LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
The Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DOLS) are the rules by which people who lack mental capacity can be deprived of liberty, most commonly in care homes or hospitals but also in supported accommodation and in the community more broadly. The present DOLS are not viewed as a success, and the Law Commission has a mandate reconsider a the legal framework for them. This paper is to start a debate as to what those revisions might look like.\ud \ud The paper argues that the current focus on deprivation of liberty as contained in Article 5 of the ECHR is insufficient, both because the law is moving beyond this, and also because it has resonance with neither the professional carers who are likely to be the primary administrators of the new system nor the people perceived to lack capacity and their families. Our starting point should instead be to ask what will have a practical and beneficial effect on the rights and experiences of the individuals concerned. \ud \ud The paper further considers the advantages and disadvantages of a system restricted to people lacking mental capacity. It makes tentative proposals as to administrative systems which might be used as a basis for discussion, and proposes that enhanced use of advocates may be a useful approach.
  • No references.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article