Publisher: American Psychological Association
Recognition memory for unfamiliar faces is facilitated when contextual cues (e.g., head pose, background environment, hair and clothing) are consistent between study and test. By contrast, inconsistencies in external features, especially hair, promote errors in unfamiliar face-matching tasks. For the construction of facial composites, as carried out by witnesses and victims of crime, the role of external features (hair, ears, and neck) is less clear, although research does suggest their involvement. Here, over three experiments, we investigate the impact of external features for recovering facial memories using a modern, recognition-based composite system, EvoFIT. Participant-constructors inspected an unfamiliar target face and, one day later, repeatedly selected items from arrays of whole faces, with “breeding,” to “evolve” a composite with EvoFIT; further participants (evaluators) named the resulting composites. In Experiment 1, the important internal-features (eyes, brows, nose, and mouth) were constructed more identifiably when the visual presence of external features was decreased by Gaussian blur during construction: higher blur yielded more identifiable internal-features. In Experiment 2, increasing the visible extent of external features (to match the target's) in the presented face-arrays also improved internal-features quality, although less so than when external features were masked throughout construction. Experiment 3 demonstrated that masking external-features promoted substantially more identifiable images than using the previous method of blurring external-features. Overall, the research indicates that external features are a distractive rather than a beneficial cue for face construction; the results also provide a much better method to construct composites, one that should dramatically increase identification of offenders.
The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!
- Andrews, T.J., Davies-Thompson, J., Kingstone, A., & Young, A.W. (2010). Internal and external features of the face are represented holistically in face-selective regions of visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 3544-3552. doi:10.1523/ jneurosci.4863-09.2010
- Berman, G.L., & Cutler, B.L. (1998). The influence of processing instructions at encoding and retrieval on face recognition accuracy. Psychology, Crime & Law, 4, 89-106. doi:10.1080/10683169808401751 Brace, N., Pike, G., & Kemp, R. (2000). Investigating E-FIT using famous faces. In A. Czerederecka, T. Jaskiewicz-Obydzinska & J. Wojcikiewicz (Eds.). Forensic Psychology and Law (pp. 272-276). Krakow: Institute of Forensic Research Publishers.
- Bruce, V. (1982). Changing faces: Visual and non-visual coding processes in face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 73, 105-116. doi:10.1111/j.2044- 8295.1982.tb01795.x
- Bruce, V. (1986). Influences of familiarity on the processing of faces. Perception, 15, 387-397. doi:10.1068/P150387
- Bruce, V., Henderson, Z., Greenwood, K., Hancock, P.J.B., Burton, A.M., & Miller, P. (1999). Verification of face identities from images captured on video. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 5, 339 360. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.5.4.339
- Bruce, V., Ness, H., Hancock, P.J.B, Newman, C., & Rarity, J. (2002). Four heads are better than one. Combining face composites yields improvements in face likeness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 894-902. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.894
- Bruck, M., Cavanagh, P., & Ceci, S. J. (1991). Fortysomething: Recognizing faces at ones 25th reunion. Memory & Cognition, 19, 221-228. doi:10.3758/BF03211146
- Burton, A.M., Wilson, S., Cowan, M., & Bruce, V. (1999). Face recognition in poor quality video: evidence from security surveillance. Psychological Science, 10, 243-248. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00144
- Campbell, R., Coleman, M., Walker, J., Benson, P. J., Wallace, S., Michelotti, J., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1999). When does the inner-face advantage in familiar face recognition arise and why? Visual Cognition, 6, 197-216. doi:10.1080/713756807
- Costen, N. P., Parker, D. M., & Craw, I. (1996). Effects of high-pass and low-pass spatial filtering on face identification. Perception and Psychophysics, 58, 602- 612. doi:10.3758/BF03213093
- Craw, I., & Cameron, P. (1991). Parameterising images for recognition and reconstruction. Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference, Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference (pp-367-370). Springer Verlag: London.
- Cutler, B.L., Penrod, S.D., & Martens, T.K. (1987). Improving the reliability of
- Frowd, C.D., Bruce, V., & Hancock, P.J.B. (2008). Changing the face of criminal identification. The Psychologist, 21, 670-672.
- Frowd, C.D., Bruce, V., McIntyre, A., & Hancock, P.J.B. (2007). The relative importance of external and internal features of facial composites. British Journal of Psychology, 98, 61-77. doi:10.1348/000712606x104481
- Frowd, C.D., Bruce, V., McIntyre, A., Ross, D., Fields, S., Plenderleith, Y., & Hancock, P.J.B. (2006). Implementing holistic dimensions for a facial composite system. Journal of Multimedia, 1, 42-51. doi:10.4304/JMM.1.3.42-51
- Frowd, C.D., Bruce, V., Ness, H., Bowie, L., Thomson-Bogner, C., Paterson, J., McIntyre, A., & Hancock, P.J.B. (2007). Parallel approaches to composite production. Ergonomics, 50, 562-585. doi:10.1080/00140130601154855
- Frowd, C.D., Bruce, V., Plenderleith, Y., & Hancock, P.J.B. (2006). Improving target identification using pairs of composite faces constructed by the same person. IEE Conference on Crime and Security (pp. 386-395). London:IET. doi:10.1049/ic:20060341
- Frowd, C.D., Bruce, V., Ross, D., McIntyre, A., & Hancock, P.J.B. (2007). An application of caricature: how to improve the recognition of facial composites. Visual Cognition, 15, 1-31. doi:10.1080/13506280601058951.
- Frowd, C.D., Bruce, V., Smith, A., & Hancock, P.J.B. (2008). Improving the quality of facial composites using a holistic cognitive interview. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14, 276-287. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.14.3.276
- Frowd, C.D., Carson, D., Ness, H., McQuiston, D., Richardson, J., Baldwin, H., & Hancock, P.J.B. (2005). Contemporary Composite Techniques: the impact of a forensically-relevant target delay. Legal & Criminological Psychology, 10, 63-81. doi:10.1348/135532504X15358
- Frowd, C.D., Carson, D., Ness, H., Richardson, J., Morrison, L., McLanaghan, S., & Hancock, P.J.B. (2005). A forensically valid comparison of facial composite systems. Psychology, Crime & Law, 11, 33-52. doi:10.1080/10683160310001634313
- Frowd, C.D., Hancock, P.J.B., Bruce, V., Skelton, F.C., Atherton, C., Nelson, L., et al. (2011). Catching more offenders with EvoFIT facial composites: lab research and police field trials. Global Journal of Human Social Science, 11, 46-58.
- Frowd, C.D., Hancock, P.J.B., & Carson, D. (2004). EvoFIT: A holistic, evolutionary facial imaging technique for creating composites. ACM Transactions on Applied Psychology (TAP), 1, 1-21. doi:10.1145/1008722.1008725
- Frowd, C.D., & Hepton, G. (2009). The benefit of hair for the construction of facial composite images. British Journal of Forensic Practice, 11, 15-25.
No related research data.
No similar publications.