.
    • Cowspiracy. (2014). Cowspiracy. Retrieved from: http://cowspiracy.com/
    • Cumpsty, J. S. (1991) Religion as belonging: A general theory of religion. Lanham, Maryland: University Press of America.
    • Dansou, K. & Langley, A. (2012). Institutional work and the notion of test. M@n@gement, 15(5): 502-527.
    • Davis, D. B. (1987). Reflections on abolitionism and ideological hegemony. The American Historical Review, 92(4), 797-812.
    • Déjean, F., Gond J.-P. & Leca, B. (2004). Measuring the unmeasured: an institutional entrepreneur strategy in an emerging industry. Human Relations, 57(6), 741-764.
    • Descola, P. (2013a [2005]). Beyond nature and culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    • Descola, P. (2013b). The ecology of others. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    • Diaz-Bone, R. (2009). Convention, organization and institution. The contribution of the “economics of convention” to institutionalism. Historical Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 34, 235-264.
    • Diaz-Bone, R. (2014). Methodological positionings and perspectives: Comparing economies of convention with the institutional logics approach. Journal of Management Inquiry, 23(3), 324-327.
    • Dodier, N. (1993). Review article: Action as a combination of “common worlds.” Sociological Review, 41, 556-571.
    • Driessen, C. (2012). Pig towers and in vitro meat: Disclosing moral worlds by design. Social Studies of Science, 42(6): 797-820.
    • Eckstein, H. (1975). Case study and theory in political science. In F. I. Greenstein & N. W. Polsby (Eds). Strategies of inquiry (pp. 79-137). Reading, UK: Addison-Wesley.
    • Engber, D. (2008). The bogus $1 million meat prize. Slate.com (23 April). Retrieved from: http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2008/04/the_bogus_1_million_ meat_prize.html.
    • Eshel, G. & Martin, P. A. (2006). Diet, energy and global warming. Earth Interactions, 10(9), 1-17.
    • Fairlie, S. (2008) A load of hot air? The Guardian (Society Liftout). (30 January), p. 8.
    • Flyverbom, M. (2011). The power of networks: Organizing the global politics of the Internet. Cheltnham, UK: Edward Elgar.
    • Fraser, B. P., & Brown, W. J. (2002). Media, celebrities, and social influence: Identification with Elvis Presley. Mass Communication and Society, 1(2), 183-207.
    • Gerber, P.J., Steinfeld, H., Henderson, B., Mottet, A., Opio, C., Dijkman, J., Falcucci, A., & Tempio, G. (2013). Tackling climate change through livestock - A global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
    • Gond, J.-P., Leca, B., & Cloutier, C. (2015a). An 'Economies of Worth' perspective on strategy as practice: Justification, valuation and critique in the practice of strategy. In D. Golsorkhi, L. Rouleau, D. Seidl & E. Vaara (Eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice (2nd ed.), pp. 200-219.
    • Gond, J.-P., Barin-Cruz, L., Raufflet, E., & Charron, M. (2015b). To frack or not to frack? The interaction of justification and power in a sustainability controversy. Journal of Management. doi: 10.111/joms.12166.
    • Gore, A. (2011). Climate of denial: Can science and truth withstand the merchants of poison? Rolling Stone (21 June). Retrieved from: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/climate-of-denial-20110622
    • Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C. R. (1996). Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1022-1054.
    • Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R., & Hinings, C. R. (2002). Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 58-80.
    • Gross, R. E. (2015). Evolution is finally winning over Creationism. Slate (November 19). Retrieved from: http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2015/11/polls_americans_believ e_in_evolution_less_in_creationism.html
    • Guggenheim, M., & Potthast, J. (2012). Symmetrical twins: On the relationship between Actor-Netowrk Theory and the sociology of critical capacities. European Journal of Social Theory, 15(2): 157-178.
    • Gullace, N. F. (2014). Christabel Pankhurst and the Smethwick election: Right-wing feminism, the Great War and the ideology of consumption. Women's History Review, 23(3), 330-346.
    • Habermas, J. (1990). Moral consciousness and communicative action. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
    • Hache, E., & Latour, B. (2010). Morality or moralism? An exercise in sensitization. Common Knowledge, 16(2), 311-330.
    • Hoffman, A. J., & Ocasio, W. (2001). Not all events are attended equally: Toward a middlerange theory of industry attention to external events. Organization Science, 12(4), 414- 434.
    • Horne, P. (2009). The Godfather: 'Nobody enjoyed one day of it'. The Telegraph (September 22). Retrieved from: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/starsandstories/6189162/The-Godfather-Nobodyenjoyed-one-day-of-it.html
    • Jagd, S. (2011). Pragmatic sociology and competing orders of worth in organizations. European Journal of Social Theory, 14(3): 343-359.
    • Jha, A. (2013a). First lab-grown hamburger gets full marks for 'mouth feel'. The Guardian (August 5). Retrieved from: http://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/aug/05/world-firstsynthetic-hamburger-mouth-feel
    • Kamzi, B. A., Leca, B. & Naccache, P. 2015. Is corporate social responsibility a new spirit of capitalism? Organization, doi: 10.1177/1350508415619239.
    • Miller, J. D., Scott, E. C., & Okamoto, S. (2006). Public acceptance of evolution. Science, 313, 765-766.
    • Moore, H. (2014). 'Environmentalists' called out in Cowspiracy. PETA Blog (June 16). Retrieved from: http://www.peta.org/blog/environmentalists-caught-in-cowspiracy/
    • Naess, A. (1989). Ecology, community and lifestyle. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    • Newkirk, I. (2013). Why lab-grown meat is the future of food. Huffington Post (August 1). Retrieved from: http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/ingrid-newkirk/artificial-meat-labgrown_b_3688992.html
    • Nickel, J. W. (2007). Making sense of human rights (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
    • Oldenhof, L., Postma, J., & Putters, K. (2013). On justification work: How compromising enables public managers to deal with conflicting values. Public Administration Review, 74(1), 52-63.
    • Papon, A.-M. (2012). PETA's porn charade: To return to tried-and-true misogyny and sizeism? Adios Barbie (August 16). Retrieved from: http://www.adiosbarbie.com/2012/08/PETAs-porn-charade-to-return-to-tried-and-truemisogyny-sizeism/
    • Patriotta, G., Gond J.-P., & Schultz, F. (2011). Maintaining legitimacy: Controversies, orders of worth, and public justifications. Journal of Management Studies, 48(8), 1804-1836.
    • PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals). 2014b. Meat and the environment. Retrieved from: http://www.PETA.org/issues/animals-used-for-food/meat-environment/
    • Prasad, P., Prasad, A., & Baker, K. (2014). Smoke and mirrors: Institutional entrepreneurship and gender identities in the US Tobacco Industry, 1920-1945. Organization, Epub ahead of print 7 September 2014. DOI: 10.1177/1350508414547148
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article