Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Iddon, Joanna L.; Morgan, D.J.R.; Loveday, Catherine; Sahakian, Barbara J.; Pickard, J.D.
Publisher: BMJ Group
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Paper, UOW10

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: congenital, hereditary, and neonatal diseases and abnormalities, nervous system diseases
Objectives: To determine the relative impact of hydrocephalus and spinal dysraphism in young adults on\ud intellectual and cognitive functioning. Sub-groups of patients with congenital hydrocephalus and/or spina\ud bifida were assessed between 1995 and 2003. The entry criteria were that individuals should have (i) intact global function, (ii) average verbal intelligence (or above), and (iii) should not have clinical depression. There were three sub-groups: patients with hydrocephalus and spina bifida, patients with hydrocephalus without spina bifida, and patients with spina bifida without hydrocephalus.\ud Methods: Patients were neuropsychologically assessed as part of their normal clinical assessment during their annual medical review. Each individual completed a screening battery assessing global functioning, verbal intelligence, and mood. In addition they completed additional tests including measures of emotional\ud intelligence, memory, attention, and executive function. Results were analysed to compare the performance of the patient sub-groups and to compare them to a healthy control group.\ud Results: Patients with hydrocephalus (with or without spina bifida) were significantly impaired on the vast\ud majority of all test scores as compared to patients with spina bifida and healthy controls. They were particularly poor on measures assessing executive function. By contrast for patients with spina bifida with no associated hydrocephalus, the significant majority of all test scores fell within the average range or above.\ud Conclusions: The neuropsychological profile of patients with hydrocephalus is one of relative impairment and this is so whether or not spina bifida is present. In spina bifida alone, in the absence of hydrocephalus, cognitive function is relatively spared.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1 Bradbury MWB. Anatomy and physiology of cerebrospinal fluid. In: Schurr PH, Polkey CE, eds. Hydrocephalus. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
    • 2 Thompson NM, Chapieski L, Miner ME, et al. Cognitive and motor abilities in preschool hydrocephalics. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1991;13:245-58.
    • 3 Fletcher JM, Francis DJ, Thompson NM, et al. Verbal and nonverbal skill discrepancies in hydrocephalic children. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1992;14:593-609.
    • 4 Fletcher JM, Bohan TP, Brandt ME, et al. Morphometric evaluation of the hydrocephalic brain: relationships with cognitive development. Child's Nerv Syst 1996;12(4):192-9.
    • 5 Dorman C, Laatsch LK, Hurley AD. The applicability of neuropsychological test batteries for assessment of the congenitally brain disordered. Int J Clin Neuropsychol 1985;7(2):111-7.
    • 6 Horn DG, Lorch RF, Culatta B. Distractibility and vocabulary deficits in children with spina bifida and hydrocephalus. Dev Med Child Neurol 1985;27(6):713-20.
    • 7 Tew B. ''The Cocktail Party Syndrome'' in children with hydrocephalus and spina bifida. Br J Disord Commun 1979;14:447-50.
    • 8 Cull C, Wyke MA. Memory function of children with spina bifida and shunted hydrocephalus. Dev Med Child Neurol 1984;26:177-83.
    • 9 Ingram TTS, Naughton JA. Paediatric and psychological aspects of cerebral palsy associated with hydrocephalus. Dev Med Child Neurol 1962;4:287-92.
    • 10 Hagberg B, Sjorgen I. The chronic brain syndrome of infantile hydrocephalus. A follow-up study of 63 spontaneously arrested cases. Am J Dis Child 1966;112(3):189-69.
    • 11 Taylor EM. Psychological appraisal of children with cerebral deficits. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1961.
    • 12 Dennis M, Jacennik B, Barnes MA. The content of narrative discourse in children and adolescents after early-onset hydrocephalus and in normally developing age peers. Brain Lang 1994;46:129-65.
    • 13 Swisher LP, Pinsker EJ. The language characteristics of hyperverbal hydrocephalic children. Dev Med Child Neurol 1971;13:746-55.
    • 14 Fletcher JM, Barnes M, Dennis M. Language development in children with spina bifida (review). Semin Pediatr Neurol 2002;9:201-8.
    • 15 Dennis M, Barnes M. Math and numeracy in young adults with spina bifida and hydrocephalus. Dev Neuropsychol 2002;21:141-55.
    • 16 Barnes MA, Pengelly S, Dennis M, et al. Mathematics skill in good readers with hydrocephalus. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2002;8:72-82.
    • 17 Lumenta CB, Skotarczak U. Long-term follow up of 233 patients with congenital hydrocephalus. Child's Nerv Syst 1995;11(3):173-5.
    • 18 Dise LE, Lohr ME. Examination of deficits in conceptual reasoning abilities associated with spina bifida. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1998;77:247-51.
    • 19 Snow JH, Prince M, Souheaver G, et al. Neuropsychological patterns of adolescents and young adults with spina bifida. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 1994;9(3):277-87.
    • 20 Culatta B, Young C. Linguistic performance as a function of abstract task demands in children with spina bifida. Dev Med Child Neurol 1992;34(5):434-40.
    • 21 Tew BJ, Laurence KM. The clinical and psychological characteristics of children with 'cocktail party' syndrome. Z Kinderchir 1975;28:360-7.
    • 22 Appleton PL, Minchom PE, Ellis NC, et al. The self-concept of young people with spina bifida: a population-based study. Dev Med Child Neurol 1994;36:198-215.
    • 23 Appleton PL, Ellis MC, Minchom PE, et al. Depressive symptoms and selfconcept in young people with spina bifida. J Paediatr Psychol 1997;22:707-22.
    • 24 Hazlett RA. Self perceptions of preschool children with spina bifida. J Paediatr Nurs 1997;12:130-1.
    • 25 Minchom PE, Ellis NC, Appleton PL, et al. Impact of functional severity on self concept in young people with spina bifida. Arch Dis Child 1995;73:48-52.
    • 26 Hagberg B. The sequelae of spontaneously arrested infantile hydrocephalus. Dev Med Child Neurol 1962;4:583-7.
    • 27 Miller E, Sethi L. The effects of hydrocephalus perception. Dev Med Child Neurol 1971;13(suppl 25):77-81.
    • 28 Taylor EM. Psychological appraisal of children with cerebral deficits. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1961.
    • 29 Simpson D, Hemmer R. Social aspects of hydrocephalus. In: Schurr PH, Polkey CE, eds. Hydrocephalus. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
    • 30 Malm J, Kristensen B, Karlsson T, et al. A predictive value of cerebrospinal fluid dynamic tests in patients with the idiopathic adult hydrocephalus syndrome. Arch Neurol 1995;52:783-9.
    • 31 Chen IH, Huang CI, Liu HC, et al. Effectiveness of shunting in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus predicted by temporary, controlled resistance continuous lumbar drainage: a pilot study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994;57:1430-2.
    • 32 Raftopoulos C, Deleval J, Chaskis C, et al. Cognitive recovery in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a prospective study. Neurosurgery 1994;35:397-405.
    • 33 Stambrook M, Cardosa ER, Hawryluk GA, et al. Neuropsychological changes following the neurosurgical treatment of normal pressure hydrocephalus. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 1988;3:323-30.
    • 34 Iddon JL, Pickard JD, Cross JJL, et al. Specific patterns of cognitive impairment in patients with idiopathic 'normal pressure' hydrocephalus and Alzheimer's disease: a pilot study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1999;67:723-31.
    • 35 Cummings JL. Introduction. In: Cummings JL, ed. Subcortical dementia. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990, chapter 1.
    • 36 Thomsen AM, Borgeson SE, Bruhn P, et al. Prognosis of dementia in normal pressure hydrocephalus after a shunt operation. Ann Neurol 1986;20:304-10.
    • 37 Torkelson RD, Leibrock LG, Gustavson JL, et al. Neurological and neuropsychological effects of cerebral spinal fluid shunting in children with assumed arrested (''normal pressure'') hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1986;48:799-806.
    • 38 Caltagirone C, Gainotti G, Masullo C, et al. Neurophysiological study of normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1982;65(2):93-100.
    • 39 Gustafson L, Hagberg B. Recovery in hydrocephalic dementia after shunt operation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1978;41:10.
    • 40 Morgan DJR, Blackburn M, Bax M. Adults with spina bifida and/or hydrocephalus. Postgrad Med J 1995;71:17-21.
    • 41 Nelson HE. National Adult Reading Test. Test manual. Windsor, UK: NFERNELSON, 1982.
    • 42 Beck AT. Depression: causes and treatment. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1970.
    • 43 Cockrell JR, Folstein MF. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Psychopharmacol Bull, 1988;24:689-92.
    • 44 Baron-Cohen S, Jolliffe T, Mortimore C, et al. Another advanced test of theory of mind: evidence from very high functioning adults with autism or Asperger syndrome. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1997;38:813-22.
    • 45 Benton AL, Hamshire K de S. Multilingual Aphasia Examination. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa, 1976.
    • 46 Owen AM, Downes JD, Sakakian BJ, et al. Planning and spatial working memory following frontal lobe lesions in man. Neuropsychologia 1990;28:1021-34.
    • 47 Owen AM, Sahakian BJ, Semple J, et al. Visuo-spatial short-term recognition memory and learning after temporal lobe excisions or amygdalohippocampectomy in man. Neuropsychologia 1995;33:1-24.
    • 48 Milner B. Interhemispheric differences in the localisation of psychological processes in man. Br Med Bull 1971;27:272-77.
    • 49 Downes JJ, Roberts AC, Sahakian BJ, et al. Impaired extra-dimensional shift performance in medicated and unmedicated Parkinson's disease: evidence for a specific attentional dysfunction. Neuropsychologia 1989;27:1239-343.
    • 50 Owen AM, James M, Leigh PN, et al. Fronto-striatal cognitive deficits at different stages of Parkinson's disease. Brain 1992;115:1727-51.
    • 51 Spreen O, Strauss E. A compendium of neuropsychological tests. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.
    • 52 Benedict RHB, Schretlen D, Groninger L, et al. Hopkins Verbal Learning TestRevised: Normative data and analysis of inter-form and test-retest reliability. Clin Neuropsychol 1998;12:43-55.
    • 53 Landry S. Goal-directed behaviour and perception of self-competence in children with spina bifida. J Pediatric Psychol 1993;18:389-96.
    • 54 Ineichen R. Towards co-ordinated care of spina bifida children. Soc Work Today 1973;4:321-4.
    • 55 Fletcher JM, Brookshire BL, Landry SH, et al. Behavioural adjustment of children with hydrocephalus: relationships with etiology, neurological and family status. J Pediatr Psychol 1995;20:109-25.
    • 56 Campbell S. Early prenatal diagnosis of neural tube defects by ultrasound. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1977;20:351-9.
    • 57 Spaulding BR, Morgan SB. Spina bifida and their parents: a population prone to family dysfunction. J Pediatr Psychol 1986;11:359-74.
    • 58 Fishman R. Normal pressure hydrocephalus and arthritis. N Engl J Med 1985;312:1255-6.
    • 59 Sobkowiak CA. Effect of hydrocephalus on neuronal migration and maturation. Eur J Pediatric Surg 1992;2(suppl 1):7-11.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article