LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Journal: Journal of the Operational Research Society
Types: Article
Subjects:
The development of strategy remains a debate for academics and a concern for practitioners. Published research has focused on producing models for strategy development and on studying how strategy is developed in organisations. The Operational Research literature has highlighted the importance of considering complexity within strategic decision making; but little has been done to link strategy development with complexity theories, despite organisations and organisational environments becoming increasingly more complex. We review the dominant streams of strategy development and complexity theories. Our theoretical investigation results in the first conceptual framework which links an established Strategic Operational Research model, the Strategy Development Process model, with complexity via Complex Adaptive Systems theory. We present preliminary findings from the use of this conceptual framework applied to a longitudinal, in-depth case study, to demonstrate the advantages of using this integrated conceptual model. Our research shows that the conceptual model proposed provides rich data and allows for a more holistic examination of the strategy development process. © 2012 Operational Research Society Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Beer, S. (1984) The Viable System Model: Its Provenance, Development, Methodology and Pathology. Journal of the Operational Research Society 35 (1):7-25.
    • Bennet, A. and Bennet, D. (2004) Organizational Survival in the New World. Burlington, USA: Elsevier: Butterworth-Heinemann. 0750677120.
    • Boulding, K.E. (1956) General Systems Theory: The Skeleton of Science. Management Science 2 (3):197-208.
    • Bryson, J.M., Crosby, B.C. and Bryson, J.K. (2009) Understanding Strategic Planning and the Formulation and the Implementation of Strategic Plans as a Way of Knowing: The Contributions of Actor-Network Theory. International Public Management Journal 12 (2):172-207.
    • Buckley, W. (1968) Society as a Complex Adaptive System. Buckley, W., (Ed.) first edn, 490-513. Chicago, USA: Aldine Publishing Company.
    • Burrell, G. and Morgan, G. (1979) Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis: elements of the sociology of corporate life. first edn, Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing Ltd. 1-85742-114-0.
    • Buttriss, G.J. and Wilkinson, I.F. (2006) Using Narrative Sequence Methods to Advance International Entrepreneurship Theory. Journal of International Entrepreneurship 4 157-174.
    • Caldart, A.A. and Ricart, J.E. (2004) Corporate Strategy Revisited: A View from Complexity Theory. European Management Review 1, 96-104.
    • Camillus, J.C. (2008) Strategy as a Wicked Problem. Harvard Business Review 86 (5):98-114.
    • Chaffee, E.E. (1985) Three Models of Strategy. Academy of Management Review 10 (1):89-98.
    • Checkland, P. and Poulter, J. (2006) Learning for Action:A Short Definitive Account of Soft Systems Methodology and its use for Practitioners, Teachers and Students. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 978-0-470- 02554-3.
    • Checkland, P. and Scholes, J. (1990) Soft Systems Methodology in Action: Includes a 30 Year Retrospective. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & SonsLtd.
    • Checkland, P. (1999) Systems Thinking, Systems Practice: Includes a 30 Year Retrospective. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
    • Cilliers, P. (1998) Complexity and Postmodernism: Understanding Complex Systems. London, UK: Routledge. 0- 415-15287-9.
    • Dyson, R.G. (2000) Strategy, performance and operational research. Journal of the Operational Research Society 51 (1):5-11.
    • Dyson, R.G. (2004) Strategic Management and SWOT Analysis at the University of Warwick. European Journal of Operational Research 152 (4):631-640.
    • Dyson, R.G., Bryant, J., Morecroft, J. and O'Brien, F. (2007) The Strategic Development Process. In: O'Brien, F. and Dyson, R.G., (Eds.) Supporting Strategy: Frameworks, Methods and Models, first edn. pp. 3-24. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.]
    • Dyson, R.G. and Foster, M.J. (1980) Effectiveness in Strategic Planning. European Journal of Operational Research 5 (3):163-170.
    • Dyson, R.G. and Foster, M.J. (1983) Effectiveness in Strategic Planning Revisited. European Journal of Johnson, G., Scholes, K. and Whittington, R. (2005) Exploring Corporate Strategy. 7th. edn, Harlow, UK: Pearson Education Ltd. 0273687492.
    • Kauffman, S. (1995) At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity. first edn, New York, USA: Oxford University Press. 978-019-511130-9.
    • Kelly, S. (1999) What Business Can Learn from the Simple Science of Complexity. The Journal for Quality and Participation September/October (4):44-46.
    • Kettinger, W.J., Teng, J.T.C. and Guha, S. (1997) Business Process Change: A Study of Methodologies, Techniques and Tools. MIS Quarterly 14 (1):55-80.
    • Knott, P. (2008) Strategy Tools: Who Really Uses Them ? Journal of Business Strategy 29 (5):26-31.
    • Kotiadis, K. and Mingers, J. (2006) Combining PSMs with Hard OR Methods: The Philosophical and Practical Challenges. Journal of the Operational Research Society 57 (7):856-867.
    • Kurtz, C.F. and Snowden, D.J. (2003) The New Dynamics of Strategy: Sense-making in a Complex and Complicated World. IBM Systems Journal 32 (3):462-483.
    • Kvale, S. (1996) Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. London, UK: Sage Publications Ltd. 0-8039-5819-6.
    • Midgley, G. and Richardson, K.A. (2007) Systems Thinking for Community Involvement in Policy Analysis. Emergence: Complexity and Organisation 9, 167-183.
    • Miles, R.E. and Snow, C.C. (1986) Organizations: New Concepts for New Forms. California Management Review 28 (3):62-73.
    • Miller, C.C. and Ireland, R.D. (2005) Intuition in Strategic Decision Making: Friend or Foe in the Fast-Paced 21st. Century ? Academy of Management Executive 19 (1):19-30.
    • Mingers, J. (2007) Operational Research: the Science of Better ? Journal of the Operational Research Society 58 (5):683-686. 01605682.
    • Mintzberg, H. and Lampel, J. (1999) Reflecting on the Strategy Process. Sloan Management Review Spring, 107- 116.
    • Mitleton-Kelly, E. (2003a) Complex Systems and Evolutionary Perspectives on Organisations - The Application of Complexity Theory to Organisations. Oxford, UK: Pergamon/Elsevier Science Ltd. 0-08-043957-8.
    • Morecroft, J. and Robinson, S. (2005) Explaining Puzzling Dynamics: Comparing the Use of System Dynamics and Discrete Event Simulation. edn. systemdynamics.orgp. http://www.systemdynamics.org/conferences/2005/proceed/papers/MOREC107.pdf
    • Peters, T. and Waterman, R. (1982) In Search of Excellence. New York, USA: Harper & Row.
    • Pettigrew, A., Thomas, H. and Whittington, R. (2006) Handbook of Strategy Management. London, UK: Sage.
    • Pettigrew, A.M. (1990) Longitudinal Field Research on Change Theory and Practice. Organisational Science 1 (3):267-292.
    • Pettigrew, A.M. (1992) The Character and Significance of Strategy Process Research. Strategic Management Journal 13 5-16.
    • Pidd, M. (2003) Tools for Thinking: Modelling Management Science. second edn, Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 0-470-84795-6.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article