Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:

OpenAIRE is about to release its new face with lots of new content and services.
During September, you may notice downtime in services, while some functionalities (e.g. user registration, login, validation, claiming) will be temporarily disabled.
We apologize for the inconvenience, please stay tuned!
For further information please contact helpdesk[at]openaire.eu

fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Terhune, Devin Blair (2014)
Publisher: McGill University
Languages: English
Types: Article
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Barber, T. X. (1999). A comprehensive three-dimensional theory of hypnosis. In I. Kirsch, A. Capafons, E. Cardeña-Buelna & S. Amigo (Eds.), Clinical hypnosis and self-regulation: Cognitive-behavioral perspectives (pp. 21-48). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
    • Cardeña, E. (2005). eTh phenomenology of deep hypnosis: Quiescent and physically active. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 53, 37-59. doi: 10.1080/00207140490914234
    • Cardeña, E., Jonsson, P., Terhune, D. B., & Marcusson-Clavertz, D. (2013). eTh neurophenomenology of neutral hypnosis. Cortex, 49, 375-385. doi: 10.1016/J. Cortex.2012.04.001
    • Christensen, C. C. (2005). Preferences for descriptors of hypnosis: A brief communication. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 53, 281-289. doi: 10.1080/00207140590961358
    • Kihlstrom, J. F., & Register, P. A. (1984). Op - timal scoring of amnesia on the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 32, 51-57.
    • Kirsch, I., Cardeña, E., Derbyshire, S., Dienes, Z., Heap, M., Kallio, S., . . . Whalley, M. (2011). Definitions of hypnosis and hypnotizability and their relation to suggestion and suggestibility: A consensus statement. Contemporary Hypnosis and Integrative eThrapy , 28, 107-115.
    • Pekala, R. J., & Kumar, V. K. (2007). An empirical-phenomenological approach to quantifying consciousness and states of consciousness: With particular reference to understanding the nature of hypnosis. In G. A. Jamieson (Ed.), Hypnosis and conscious states: eTh cognitive neuroscience perspective (pp. 167-194). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    • Terhune, D. B., & Cardeña, E. (2010). Diefr - ential patterns of spontaneous experiential response to a hypnotic induction: A latent profile analysis. Consciousness and Cognition, 19, 1140-1150.
    • Terhune, D. B., Cardeña, E., & Lindgren, M. (2011). Dissociative tenden - cies and individual diefrences in high hypnotic suggestibility. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 16, 113-135. doi: 10.1080/13546805.2010.503048
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
More information Ok