LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
Aim To draw on the authors’ experience of using storyboards in focus groups conducted with vulnerable young women. Background Creative methods are increasingly used in qualitative research as a means of generating richer data and of promoting more meaningful participation. This paper presents an argument for using storyboards in focus group discussions and draws on real life research with young women by way of illustration. Review Methods This is a methodology paper Discussion This paper discussed the authors’ experiences of using storyboards in participatory research. This approach has a number of advantages such as promoting participation and engagement, empowering participants and, enabling them to take more control over the research process. The theoretical and philosophical position of the authors is outlined – namely a feminist approach to research. The data collection method is then described in detail outlining each stage of the process step by step. Conclusion Using creative techniques within more traditional qualitative approaches may lead to further in-depth data as well as increased participation. Such approaches could be of value in nursing research in which patients, clients and service user perspectives are often vitally important.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Abell J, Myers G (2008) Analysing Research Interviews. In Wodak R, Krzyanowski, M (Eds) Qualitative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 1-24.
    • Blaikie N (2007) Approaches to social enquiry. 2nd Ed. Polity, Cambridge.
    • Bowling A (2002) Research Methods in Health: Investigating health and health services. 2nd Ed. Open University Press, Buckingham.
    • Carter S, Henderson, L. (2006) Approaches to qualitative data collection in social science. In Bowling A, Ebrahim S (Eds) Handbook of Health Research Methods: Investigation, Measurement and Analysis. Open University Press, Berkshire, 215-229.
    • Denscombe M (2007) The Good Research Guide. 3rd Ed. Open University Press, Berkshire.
    • Phoenix A (2010) Suppressing intertextual understandings. In Ryan-Flood R, Gill R (Eds) Secrecy and Silence in the Research Process: Feminist Reflections. Routledge, London, 161- 176.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article