LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Parmak, Merle (2015)
Publisher: IOS Press
Languages: English
Types: Part of book or chapter of book
Subjects: HN, H1, HT
Resilience at the level of any system reflects its capacity to manage successfully unexpected pressures without losing its structure and stability. The most generic level of resilience – national resilience – is closely related with shared vision and values in society at the level of the nation. It refers to the ability to maintain national social fabric and cohesion when confronted by threats. During massive transitions, the established boundaries of nation-states and the definition and nature of citizenship are challenged. Risks related to diverse ethnic and religious identities may not be apparent before crises arise. In expanded societies, societal fragmentation poses a threat to national security, highlighting the importance of strategic nation-building and national resilience. Nation-building is influenced by trust and practice of communication between citizens, the state and its sub-communities. In order to mitigate security risks and enhance the capacity of multinational societies to cope with crisis, there is a vital need to develop a conceptual understanding and screening methodology for national resilience.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1] K. Pratt Ewing, Immigrant identities and emotion. In C. Casey & R. B. Edgerton (Eds.), A Companion to psychological anthropology: Modernity and psychocultural change (pp. 226-240). Wiley-Blackwell, 2007.
    • [2] M. Hall, Residential integration on the new frontier: Immigrant segregation in established and new destinations, Demography 50 (2013), 1873-1896.
    • [3] C. C. Sonn, A. T. Fisher, Sense of community: Community resilient responses to oppression and change, Journal of Community Psychology 26 (1998), 457-472.
    • [4] C. W. Leach, P. M. Rodriguez Mosquera, M. L. W. Vliek, E. Hirt, Group Devaluation and group identification, Journal of Social Issues 66 (2010), 535- 552.
    • [5] G. V. Bodenhausen, S. K. Kang, D. Peery, Social categorization and the perception of social groups. In S. T. Fiske & C. N. Macrae (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social cognition, (pp. 318-336), SAGE Publications Ltd, 2012.
    • [6] M. Parmak, Psychological defence of citizenship in post-soviet society: Defensive psychological operation? Conference paper at the 6th International Conference on Strategies XXI: European security and defence in the context of economic and financial crisis, Bucharest: Carol I National Defence University, 2010.
    • [7] F. H. Norris, S. P. Stevens, B. Pfefferbaum, K. F. Wyche, R. L. Pfefferbaum, Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness, American Journal of Community Psychology 41 (2008), 127- 150.
    • [8] Bin Zhang, R. Horn, P. D. Hallett, Mechanical Resilience of degraded soil amended with organic matter. Science Society of America Journal, 69 (2005), 864-871.
    • [9] D. Stokols, R. P. Lejano, J, Hipp, Enhancing the resilience of Human-Environment Systems: A social ecological perspective, Ecology & Society 18 (2013), 1-12.
    • [10] M. Lahad, A. Shacham, O. Ayalon, O. (Eds.), The „Basic Ph“ model of coping and resiliency: Theory, research and cross-cultural application, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2013.
    • [11] G. Richardson, The metatheory of resilience and resiliency, Journal of Clinical Psychology 58 (2002), 307-321.
    • [12] T. Jermalavičius, M. Parmak, Towards a resilient society, or why Estonia does not need “psychological defence”. Occasional paper of International Centre of Defence Studies (2012), online
    • [13] R. Emmers, Comprehensive security and resilience in Southeast Asia: ASEAN's approach to terrorism. The Pacific Review 22 (2009), 159-177.
    • [14] S. Kimhi, Levels of resilience: Associations among individual, community and national resilience, Journal of Health Psychology accepted for publication (2014), accepted for publication.
    • [15] J. Coaffee, Rescaling and responsibilising the politics of urban resilience: From national security to local place-making. Politics 33 (2013), 240-252.
    • [16] B. Obrist, C. Pfeiffer, R. Henley, Multi-layered social resilience: A new approach in mitigation research. Progress in Development Studies, 10 (2010), 283-293.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article