Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Languages: English
Types: Unknown
Subjects: H200
It is known that the application of a ring beam is an effective method to prevent an out-of-plane collapse mechanism of perimeter wall panels. However this effective reinforcing method presents some problems. In order to address this, this paper describes the problems associated with this reinforcing method and studies a new technique for reinforcing historic masonry buildings by realizing a new type of ring beam made of recycled old stones or bricks reinforced at the bed joints with glass-fibre sheets, GFRP (Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer) grids or/and PBO (polybenzoxazole: poly-p-phenylene benzobisoxazole) cords. An experimental investigation has been carried out on 8 full-scale rubble-stone or brickwork masonry ring beams tested in bending. The testing included the use of composite materials inserted into the mortar joints during the fabrication phase of the beams and pinned end conditions (four-point bending configuration). Beams were reinforced with different reinforcement layout.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Alexandris, A., Protopapa, E. & Psycharis, I. 2004. Collapse mechanisms of masonry buildings derived by the distinct element method. In Proceedings of the 13th world conference on earthquake engineering.
    • ASTM D2256 2002. Standard test method for tensile properties of yarns by the single-strand method.
    • Binda, L., Gambarotta, L., Lagomarsino, S. & Modena, C. 1999. A multilevel approach to the damage assessment and seismic improvement of masonry buildings in Italy. Seismic damage to masonry buildings. Balkema, Rotterdam, 170- 195.
    • Borri, A., Castori, G. & Grazini, A. 2009. Retrofitting of masonry building with reinforced masonry ring-beam. Construction and Building Materials 23(5): 1892-1901.
    • Borri, A., Castori, G., Corradi, M. & Sisti, R. 2014. Masonry wall panels with GFRP and steel-cord strengthening subjected to cyclic shear: An experimental study. Construction and Building Materials 56:63-73.
    • Borri, A., Corradi, M., Sisti, R., Buratti, C., Belloni, E. & Moretti, E. 2015. Masonry wall panels retrofitted with thermal-insulating GFRP-reinforced jacketing. Materials and Structures.
    • Cangi, G. 2012. Manuale del recupero strutturale e antisismico. [in Italian] Ed. DEI, Rome.
    • Castori, G., Borri, A. & Corradi, M. 2015. Behavior of thin masonry arches repaired using composite materials. Journal of Composites, part B.
    • Corradi, M., Borri, A. & Vignoli, A. 2008. Experimental evaluation of the in-plane shear behaviour of masonry walls retrofitted using conventional and innovative methods. Masonry International 21(1): 29-42.
    • Corradi, M., Borri, A., Castori, G. & Sisti, R. 2014. Shear strengthening of wall panels through jacketing with cement mortar reinforced by GFRP grids. Composites Part B: Engineering 64: 33-42.
    • D'Ayala, D. & Speranza, E. 2003. Definition of collapse mechanisms and seismic vulnerability of historic masonry buildings. Earthquake Spectra 19(3): 479-509.
    • Frumento, S., Giovinazzi, S., Lagomarsino, S. & Podestà, S. 2006. Seismic retrofitting of unreinforced masonry buildings in Italy.
    • Furukawa, A. & Ohta, Y. 2009. Failure process of masonry buildings during earthquake and associated casualty risk evaluation. Natural hazards 49(1), 25-51.
    • Gattesco, N. & Dudine, A. 2010. Effectiveness of masonry strengthening technique made with a plaster reinforced with a GFRP net. In Proc. 8th International Masonry Conference 5-9 July 2010, Dresden, Germany.
    • Giuffrè, A. 1995. Seismic damage in historic town centres and attenuation criteria.
    • Huang, X., Birman, V., Nanni, A. & Tunis, G. 2005. Properties and potential for application of steel reinforced polymer and steel reinforced grout composites. Compos: Part B 36:73-82.
    • Javed, M., Naeem, A., Penna, A. & Magenes, G. 2005. Behavior of masonry structures during the Kashmir 2005 earthquake. In Proc. Of the First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Geneva, Switzerland, Paper (No. 1093).
    • Magenes, G., Penna, A., Senaldi, I. E., Rota, M. & Galasco, A. 2014. Shaking Table Test of a Strengthened Full-Scale Stone Masonry Building with Flexible Diaphragms. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 8(3): 349-375.
    • Papanicolaou, C.G., Triantafillou, T.C., Papathanasiou, M. & Karlos, K. 2008. Textile reinforced mortar (TRM) versus FRP as strengthening material of URM walls: out-of-plane cyclic loading. Materials and Structures 41:143-157.
    • Penazzi, D., Valluzzi, M. R., Saisi, A., Binda, L. & Modena, C. 2001. Repair and strengthening of historic masonry buildings in seismic areas. In Proc. International congress, more than two thousand years in the history of architecture safeguarding the structure of our architectural heritage, Bethlehem, Palestine (pp. 1-6).
    • Prota, A., Marcari, G., Fabbrocino, G., Manfredi, G. & Aldea, C. Experimental in-plane behavior of tuff masonry strengthened with cementitious matrix-grid composites Journal of Composites for Construction 10 (3): 223-233.
    • Roca, P. & Araiza, G. 2010. Shear response of brick masonry small assemblages strengthened with bonded FRP laminates for in-plane reinforcement. Construction and Building Materials 24(8): 1372-1384.
    • Tumialan, J. G., Micelli, F. & Nanni, A. 2001. Strengthening of masonry structures with FRP composites (pp. 21-23). University of Missouri, Rolla.
    • UNI EN 12390-3 2009. Testing hardened concrete, Part 3: Compressive strength of test specimens.
    • UNI EN 1926 2007. Natural stone test methods - Determination of uniaxial compressive strength.
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article