LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: Institute of Physics
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: TA
During the demoulding stage of the hot embossing process, the force required to separate a polymer part from the mould should be minimized to avoid the generation of structural defects for the produced micro structures. However, the demoulding force is dependent on a number of process factors, which include the material properties, the demoulding temperature, the polymer pressure history and the design of the mould structures. In particular, these factors affect the chemical, physical and mechanical interactions between a polymer and the replication master during demoulding. The focus of the reported research is on the development and validation of an analytical model that takes into account the adhesion, friction and deformation phenomena to predict the required demoulding force in hot embossing under different processing conditions. The results indicate that the model predictions agree well with the experimental data obtained and confirm that the design of the mould affects the resulting demoulding force. In addition, the applied embossing load was observed to have a significant effect on demoulding. More specifically, the increase in pressure within the polymer raises the adhesion force while it also reduces the friction force due to the decrease in the thermal stress.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Bhushan B 2003 Adhesion and stiction: mechanisms, measurement techniques, and methods for reduction J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 21 2262-96
    • Colton J S, Crawford J, Pham G, Rodet V and Wang K K 2001 Failure of rapid prototype molds during injection molding CIRP Ann. 50 129-32
    • Delaney K, Bissacco G and Kennedy D 2010 A study of demoulding force prediction applied to periodic mould surface profiles ANTEC'10: Society of Plastics Engineers Annu. Technical Conf. pp 1279-84
    • Derjaguin B V, Muller V M and Toporov Y P 1975 Effect of contact deformations on the adhesion of particles J. Colloid Interface Sci. 53 314-26
    • Dirckx M 2010 Demolding of hot embossed polymer microstructures PhD Thesis Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
    • Dirckx M and Hardt D E 2011 Analysis and characterization of demolding of hot embossed polymer microstructures J. Micromech. Microeng. 21 1-10
    • Dirckx M, Taylor H K and Hardt D E 2007 High-temperature de-molding for cycle time reduction in hot embossing ANTEC'07: Society of Plastics Engineers Annu. Technical Conf. pp 2926-30
    • Elkaseer A M, Dimov S S, Popov K B, Negm M and Minev R 2012 Modeling the material microstructure effects on the surface generation process in microendmilling of dual-phase materials J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 134 044501
    • Esch M B, Kapur S, Irizarry G and Genova V 2003 Influence of master fabrication techniques on the characteristics of embossed microfluidic channels Lab Chip 3 121-7
    • Gerberich W W and Cordill M J 2006 Physics of adhesion Rep. Prog. Phys. 69 2157-203
    • Griffiths C A, Dimov S S, Scholz S, Hirshy H and Tosello G 2011 Process factors influence on cavity pressure behaviour on microinjection moulding J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 133 031007
    • Guo Y, Liu G, Xiong Y, Jun W, Xilong H and Tian Y 2007a Study of hot embossing using nickel and Ni-PTFE LIGA mold inserts J. Microelectromech. Syst. 16 589-97
    • Guo Y, Liu G, Xiong Y and Tian Y 2007b Study of the demolding process-implications for thermal stress, adhesion and friction control J. Micromech. Microeng. 17 9-19
    • Haisma J, Verheijein M, van den Heuvel K and van den Berg J 1996 Mold-assisted nanolithography: A process for reliable pattern replication J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 14 4124
    • Hansen H N, Hocken R J and Tosello G 2011 Replication of micro and nano surface geometries CIRP Ann. 60 695-714
    • He Y, Fu J-Z and Chen Z-C 2005 Research on modeling of hot embossing polymeric microfluidic chip J. Zhejiang Univ. 39 1911-4
    • Hirai Y, Yoshida S and Takagi N 2003 Defect analysis in thermal nanoimprint lithography J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 21 2765-70
    • Hsueh C-H, Lee S, Lin H-Y, Chen L-S and Wang W-H 2006 Analyses of mechanical failure in nanoimprint processes Mater. Sci. Eng. A 433 316-22
    • Jaszewski R W, Schift H, Schnyder B, Schneuwly A and Gro¨ning P 1999 The deposition of anti-adhesive ultra-thin teflon-like films and their interaction with polymers during hot embossing Appl. Surf. Sci. 143 301-8
    • Johnson K L, Kendall K and Roberts A D 1971 Surface energy and the contact of elastic solids Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 324 301-13
    • Kendall K 1973 Shrinkage and peel strength of adhesive joints J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 6 1782-7
    • Lin C-R, Chen R-H and Hung C 2003 Preventing non-uniform shrinkage in open-die hot embossing of PMMA microstructures J. Mater. Process. Technol. 140 173-8
    • Menges G and Mohren P 1986 How to Make Injection Moulds (New York: Hanser)
    • Park S, Schift H, Padeste C, Schnyder B, Ko¨tz R and Gobrecht J 2004 Anti-adhesive layers on nickel stamps for nanoimprint lithography Microelectron. Eng. 73-74 196-201
    • Park S, Song Z, Brumfield L, Amirsadeghi A and Lee J 2009 Demolding temperature in thermal nanoimprint lithography Appl. Phys. A 97 395-402
    • Pham G T and Colton J S 2002 Ejection force modeling for stereolithography injection molding tools Polym. Eng. Sci. 42 681-93
    • Prokopovich P and Starov V 2011 Adhesion models: from single to multiple asperity contacts Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 168 210-22
    • Prokopovich P, Theodossiades S, Rahnejat H and Hodson D 2010 Nano- and component level scale friction of rubber seals in dispensing devices Wear 268 845-52
    • Saha B, Liu E, Tor S B, Khun N W, Hardt D E and Chun J H 2010 Replication performance of Si-N-DLC-coated Si micro-molds in micro-hot-embossing J. Micromech. Microeng. 20 045007
    • Song Z, Choi J, You B H, Lee J and Park S 2008 Simulation study on stress and deformation of polymeric patterns during the demolding process in thermal imprint lithography J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 26 598-605
    • Titomanlio G and Jansen K M B 1996 In-mold shrinkage and stress prediction in injection molding Polym. Eng. Sci. 36 2041-9
    • Trabadelo V, Schift H, Merino S, Bellini S and Gobrecht J 2008 Measurement of demolding forces in full wafer thermal nanoimprint Microelectron. Eng. 85 907-9
    • Worgull M 2009 Hot Embossing: Theory and Technology of Microreplication (Oxford: Elsevier)
    • Worgull M and Heckele M 2004 New aspects of simulation in hot embossing Microsyst. Technol. 10 432-7
    • Worgull M, Heckele M and Schomburg W K 2005 Large-scale hot embossing Microsyst. Technol. 12 110-5
    • Worgull M, He´tu J-F, Kabanemi K K and Heckele M 2008a Hot embossing of microstructures: characterization of friction during demolding Microsyst. Technol. 14 767-73
    • Worgull M, Kabanemi K K, Marcotte J-P, He´tu J-F and Heckele M 2008b Modeling of large area hot embossing Microsyst. Technol. 14 1061-6
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article