LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Sutton, Paul (2016)
Publisher: University of Cumbria
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Z489
In this paper I seek to reflexively theorise the following pedagogical problem: why do so many students adopt a strategic approach to studying and value assessment for the grade awarded rather than as a learning opportunity? Firstly, I differentiate my sociological perspective from the phenomenographic perspective, and argue that the strategic approach is worthy of serious analysis. Secondly, I deploy the concepts social character and the social individual to argue that the strategic approach is a product of extrinsic rather than intrinsic forces: it emanates from within the social relations of contemporary capitalism. Thirdly, I frame the strategic approach as academic labour using concepts from Marx’s labour theory of value: use and exchange value, concrete and abstract labour. This enables me to explain how assessment has become commodified and why students have a limiting quasi-market concept of value that privileges grades over learning. Finally, I argue that Marx’s dialectical method of enquiry enables practitioners to not only deconstruct the strategic approach to studying but also to challenge it.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Barnett, R. (2011) Being a University. London: Routledge.
    • Birdwell, J. Scott, R. and Reynolds, L. (2015) Character Nation. A Demos Report with the Jubilee Centre for Character & Virtues. London: Demos.
    • Bloch, E. (1986) The Principle of Hope, Vol 1 &2. Cambridge Massachusetts: MIT Press.
    • Cohen, G. A. (1978) Karl Marx's Theory of History. A Defence. Princetown New Jersey: Princetown University Press.
    • Dinerstein, A. (1997) 'Marxism and Subjectivity: searching for the marvellous. (Prelude to a Marxist notion of action)', Common Sense, 22, pp. 83-96.
    • Entwistle, N. (2009) Teaching for Understanding at University. Deep Approaches and Distinctive Ways of Thinking. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
    • Entwistle, N. (2000) Promoting Deep learning Through teaching and Assessment: Conceptual Frameworks and Educational Contexts, paper presented at the TLRP conference Leicester.
    • Entwistle, N. and Ramsden, P.R. (1983) Understanding Student Learning. London: Croom Helm.
    • Finlay. L. (2002) 'Negotiating the swamp: the opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice', Qualitative Research, 2(2), pp. 209-330.
    • Fromm, E. (1960) Fear of Freedom. London: Routledge.
    • Fromm, E. (1962) Beyond the Chains of Illusion. My Encounters with Marx and Freud. New York: Simon and Schuster.
    • Fromm, E. (1963) The Sane Society. London: Routledge.
    • Fromm, E. (2003) Man For Himself. An Inquiry into the Psychology of Ethics. London: Routledge.
    • Fromm, E. (2011) Marx's Concept of Man. With a Translation from Marx's Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts by T.B. Bottomore. New York: Frederick Ungar Publishing.
    • Harvie, D. (2006) 'Value-production and struggle in the classroom', Capital and Class, 88, pp.1-32.
    • Holloway, J. (2010) Crack Capitalism. London: Pluto.
    • Lewin, K. (1945) 'The Research Centre for Group Dynamics', Sociometry, 8(2):126-136.
    • Liff, R.,Rovio-Johansson, A. (2014) 'Students' understanding of theory in undergraduate education', Teaching in Higher education, 19(4), pp. 419-431.
    • Meyerson, D. E. (2001) Tempered Radicals. How People Use Difference to Inspire Change at Work. Boston Harvard Business School Press.
    • Olmann, B. (1976) Alienation. Marx's Conception of Man in Capitalist Society. Cambridge: CUP.
    • Ramsden, P. (2003) Learning to Teach in Higher Education. (2nd edition). London: Routledge.
    • Sennett, R. (1998) The Corrosion of Character. The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism. London: W.W. Norton & Co.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article