Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Honkala, N. (2017)
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: HQ, K
Women continue to face challenges in having their asylum claims recognised under the Refugee Convention. This is to a significant extent due to the ways in which the Convention is applied to women’s claims, and is particularly the case in gender-based persecution claims. While there have been important advances in the field of gender and refugee law, contributing to an improved understanding of the relevance of gender within international refugee law, there remains a need for more gender-sensitive interpretations of the Convention. This article critiques the ways in which the political opinion ground of the Refugee Convention has been applied to some women’s forced marriage claims in the UK. Women’s gender-based persecution claims are often categorised under the membership of a particular social group ground and the political opinion ground remains an underused and narrowly interpreted category. Drawing on feminist critiques, it is argued that this demonstrates an underlying gendered politics, and that the political opinion ground can indeed be relevant to women’s asylum claims involving forced marriage. Women’s resistance to their gendered oppression in the form of forced marriage should be seen as a valid expression of their political opinion and agency.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Arbel E, Dauvergne C and Millbank J eds. (2014) Gender in Refugee Law: From the Margins to the Centre London: Routledge.
    • Asylum Aid (2007) Asylum Aid's Submission of Evidence to Independent Asylum Commission. Available at http://www.asylumaid.org.uk/wpcontent/uploads/2013/02/Submission_of_evidence_to_the_Independent_Asylum_Commissi on.pdf (accessed 5.8.2015).
    • Bitoulas A (2015) Asylum Applications and First Instance Decisions on Asylum Applications: 2014, Issue number 3/2015. Eurostat. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/4168041/6742650/KS-QA-15-003-ENN.pdf/b7786ec9-1ad6-4720-8a1d-430fcfc55018 (accessed 6.8.2015).
    • Burridge A and Gill N (2016) Conveyor-Belt Justice: Precarity, Access to Justice, and Uneven Geographies of Legal Aid in UK Asylum Appeals Antipode 1-20.
    • Ceneda S and Palmer C (2006) 'Lip Service' or Implementation?: The Home Office Gender Guidance and Women's Asylum Claims in the UK. Asylum Aid, Refugee Women's Research Project. Available at http://d2ihhomkd2yhtk.cloudfront.net/wpcontent/uploads/2013/02/Lip_Service_or_Implementation.pdf (accessed 2.8.2015).
    • Charlesworth H (1988-1999) Public/Private Distinction and the Right to Development in International Law Australian Yearbook of International Law 12: 190-204.
    • Charlesworth H, Chinkin C and Wright S (1991) Feminist Approaches to International Law American Journal of International Law 85 (4): 613-645.
    • Edwards A (2010) Transitioning Gender: Feminist Engagement With International Refugee Law and Policy 1950-2010 Refugee Survey Quarterly 29 (2): 21-45.
    • Immigration Appellate Authority (IAA) (2000) Asylum Gender Guidelines. Available at http://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b3414.html (accessed 5.8.2015).
    • International Center for Research on Women (2012) Child Marriage: Facts and Figures. Available at http://www.icrw.org/child-marriage-facts-and-figures (accessed 5.8.2015).
    • Juss S S (2013) The UNHCR Handbook and the Interface Between 'Soft Law' and 'Hard Law' in International Refugee Law. In Juss S S and Harvey C eds. Contemporary Issues in Refugee Law Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, pp. 31- 67.
    • Kelly B. (2010) What is a 'Particular Social Group'? A Review of the Development of the Refugee Convention in England Journal of Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Law 24 (1) 9-28.
    • Kneebone S (2005) Women Within the Refugee Construct: 'Exclusionary Inclusion' in Policy and Practice- the Australian Experience International Journal of Refugee Law 17 (1): 7-42.
    • UNHCR Executive Committee (1999) General Conclusion on International Protection, Conclusion No.87 (L). Available at http://www.unhcr.org/3ae68c6ec.html (accessed 5.8.2015).
    • UNHCR (2002a) UNHCR Guidelines on International Protection: Gender-Related Persecution Within the Context of Article 1 A (2) of the 1951 Convention and/or its 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees. 7 May. Geneva, Switzerland.
    • UNHCR (2002b) UNHCR Guidelines on International Protection: Membership of a Particular Social Group Within the Context of Article 1 A (2) of the 1951 Convention and/or its 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees. 7 May. Geneva. Switzerland.
    • UNHCR (1991) UNHCR Guidelines on the Protection of Refugee Women. Available at http://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b3310.html (accessed 5.8.2015).
    • United Nations (1951) Conference of Plenipotentiaries on the Status of Refugees and Stateless Persons. Document number A/CONF.2/SR.3. 19 November. Geneva, Switzerland.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article