Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers .
Languages: English
Types: Other
Recent concerns over energy security and environmental considerations have highlighted the importance of finding alternative aviation fuels. It is expected that coal and biomass derived fuels will fulfil a substantial part of these energy requirements. However, because of the physical and chemical difference in the composition of these fuels, there are potential problems associated with the efficiency and the emissions of the combustion process. Over the past 25 years Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) has become increasingly popular with the gas turbine industry as a design tool for establishing and optimising key parameters of systems prior to starting expensive trials. In this paper the performance of a typical aviation fuel, kerosene, an alternative aviation fuel, biofuel and a blend have been examined using CFD modelling. A good knowledge of the kinetics of the reaction of bio aviation fuels at both high and low temperature is necessary to perform reliable simulations of ignition, combustion and emissions in aero-engine. A novel detailed reaction mechanism was used to represent aviation fuel oxidation mechanism. The fuel combustion is calculated using a 3D commercial solver using a mixture fraction/pdf approach. Firstly, the study demonstrates that CFD predictions compare favourably with experimental data obtained by QinetiQ for a Modern Airspray Combustor (MAC) when used with traditional jet fuel (kerosene). Furthermore, the 3D CFD model has been refined to use the laminar flamelet model (LFM) approach that incorporates recently developed chemical reaction mechanisms for the bio-aviation fuel. This has enabled predictions for the bio-aviation fuel to be made. The impact of using the blended fuel has been shown to be very similar in performance to that of the 100% kerosene, confirming that aircraft running on 20% blended fuel should have no significant reduction in performance. It was also found that for the given operating conditions there is a significant reduction in performance when 100% biofuel if used. Additionally, interesting predictions were obtained, related to NOx emissions for the blend and 100% biofuel.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1] Bilger, R.W., 2000, "Future progress in turbulent combustion and research", Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 26, pp. 367-380.
    • [2] Canakci, M., 2005, "Performance and emissions characteristics of biodiesel from soybean oil" IMechE, part D: J. Automobile Engineering, 219, pp. 915-919.
    • [3] Catalanotti, E., Hughes K.J., Pourkashanian M., UrygaBugajska, I., Williams, A., 2008, "Development of a high temperature oxidation mechanism for bio-aviation fuels". Draft version of the paper submitted to ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Boston.
    • [4] Daggett, D.L., Hendricks R.C., Walther R., Corporan E., 2007, "Alternate Fuel for use in Commercial Aircraft", The Boeing Company.
    • [5] Ebbinghaus, A., Wiesen, P., 2001, "Aircraft Fuels and their effect upon Engine emissions", Air & Space Europe, 3, pp. 24-50.
    • [6] Federal Aviation Administration, 2007, "Aviation and the environment - managing the challenge of growth".
    • [7] Heminghaus, G., Boval, T., Bosley, C., Organ, R., Lind, J., Brouette, R., Thomson, T., Lynch, J., Jones, J., 2006, "Aviation Fuels Technical Review", Chevron.
    • [8] Heyl, A., Bockhorn, H., 2001, "Flamelet modeling of NO formation in laminar and turbulent diffusion flames", Chemosphere, 42, pp. 449-462.
    • [9] Kyne, A.G., 2002, "Experimental and Theoretical Investigation of the Oxidation of Kerosene". University of Leeds PhD Thesis.
    • [10] Kyne, A.G., Porkashanian, M., Wilson, C.W., Williams, A., 2002, "Validation of a flamelet approach to modelling 3-D turbulent combustion within an airspray combustor". ASME Turbo Expo: land, sea and air.
    • [11] Leschinzer, M. A., 1990, "Modelling engineering flows with Reynolds Stress turbulence closure", Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 35, pp. 21-47.
    • [12] Maurice, L.Q., Lander, H., Edwards, T., Harrison, III W.E., 2001, "Advanced aviation fuels: a look ahead via a historical perspective", Fuel, 80, pp. 747-756.
    • [13] Miller, J.A., and Bowman, C.T., 1989, "Mechanism and Modelling of Nitrogen Chemistry in Combustion", Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 115, pp. 287-338.
    • [14] Mohibbe, A.M., Waris A., Nahar N.M., 2005, "Prospects and potential of fatty acid methyl esters of some non- traditional seed oils for use as biodiesel in India", Biomass and Bioenergy, 29, pp. 293-302.
    • [15] Patterson, P.M., Kyne, A.G., Pourkashanian, M., Williams, A. and Wilson, C.J., 2001, "Combustion of Kerosene Counter-Flow Diffusion Flames", AIAA Journal of Propulsion and Power, 17(2), pp. 453-460.
    • [16] Penner, J.E., Lister, D.H., Griggs, D.J., Dokken, D.J. and Mcfarland, M., 1999, "Summary for Policymakers: Aviation and the Global Atmosphere", A special report of IPCC Working Groups I and III: Published for the Intergovernmental Panel Climate Change.
    • [17] Peters, N., 1984, "Laminar Diffusion Flamelet Models in Non Premixed Combustion", Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 10, pp. 319.
    • [18] Riesmeier, E., Honnet, S., Peters, N., 2004, "Flamelet modelling of pollutant formation in gas turbine combustion chamber using detailed chemistry for a kerosene model fuel", Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbine and Power (ASME), 126, pp. 899-905.
    • [19] The European Commission, 2006, "Biofuels in the European Union. A vision for 2030 and beyond", Brussels.
    • [20] Tsague, L., Tsogo, J., Tatietse, T.T., 2006, "Prediction of the production of nitrogen oxide (NOx) in turbojet engines", Atmospheric Environment, 40, pp. 5727- 5733.
    • [21] Warnatz, J., Maas, U., Dibble, R.W., 2001, "Combustion. Physical and Chemical Fundamentals, Modelling and Simulation, Experiments, Pollutant Formation", Springer, Berlin.
    • [22] Dagaut, P., Gail, S., 2007, "Chemical kinetic study of the effect of a biofuel additive on Jet-A1 combustion", Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 111, 3992-4000.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article