Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Padilla de la Torre, Monica; Briefer, Elodie F.; Ochocki, Brad M.; McElligott, Alan G.; Reader, Tom (2016)
Publisher: Elsevier Masson
Languages: English
Types: Article
Individual recognition in gregarious species is fundamental in order to avoid misdirected parental investment. In ungulates, two very different parental care strategies have been identified: ‘hider’ offspring usually lie concealed in vegetation whereas offspring of ‘follower’ species remain with their mothers while they forage. These two strategies have been suggested to impact on mother-offspring vocal recognition, with unidirectional recognition of the mother by offspring occurring in hiders and bidirectional recognition in followers. In domestic cattle, Bos taurus, a facultative hider species, vocal communication and recognition have not been studied in detail under free-ranging conditions, where cows and calves can graze freely and where hiding behaviour can occur. We hypothesized that, as a hider species, cattle under these circumstances would display unidirectional vocal recognition. To test this hypothesis, we conducted playback experiments using mother-offspring contact calls. We found that cows were more likely to respond, by moving their ears and/or looking, turning or walking towards the loudspeaker, to calls of their own calves than to calls from other calves. Similarly, calves responded more rapidly, and were more likely to move their ears and/or look, turn or walk towards the loudspeaker, and to call back and/or meet their mothers, in response to calls from their own mothers than to calls from other females. Contrary to our predictions, our results suggest that mother-offspring vocal individual recognition is bidirectional in cattle. Additionally, mothers of younger calves tended to respond more strongly to playbacks than mothers of older calves. Therefore, mother responses to calf vocalizations are at least partially influenced by calf age.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Charrier, I., Aubin, T., & Mathevon. (2010). Mother-calf vocal communication in Atlantic walrus: a first field experimental study. Animal Cognition, 13, 471-482.
    • Coulon, M., Deputte B.L., Heyman, Y., Richard, C., & Delatouch, L. (2007). Visual discrimination by heifers (Bos taurus) of their own species. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 121, 198-204.
    • Coulon, M., Deputte B.L., Heyman, Y., & Baudoin C. (2009). Individual recognition in domestic cattle (Bos taurus): Evidence from 2D- images of heads from different breeds. PLOS ONE, 4, 1-8.
    • Craig, C. (2000). Goldwave V. 5.11. Goldwave, St John's. Retrieved from http://goldwave.com/
    • Espmark, Y. (1971). Individual recognition by voice in reindeer mother-young relationship. Behaviour, 40, 295-301
    • Estes, R. D., & Estes, R. K. (1979). The birth and survival of wildebeest calves. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 50, 45-95.
    • Fisher, D. O., Blomberg, S. P., & Owens, P. F. (2002). Convergent maternal care strategies in ungulates and macropods. Evolution, 56, 167-176.
    • Flower, F. C., & Weary, D. M. (2003). The effects of early separation on the dairy cow and calf. Animal Welfare, 12, 339-348.
    • Green, W. C. H. (1992). The development of independence in bison: pre-weaning spatial relations between mothers and calves. Animal Behaviour, 43, 759-773.
    • Hall, S. J. G. (1986). Chillingham cattle: dominance and affinities and access to supplementary food. Ethology, 71, 201-215.
    • Langbein, J., & Raasch, M. L. (2000). Investigations on the hiding behaviour of calves at pasture. Archives für Tierzucht-Archives of Animal Breeding, 43, 203-210.
    • Lent, P. C. (1974). Mother-infant relationships in ungulates. In V. Geist& F. Walther (Ed.), Behaviour of ungulates and its relation to management. (pp. 14-55). Morges, Switzerland: IUCN Publications.
    • Lickliter, R., & Heron J. R. (1984). Recognition of mother by newborn goats. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 12, 187-192.
    • Lingle, S., Rendall, D., & Pellis, S. M. (2007). Altruism and recognition in the antipredator defence of deer: 1. Species and individual variation in fawn distress calls. Animal Behaviour, 73, 897- 905.
    • Marchant-Forde, J. N., Marchant-Forde, R. M., & Weary, D.M. (2002). Responses of dairy cows and calves to each other´s vocalisations after early separation. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 78, 19-28.
    • McGregor, P. K. (1992). Quantifying responses to playback: one, many, or composite multivariate measures. In P. K. McGregor (Ed.) Playback and Studies of Animal Communication (pp. 79- 96). New York: Plenum Press.
    • Nowak, R., Porter, R., Lévy, F., Orgeur, P., & Schaal., B. (2000). Role of mother-young interactions in the survival of offspring in domestic mammals. Reviews of Reproduction, 5, 153-163.
    • Padilla de la Torre, M., Briefer, E.F., Reader, T., & McElligott, A. G. (2015). Acoustic analysis of cattle (Bos taurus) mother-offspring contact calls from a source-filter theory perspective. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 16, 58-68.
    • Torriani, M. V. G., Vannoni, E., & McElligott, A. G. (2006). Mother-young recognition in an ungulate hider species: a unidirectional process. American Naturalist, 168, 412-420.
    • Tucker, C.B. (2009). Behaviour of cattle. In P. Jensen (Ed.), The Ethology of domestic animals. (pp. 151-160). UK.: CABI
    • Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871-1971. (pp. 136-179). Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.
    • Veissier, I., Le Neindre, P. (1989). Weaning in calves : Its effects on social organization. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 24, 43-54.
    • Vitale, A. F., Tenucci, M., Papini, M., & Lovari, S. (1986). Social behaviour of the calves of semi-wild Maremma cattle, Bos primigenius taurus. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 16, 217-231.
    • von Keyserlingk, M. A. G., & Weary, D. M. (2007). Maternal behaviour in cattle. Hormones and Behaviour, 52, 106-113.
    • Watts, J. M., & Stookey, J. M. (2000). Vocal behaviour in cattle: the animal's commentary on its biological processes and welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 67, 15-33.
    • Zeder, M. A. (2012). Pathways to Animal Domestication. P. Gepts, T. R. Famula, R. L. Bettinger, S. B. Brush, A. B. Damania, P. E. McGuire, & C. O. Qualset (Eds.), In Biodiversity in Agriculture: Domestication, Evolution, and Sustainability. (pp. 227-259). U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article