Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Gilson, L (2015)
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Languages: English
Types: Part of book or chapter of book
This Handbook brings together a collection of leading international authors to reflect on the influence of central contributions, or classics, that have shaped the development of the field of public policy and administration. The Handbook reflects on a wide range of key contributions to the field, selected on the basis of their international and wider disciplinary impact. Focusing on classics that contributed significantly to the field over the second half of the 20th century, it offers insights into works that have explored aspects of the policy process, of particular features of bureaucracy, and of administrative and policy reforms. Each classic is discussed by a leading international scholars. They offer unique insights into the ways in which individual classics have been received in scholarly debates and disciplines, how classics have shaped evolving research agendas, and how the individual classics continue to shape contemporary scholarly debates. In doing so, this volume offers a novel approach towards considering the various central contributions to the field. The Handbook offers students of public policy and administration state-of-the-art insights into the enduring impact of key contributions to the field
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Argyris, C., 1964. Integrating the individual and the organization, New York: Wiley.
    • Barrett, S.M., 2004. Implementation Studies: Time for a Revival? Personal Reflections on 20 Years of Implementation Studies. Public Administration, 82(2), pp.249-262.
    • Berenson, M.P., 2010. Serving Citizens: How Comparable Are Polish and Russian “Street-Level” Bureaucrats? Comparative Political Studies , 43(5), pp.578- 605.
    • Bergen, A. & While, A., 2005. “Implementation deficit ” and “ street-level bureaucracy”: policy , practice and change in the development of community nursing issues. Health and Social Care in the Community, 13(1), pp.1-10.
    • Van Blijswijk, J.A.M. et al., 2004. Beyond Ethical Codes: The Management of Integrity in the Netherlands Tax and Customs Administration. Public Administration Review, 64(6), pp.718-727.
    • Bochel, H. & Evans, A., 2007. Inclusive policy making. In H. Bochel & S. Duncan, eds. Making Policy in Theory and Practice. Bristol: The Policy Press.
    • Bovens, M., 1998. The Quest for Responsibility: Accountability and Citizenship in Complex Organisations, Cambridge University Press.
    • Brewer, G.A., 2005. In the Eye of the Storm: Frontline Supervisors and Federal Agency Performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(4), pp.505-527.
    • Brodkin, E., 2012. Reflections on Street‐Level Bureaucracy: Past, Present, and Future. Public Administration Review, 72(6), pp.940-949.
    • Chapman, J., 2004. System failure: why governments must learn to think differently Second edi., Demos.
    • Davis, K.C., 1969. Discretionary justice: A preliminary inquiry, Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
    • Downs, A., 1967. Inside Bureaucracy, Boston, Mass.: Little Brown.
    • Durose, C., 2009. Front-Line Workers and “Local Knowledge”: Neighbourhood Stories in Contemporary Uk Local Governance. Public Administration, 87(1), pp.35-49.
    • Durose, C., 2011. Revisiting Lipsky: Front-Line Work in UK Local Governance. Political Studies, 59(4), pp.978-995.
    • Dworkin, R., 1977. Taking Rights Seriously, London: Duckworth.
    • Ellis, K., 2007. Direct Payments and Social Work Practice: The Significance of “Street-Level Bureaucracy” in Determining Eligibility. British Journal of Social Work, 37(3), pp.405-422.
    • Ellis, K., 2011. “Street-level Bureaucracy” Revisited: The Changing Face of Frontline Discretion in Adult Social Care in England. Social Policy & Administration, 45(3), pp.221-244.
    • Elmore, R.F., 1979. Backward mapping: Implementation research and policy decisions. Political Science Quarterly, 94(4), pp.601-616.
    • Evans, T., 2010. Professionals, Managers and Discretion: Critiquing Street-Level Bureaucracy. British Journal of Social Work, 41(2), pp.368-386.
    • Evans, T. & Harris, J., 2004. Street-Level Bureaucracy, Social Work and the (Exaggerated) Death of Discretion. British Journal of Social Work , 34 (6 ), pp.871-895.
    • Finlay, S. & Sandall, J., 2009. “'Someone s rooting for you '”: Continuity, advocacy and street-level bureaucracy in UK maternal healthcare. Social Science & Medicine, 69, pp.1228-1235.
    • Friedman, B., 2006. Policy analysis as organizational analysis. In M. Moran, M. Rein, & R. E. Goodin, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press, pp. 482-495.
    • Ghaye, T., 2008. Building the Reflective Healthcare Organisation, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
    • Giddens, A., 1984. The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
    • Gilson, L., 2003. Trust and health care as a social institution. Social Science & Medicine, 56(67), pp.1452-1468.
    • Gilson, L., 2007. Acceptability, Trust and Equity. In D. Mcintyre & G. Mooney, eds. The Economics of Health Equity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    • Gilson, L., 2012. Health systems and institutions. In R. Smith & K. Hanson, eds. Health systems in low- and middle-income countries: an economic and policy perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Gilson, L., Palmer, N. & Schneider, H., 2005. Trust and health worker performance: exploring a conceptual framework using South African evidence. Social Science & Medicine, 61(7), pp.1418-29.
    • Goudge, J. et al., 2009. The household costs of health care in rural South Africa with free public primary care and hospital exemptions for the poor. Tropical Medicine and International Health, 14(458-467).
    • Halliday, S. et al., 2009. Street-level bureaucracy, interprofessional relations, and coping mechanisms: a study of criminal justice social workers in the sentencing process. Law and Policy, 31(4), pp.405-428.
    • Harrison, A. et al., 2000. Barriers to implementing South Africa's Termination of Pregnancy Act in rural KwaZulu/Natal. Health Policy & Planning, 15(4), pp.424-431.
    • Hill, H.C., 2003. Understanding Implementation: Street-Level Bureaucrats' Resources for Reform. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(3), pp.265-282.
    • Hill, M. & Hupe, P.L., 2009. Implementing Public Policy. An Introduction to the Study of Operational Governance 2nd editio., Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Ltd.
    • Horton, S., 2006. The double burden on safety net providers: placing health disparities in the context of the privatization of health care in the US. Social Science & Medicine, 63, pp.2702-2714.
    • Hudson, J. & Lowe, S., 2004. Understanding the Policy Process: Analysing Welfare Policy and Practice, Bristol: The Policy Press.
    • Hupe, P. & Hill, M., 2007. Street-Level Bureaucracy and Public Accountability. Public Administration, 85(2), pp.279-299.
    • Jewell, C.J. & Glaser, B.E., 2006. Towards a General Analytic Framework: Organizarional Settings, Policy Goals and Street Level Behavior Administration & Society. 38(3) pp.335-364
    • Keiser, L., 2010. Understanding Street‐Level Bureaucrats' Decision Making: Determining Eligibility in the Social Security Disability Program. Public Administration Review, pp.247-258.
    • Laws, D. & Hajer, M.A., 2006. Policy in Practice. In M. Moran, M. Rein, & R. Goodin, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 409-424.
    • Lehmann, U. & Gilson, L., 2013. Actor interfaces and practices of power in a community health worker programme: a South African study of unintended policy outcomes. Health Policy and Planning, 28(4) pp.358-366.
    • Lewin, S. et al., 2008. Supporting the delivery of cost-effective interventions in primary health-care systems in low-income and middle-income countries: an overview of systematic reviews. Lancet, 372(9642), pp.928-39.
    • Lipsky, M., 1980. Street-level bureaucracy: dilemmas of the individual in public services, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
    • Lipsky, Michael, 2010. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services 30th anniv., New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
    • Loyens, K. & Maesschalck, J., 2010. Toward a Theoretical Framework for Ethical Decision Making of Street-Level Bureaucracy Existing Models Reconsidered. Administration & Society, pp.1-35.
    • Marinetto, M., 2011. A Lipskian Analysis of Child Protection Failures From Victoria Climbié To “Baby P”: A Street-Level Re-Evaluation of Joined-Up Governance. Public Administration, 89(3), pp.1164-1181.
    • Markström, U., Lindqvist, R. & Sandlund, M., 2009. Case management for people with psychiatric disabilities in rural Sweden; experiences from the implementation of a national policy. European Journal of Social Work, 12(4), pp.495-508.
    • May, P.J. & Winter, S.C., 2007. Politicians, Managers, and Street-Level Bureaucrats: Influences on Policy Implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(3), pp.453-476.
    • Maynard-Moody, S. & Musheno, M., 2000. State agent or citizen agent: two narratives of discretion. Journal of Public Administration Research 10(2), pp.329-358.
    • McCoy, D.C., Hall, J.A. & Ridge, M., 2012. A systematic review of the literature for evidence on health facility committees in low- and middle-income countries. Health Policy and Planning , 27 (6 ), pp.449-466.
    • McGregor, D., 1960. The human side of enterprise., New York: McGraw-Hill.
    • Mintzberg, H., 2009. Managing, San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
    • Molyneux, S. et al., 2012. Community accountability at peripheral health facilities: a review of the empirical literature and development of a conceptual framework. Health policy and planning, 27(7), pp.541-54.
    • Moore, M.H., 1995. Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    • Niskanen, W., 1971. Bureaucracy and Representative Government, Chicago, Ill.: Aldine-Atherton.
    • Parsons, D.W., 1995. Public policy: an introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis, Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
    • Pennay, A.E., 2012. “Wicked problems”: The social conundrum presented by public drinking laws. Drugs: Education, Prevention, and Policy, 19(3), pp.185-191.
    • Piore, M.J., 2011. Beyond Markets: Sociology, street-level bureaucracy, and the management of the public sector. Regulation & Governance, 5(1), pp.145- 164.
    • Pressman, J.L. & Wildavsky, A., 1973. Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington are Dashed in Oakland : Or, why It's Amazing that Federal Programs Work at All, this Being a Saga of the Economic Development Rice, D., 2013. Street-Level Bureaucrats and the Welfare State: Toward a MicroInstitutionalist Theory of Policy Implementation. Administration & Society, 45(9), pp.1038-1062.
    • Rothstein, B., 1998. Just Institutions Matter: The Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare State, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    • Rothstein, B. & Stolle, D., 2001. Social capital and street-level bureaucracy: An institutional theory of generalized trust. In ESF Conference Social Capital: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Exeter 15-20 September 2001.
    • Rothstein, B. & Stolle, D., 2008. The state and social capital: an institutionalized theory of generalized trust. Comparative Politics, 40(4), pp.441-459.
    • Rowe, M., 2012. Going back to the street: revisiting Lipsky's street-level bureaucracy. Teaching Public Administration, 31(1), pp.10-18.
    • Russell, S. & Gilson, L., 2006. Are health services protecting the livelihoods of the urban poor in Sri Lanka? Findings from two low-income areas of Colombo. Social Science & Medicine, 63(7), pp.1732-1744.
    • Saario, S., 2012. Managerial reforms and specialised psychiatric care: a study of resistive practices performed by mental health practitioners. Sociology of health & illness, 34(6), pp.896-910.
    • Schon, D., 1983. The reflective practitioner, London: Temple Smith.
    • Sheikh, K. et al., 2011. Building the Field of Health Policy and Systems Research : Framing the Questions. PLoS Medicine, 8(8), pp.1-6.
    • Ssengooba, F. et al., 2007. Health sector reforms and human resources for health in Uganda and Bangladesh: mechanisms of effect. Human Resources for health, 5(1), p.3.
    • Staranova, K. & Malikova, L., 2007. Political Science Approach towards the Study of Corruption. Sociologia - Slovak Sociological Review, 39(4), pp.375-380.
    • Summers, A. & Semrud-Clikeman, M., 2000. Implemetation of the IDEA by school psychologists: An exploratory study using the theory of street-level bureaucracy. School Psychology Quarterly,, 15(3), pp.255-278.
    • Tibandebage, P. & Mackintosh, M., 2005. The market shaping of charges, trust and abuse: health care transactions in Tanzania. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 61(7), pp.1385-95.
    • Walker, L. & Gilson, L., 2004. “We are bitter but we are satisfied”: nurses as street-level bureaucrats in South Africa. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 59(6), pp.1251-61.
    • Wastell, D. et al., 2010. Children's services in the iron cage of performance management: street-level bureaucracy and the spectre of Švejkism. International Journal of Social Welfare, 19(3), pp.310-320.
    • Weick, K.E., 2009. Making sense of the organization: the impermanent organization Vol. 2., Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
    • Wenger, E., 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    • Wilson, J.Q., 1978. Varieties of Police Behaviour: The Management of Law and Order in Eight Communities, Harvard University Press.
    • Ydreborg, B., Ekberg, K. & Nilsson, K., 2008. Swedish social insurance officers' experience of their working conditions when dealing with applications for disability pension. Work: A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation, 31(4), pp.451-9.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article